this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2025
161 points (84.0% liked)

FediLore + Fedidrama

2476 readers
11 users here now

Rules

  1. Any drama must be posted as an observer, you cannot post drama that you are involved with.
  2. When posting screenshots of drama, you must obscure the identity of all the participants.

Chronicle the life and tale of the fediverse (+ matrix)

Largely a sublemmy about capturing drama, from fediverse spanning drama to just lemmy drama.

Includes lore like how a instance got it's name, how an instance got defederated, how an admin got doxxed, fedihistory etc

(New) This sub's intentions is to an archive/newspaper, as in preferably don't get into fights with each other or the ppl featured in the drama

Tags: fediverse news, lemmy news, lemmyverse

Partners:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://lemmy.nz/post/18610200/13255360

This user describes how most of the women-centered communities on Lemmy were shut down due to harassment of their members.

Another user adds "We need a safe space, but most of the women I know on here don’t have the time or energy to moderate it. And there’s so few of us, it feels like it’s not worth the effort anyway."

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 138 points 1 week ago (10 children)

I run a few communities that I would consider to be fairly women-oriented, or at least I would expect them to be interested. I do not expect many men to be interested, and hey that's okay. I welcome anyone who wants to, but no harm if it's not your thing.

But any post that gets made gets downvoted to hell. I routinely have to moderate and remove posts of "Why is this here" and "This is stupid" even though there are people who enjoy it, they are just swarmed by other commenters, and it's made my members less active.

It's pretty clear how people vote and act here, I'm coming up on 2 years here and it's been like how you'd expect. Downvotes don't mean "I don't think this adds to the conversation" or "This is appropriate", they mean "I personally don't like this" here, and I think that kills a lot of our smaller communities.

[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 68 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Exactly why my instance has downvotes disabled

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 49 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Apparently mods can and do ban people who just downvote everything they see, there's even been posts here about it.

Perhaps this is the solution?

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 34 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It is, I just wish it wasn't. I don't want to ban people for having negative opinions, but there are a lot of people who only downvote, and for them it's the only option. There also aren't tools to easily automate it.

[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 15 points 1 week ago

If it would really help, hit me up, I can write something to automate it.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I mean, if they only downvote, it's kind of a mercy ban. They weren't enjoying themselves anyways.

[–] lath@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes. The correct solution is to kick them out. Why are they even there if it isn't to participate? If the topic is inappropriate, make a report and let the mods handle it.

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Drag's philosophy on content policing is this:

The mods choose the rules and remove content that breaks the rules. The users downvote and argue with content that disrupts the space without breaking the rules. If actions that disrupt the space without breaking the rules create a pattern, the mods create a new rule. The users decide if they agree with the new rule. If they don't, they create a new community and the two compete.

Downvotes are absolutely essential to this ecosystem. Platforms without downvotes, like Twitter, suffer for it. The algorithm can't tell the difference between hostile engagement and positive engagement, so comments that damage the space and provoke arguments are boosted as long as they don't break the rules badly enough for the admins to get involved. Some platforms try to solve this problem by having mods and admins do three times as much work to remove all the comments that would be downvoted. This causes mod fatigue and over-moderation.

Downvotes are a disagree button BUT your disagreement is public, and if your disagreements form a pattern, the moderators should be able to action it.

What Lemmy needs is better mod tools to show analytics on downvotes (technical problem; could be solved by any determined programmer), and better action on downvotes from the admins (social problem; requires the community to dump instances that don't moderate their users)

[–] lath@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Better mod tools are a repeatedly requested feature. The question remains whether it's being ignored or it's difficult to implement and cover the entire fediverse.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] inlandempire@jlai.lu 31 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I've experienced this (though on a much smaller scale), Lemmy should have the option to disable downvotes for users not subscribed to a community, or at least not members of the instance

I would love this

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 27 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Downvotes don’t mean “I don’t think this adds to the conversation” or “This is appropriate”, they mean “I personally don’t like this” here, and I think that kills a lot of our smaller communities.

Yet another nasty redditism inherited by Lemmy... and frankly that's why I think that we should have multiple types of downvote, this way people can express their disagreement in a fast and pseudo-anonymous way without fucking everything up.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Zero22xx@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Very disappointing to find out the real reason why women-oriented communities aren't exactly thriving here. But not surprising, I guess, although I was expecting better from a platform that seems so generally left wing. Can't even expect the men here to stomp that shit out. And now I'm waiting for someone to come and respond something along the lines of "not all men" while not addressing or confronting the issue or taking any steps to push for change.

