this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2024
1040 points (97.4% liked)

You Should Know

33501 readers
5 users here now

YSK - for all the things that can make your life easier!

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with YSK.

All posts must begin with YSK. If you're a Mastodon user, then include YSK after @youshouldknow. This is a community to share tips and tricks that will help you improve your life.



Rule 2- Your post body text must include the reason "Why" YSK:

**In your post's text body, you must include the reason "Why" YSK: It’s helpful for readability, and informs readers about the importance of the content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-YSK posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-YSK posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

If you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- The majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities:

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

Credits

Our icon(masterpiece) was made by @clen15!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] yesman@lemmy.world 193 points 1 week ago (11 children)

Rent-seeking middlemen. This is the pinnacle of capitalism. Taking revenue while providing nothing is maximum efficiency. You can tell because it raises prices invisibly for everyone.

This is just a baby version of how credit card companies have placed a 1%-5% sales tax on the global economy. You might say "at least the CC companies provide a service", but that tax get's added no matter if your using a CC or not.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] derf82@lemmy.world 107 points 1 week ago (8 children)

So the TL:DW version seems to be that honey changes or adds an affiliate link to get a commission on the sale. Similar programs like Capital One Shopping probably do the same thing.

Honestly, I don’t give a shit. I hate affiliate links no matter who gets them. They are the real scam.

Sounds link the real solution is to use it to identify potential coupon codes. Then clear cookies, resign in, and enter the code yourself. But it’s not like that yields a cheaper price, so I’m not even sure I care.

[–] vodka@lemm.ee 92 points 1 week ago (3 children)

That's just one issue, there's also the fact that they partner with stores to give worse coupons than are actually available, by letting them get affiliate money when doing so. And then advertising that they ALWAYS give you the best codes, while getting paid by stores not to do so....

Theres also another video coming up with stores that have been screwed over by Honey getting hold of codes that are supposed to be hidden/limited. (though that's honestly on the store, make your limited coupons actually limited to avoid this..) But he only teased this, there might be something wkse/more.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Cataphract@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I'm torn on affiliate links. I've worked with people in sales before and it's usually scammy unless the contract is done right (flat rate commission, no bonuses for selling "certain" items). I've seen really hard working and informative workers that are actually impossible to replace because of the knowledge of products and handling the customers needs without flair or extra cost. Will inform them of cheaper methods like how easy it is to purchase and install a cable versus paying someone $100 just to plug something in and flip a switch basically.

In those instances, I think the affiliate/commission is warranted. Same with some awesome youtube channels I've ran across where they test the shit out of several products in a category (Torque Test Channel is a good one). If I need the product and I'm buying it off their recommendation I will gladly use their affiliate link if I think about it beforehand.

Now, there are some channels that I've just taken the affiliate link to be basically a form of sponsorship and promotion. Sadly a lot of construction/trade channels end up falling into this eventually. Matt Risinger is probably one of the worse ones, but even lower end guys like The Stud Pack just become a "new product showcase" channel instead of DIY or instructional videos.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 90 points 1 week ago (3 children)

You mean a free extension that claims to give me discounts seemingly out of the goodness of their hearts that also has access to every website I go to in the browser where it is installed is not exactly on the level? I'm shocked.....well...not that shocked.

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 week ago

I can't believe that something too good to be true was too good to be true!

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I tried it in a Firefox container once, while shopping for Xmas gifts. Not only did it want access to absolutely everything, none of the things I was looking to buy got any meaningful discount from it. Surely that would make one question how and why this thing is even still running, unless you don’t ask many questions.

[–] julysfire@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

People add extensions and then forget about them immediately, those are the true whales for these companies

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 81 points 1 week ago (20 children)

In the entire time I used Honey, I never once got a valid coupon code for literally anything. Pretty sure they scraped a ton of my browsing data though.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 70 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I knew Honey was sketchy, but I just assumed it made it's money from just data harvesting everything

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 64 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I see Paypal is the owner, I assume it'll be Enshittified on launch

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

Afaik honey was acquired by PayPal, they were an independent startup until then. But yeah.

[–] TheImpressiveX@lemm.ee 56 points 1 week ago

I heard about this extension years ago. I wasn't always suspicious about it, but I still never used it. I can't say I'm surprised that it turned out to be a scam.