Edit: aren't admins able to see who is downvoting? So basically the admins of your instance are just sitting back and allowing certain people to ruin things for others in communities that don't concern them?

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I can, but the problem is how do you sort out genuine downvoters from as you put them, the stompers? I've been working with a few other admins to have a more automated solution. Right now I have to go into the database and do queries about once a month to find trends

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

I think I understand why one of your communities is getting downvoted, it probably attracts some dedicated megas. I'll try to go in and upvote to counter act. I'm not a fan, but I'll try to help out.

Reddit used to have a rule that you couldn't downvote more than 3 or 4 posts in any community for a certain period. They went inactive while still showing as active. I think that might have been the beginning of fuzzy votes, but turned into so much more shittyness. It still might be a good solution for here. I still think mods should also be able to tag users as default, it's really hard to remember who was hateful yesterday and troll baiting, but acting all nice today.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 47 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yup, that's a problem. Specially because, once the gender ratio gets too skewed towards one side (it is), the Petrie multiplier kicks in; then the sexism targets each woman more and more frequently.

Potential solutions that I see for the problem:

  • Perhaps creating a few instances for women? I don't mean instances to talk only about feminism, but for general stuff. With higher standards against harassment.
  • Better mod policing against harassment. Collective action, so it's easy to say and hard to do it, I know.
[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The admins could try banning sexist men, but that'll never happen

[–] ech@lemm.ee 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The admins of what? There is no singular "admins" of the Fediverse. That's kind of the whole point.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 10 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I understood "the admins" as "a meaningfully large amount of the admin teams of the Fediverse". Collective action.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 13 points 1 week ago

I think that it would be a good start. But only a start; sexism is a social problem, so even if you ban the individuals saying sexist stuff, you still see sexism elsewhere.

And even if you ban overtly sexist users, others will keep:

  • focusing on topics typically enjoyed by men, and typically disliked by women;
  • interpreting what each other says based on masculine social norms;
  • assuming that they're dealing with other men unless explicitly told otherwise;

etc.

That's still aggravating, you know? You can't pinpoint why but it still makes you feel unwelcome.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 36 points 1 week ago

I do agree that the reports and downvotes of topics geared toward women are very widespread which is exhausting, and can make it hard to talk about the things you want to. Most of the virulent, misogynistic comments get removed quickly but often the damage is already done by then. I have learned over the years on the internet that sometimes I should let womens', trans' and other races' people's spaces be their spaces, and check carefully if whatever I have to say really adds to the conversation or just minimizes/drowns out the opinions of the minority audience the community is for. So I have had the urge to participate but have backed off. I'm a bit torn because the lack of activity can also make a community feel unwelcoming, but I am concerned that even my most well-intentioned comments could have a blind spot or inherent bias that makes it also unwelcoming.

The solution I see is that a woman safe-space instance is needed, whose admins ban misogony, unhelpful comments and reports, mass downvoting etc., to the point where some might feel the actions are like PTB. Beehaw has a strict moderation stance, they even defedded from lemmy.world due to the amount of toxicity they had to deal with, but they are able to curate a more welcoming experience. We are still "early days of Reddit", it will take time and effort from users of all genders to make it a better place.

[–] koncertejo@lemmy.ml 32 points 1 week ago (10 children)

It's especially jarring coming from Mastodon, which is broadly more diverse than Lemmy. I've witnessed some really questionable comments here during the last year. I really hope something can be done to improve things. I think a feminist-specific instance might be the best option, much in the way someplace like Hexbear has managed to create a fairly strong community bloc with strong core beliefs.

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Sadly hexbear doesn't have a ton of really active comms specific to women. Though at least they're very aggressive removing misogyny across the instance. It's been categorically less stressful posting on hexbear vs the rest of lemmy simply because I'm not then checking an inbox with replies/dms calling me 'removed' or 'it' or other charming insults.

Removing downvotes makes sense too, though I also like keeping them and using them to ban people abusing it. The voter is only visible to admins though.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (4 children)

One of my first experiences on Lemmy was a bunch of mens rights activists celebrating a women's tech job fair being overrun by men.

I'm not surprised that this is a problem. Lemmy's main demographic is the tech obsessed, that's always going to be filled with misogynistic neckbeards.

[–] anindefinitearticle@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Don't say always.

It's defeatist.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 28 points 1 week ago

Not good. We need Lemmy and the fediverse represent all people as a whole if er hope to become the standard backbone of internet communication.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 27 points 1 week ago (5 children)

relevant discussions:

this issue of such a massive proportion can only be solved with intention—it’s not getting fixed by accident. recognizing the problem is the first step.

[–] anindefinitearticle@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (17 children)

I'm not quiet about being a woman, but have yet to receive dms or inappropriate responses or dismissals due to that fact (via lemmy).

EDIT: although elsewhere in this post's comment section I just received such a dismissal by someone who thought I was a man. Indeed, this is the direction in gender space along which I am used to experiencing such behavior, and it is why I have chosen to emphasize the fact that I am a female with a vagina so much in recent years: to get women to stop harassing me.

So I'll shout it out here: I'm a woman, if anyone has a problem with that or just wants to talk about it, please reach out.

I want to help solve the problem but I need to see it better first. I only ever see cherry-picked examples like you have collected here instead of seeing it in the wild. Don't get me wrong, the cherry-picked examples are bad, but I need more than a handful of outliers to really understand the problem and where it comes from before I can understand what I can do to help.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] parrhesia@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

Hard agree about it being worse then Reddit. It's gotten to the point where I don't engage as much as I want to and thinking about going back to Reddit. I'm sure there are people that would like that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Zero22xx@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Thanks for the enlightening thread. And that puts a dampener on the enthusiasm that I was feeling for this place. Not that I should be surprised or anything.

I might misunderstand how things work here but it sounds to me like if entire communities are getting bombed by downvotes, then it's the various admins across instances that are allowing this to happen. And it puts a bit of a dark cloud over this place now for me.

[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Blahaj.zone has disabled downvotes, so at least that part can't be weaponised against folk on our instance.

As for the rest of it, yeah, lemmy is better than reddit, but it did get a lot of users from reddit, so its still closer to reddit culture than I'd like. But, it's also got a lot of better aspects than reddit ever did, and hopefully that trend will continue

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

One of our admins was banning people if they saw you only downvoting. This place is so much better than reddit, that growing pains are fine with me.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] furrowsofar@beehaw.org 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Keep in mind that this is probably very instance dependend. I use Beehaw which generally does not tolerate this sort of thing and this expectation is stated very clearly. For us down voting is not even possible. We also do not federate with nodes that cause the biggest issues. So there are things that can be done but it is not perfect and has consequences.

Just mentioning.

Edit: Even with that, there has been discussion of Beehaw leaving the threadiverse due to these issues and lack of mature moderation tools. Not sure where that stands.

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Back when I used Reddit, one of my favorite subs was TrollX. If we had a sub with that spirit, it would be a good start.

Are there secret communities on Lemmy? Not that secret communities should be a default, but I was invited to a secret sub on Reddit years ago that was all women. It was a true safe space from harrassment, where we could talk about feminine things that we knew wouldn’t gain traction in main subs. I have no idea how it started, but I knew that users who were invited to join had previously been vetted by the sub’s mods - they saw that I’d made feminist posts and multiple comments about being a woman, and didn’t go around picking fights. It was like a background check.

I don’t believe there is any one solution, but starting with dedicated communities (in the spirit of TrollX), with mods that smack down misogyny and (actual) trolls, sounds like the best way to start.

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Let's get away from the "X chromosome" bit now that we're not stuck with Reddit's bad names

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (7 children)

It doesn’t need to be called the same thing.

I’m also not sure if it matters, but Troll X and Two X Chromosomes were very different subs. Troll X was more of a spin-off, and was never strictly for XX women - it was trans-inclusive by default. That’s what I’m hoping for here too.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wingsfortheirsmiles@feddit.uk 16 points 1 week ago

Is there anything others can do to help? Feddit.uk wouldn't tolerate this but I'm not sure what a regular user can do apart from look out for harassment, call it out and report promptly

[–] Wxnzxn@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It seems to be one of the problems where Lemmy feeling a bit like old Reddit is really, really bad. Remembering from back then, it took many years of concerted effort and dedicated subreddits attacking sexism (that were in turn harassed and hated on by the "mainstream" Reddit audience, like SRS for example) to slowly change the culture. And it's not like Reddit is some sort of safe haven even now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 12 points 1 week ago

You don't need to ask anyone's permission to create a Lemmy community.

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Tbf, i wouldn't recommend Lemmy to anyone i know either for more reasons including this

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›