I'd rather pay full price honestly than support stuff like this.

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 46 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (12 children)

Lmao, I never trusted a browser extension.

Like, immediately "Too Good To Be True" red flags were raised.

If I want coupon codes, I could just google "Coupon Codes for [shopping platform]"

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] notnotmike@programming.dev 41 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I'm glad this information is coming to light because I think that it should be fixed, at least as far as the affiliate link piece goes, but I find myself irritated by the sensationalism of the poster.

They're really pushing to make this seem as evil as possible, and milking it for every drop it's worth. Making this a two-part series and not exposing it immediately feels super shitty to me.

Just post the full information you have, if this is really so bad, stop trying to farm clips.

Also, not enough focus on the timeline. Honey's business model has changed dramatically since it was released long ago, and I feel like the part two video is going to complain about the original Honey business model, which was literally just a coupon code aggregator, just based on the "cliffhanger" at the end

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Sabata11792@ani.social 37 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I just assumed it was a scam the moment I saw it. Just thought it was farming data for profit out in the open because everyone else dose that. They went above and beyond and made corpo malware.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (12 children)

Why am I entirely not surprised that LMG knew what the fuck was going on, and didnt say a fuckin thing about it.

Made more public comments over legitimate criticism about his "just trust me, bro" warranty, than about honey being a out and out scam.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] aido@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (13 children)

Do people not immediately google "How does X make money" or is that just me?

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Mr_Blott@feddit.uk 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I reckon if you're stupid enough to click a thumbnail like that, you're going to get scammed at some point anyway

[–] hmonkey@lemy.lol 42 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Lol damn... yeah those thumbnails are pretty insufferable

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That thumbnail is for the video exposing honey.

[–] datavoid@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Precisely the thumbnail that would prevent you from getting scammed.

But.. ya, that is the worst possible style of thumbnail regardless.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] dan@upvote.au 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's not just Honey swapping the affiliate codes. Practically all the major coupon sites do it too. That's why they require you to click on a coupon code to reveal it. When you click, they usually reveal the coupon code in a new tab, and helpfully redirect the current tab to the store, using their affiliate link.

It's more obvious when websites do it though, since they can't auto-close the tab like Honey does. They also don't automatically pop up at checkout like Honey does.

I imagine some of the other coupon extensions do the exact same thing as Honey though.

[–] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

If you're wondering how a browser extension got so much money to pay all these YouTubers for sponsorship, well, they're not. They are literally stealing the money they paid the YouTubers right back from them by replacing their affiliate code with their own.

For people looking for replacements, Edge's integratedauto coupon code works well enough. RetailMeNot does the same job and has also been around for a long time.

[–] weeeeum@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you dont know how a business makes money, chances are its some shady stuff

Providing coupons on stuff for free, with zero ads? Thats pretty weird. Being Bought by PayPal for 4 BILLION dollars?!?!? There has to be some real sketchy shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Brian Dunning (Skeptoid podcast) went to prison for wire fraud for doing a similar stunt with EBay. Not sure what makes this any different.

[–] hakase@lemm.ee 29 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What makes it different is that it was perpetrated by Paypal, so nobody will see any consequences whatsoever.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FourThirteen@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Was it not obvious that the extension was doing that and scraping your browser data?

[–] Stitch0815@feddit.org 35 points 1 week ago

Scraping data yes Scraping affiliate links? No

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)
[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ccc is just an Amazon price tracker. IIRC their revenue is generated by clicks (the outbound hyperlinks have their Amazon affiliate identifier).

WRT to the affiliate program itself, no idea. Last I checked it still does what it says on the tin.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

They're actually providing a useful service, unlike honey just telling you that no coupons exist.

[–] TokenEffort@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Google had that one browser extension that paid $1 per device type (phone, tablet, and computer, up to $3) per week. I signed up 5 accounts and had $10 every week for Starbucks, Amazon, and a few more but I only ever used it at those places. Especially Starbucks. I loved getting a free coffee and croissant every Friday and also getting points off those 🤣

However that time is over. Do not waste your time with money-making or saving extensions.

If you want extra money use UserTesting or Brandbee. Everything else is a waste of time.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago (18 children)

I am fine with them scamming influencers. I am not fine with them being paid by websites to not give the best deals

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›