this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
182 points (96.4% liked)

politics

19104 readers
3138 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 hour ago

Phew, glad my psychiatrist prescribed me Ritalin.

[–] BenReilly97@lemmy.world 38 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

And a tax on cannabis sales would fund these farms, he proposed.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but... is he really suggesting a federal tax on a federally illegal substance?

[–] takeda@lemmy.world 18 points 2 hours ago

You hope he is just being clever and indirectly talking about legalizing cannabis, but you know that in reality he is just so incompetent that he has no idea what he is talking about.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 points 50 minutes ago (1 children)

I'm on Methalphdenadite, don't really know how to spell that...

[–] barnaclebutt@lemmy.world 1 points 29 minutes ago

A very ADHD answer. Methylphenidate. It's the generic name for Ritalin.

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 17 points 3 hours ago (2 children)
[–] DangedIfYouDid@lemmy.world 1 points 16 minutes ago

From the looks of things, 20 minutes into the future.

[–] kamiheku@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Breezy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

At 3:48 edt

[–] jerakor@startrek.website 144 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

Some sort of camp to help ADHD folks work on their concentration?

[–] distantsounds@lemmy.world 41 points 4 hours ago

Laughed too hard at this. It’s a Focus Group!!!

[–] jewbacca117@lemmy.world 33 points 4 hours ago

call it a focus village or soemthing

[–] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Technically people do owe taxes on revenue from illegal activity. You certainly could put a tax on something that's illegal, I just don't think it would bring in much revenue I'd you're still prosecuting people for that same thing you are taxing.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 1 points 53 minutes ago (1 children)

They tried that and it was previously struck down.

[–] GetOffMyLan@programming.dev 1 points 17 minutes ago

Don't you have to state how much money you made illegally on your taxes?

[–] Arbiter@lemmy.world 73 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

So his solution to ADHD is a concentration camp?

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 33 points 4 hours ago

Sure, that way they can learn to concentrate.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 26 points 4 hours ago

Nothing to see here, just politics as usual, the liberals are just trying to scare everyone. /s

[–] ambitious_bones@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

"[...]to learn to get reparented[...]"

What does that mean?

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 77 points 5 hours ago (5 children)

"I’m going to create these wellness farms where they can go to get off of illegal drugs, off of opiates, but also illegal drugs, other psychiatric drugs, if they want to, to get off of SSRIs, to get off of benzos, to get off of Adderall, and to spend time as much time as they need — three or four years if they need it — to learn to get reparented, to reconnect with communities," he said during the broadcast.

Isn’t it neat how he mixes in prescribed medical treatments? Neato.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 39 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Uh yeah, no.

I once thought it might be an idea to try and back off from 100mg sertraline to 50mg sertraline and on day two I wanted to strangle people. You can take my SSRIs from my cold dead hands.

[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 20 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, I'm on 300mg sertraline daily, and I sometimes have trouble getting my prescription filled (understandable, it's a way bigger dose than usual)

But if I'm not on it, the suicidal thoughts usually start on day 3

So if they were to take my SSRIs, I would quickly be killed by my own cold, dead hands

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 8 points 4 hours ago

I'm going to try and write on my brain to turn those thoughts entirely on the people who decided I shouldn't get my meds anymore.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, getting on and off medications is no easy task sometimes. And we already have mental health facilities you can go to for med adjustments. It's just not free.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I think you misunderstood what I was trying to say. On my current dose, I'm pretty good. Less? I very quickly go back to the state that brought me to where I needed to get on this medication. I am much better off staying on this dose until the end of my days, and frankly, so is everyone who has to interact with me.

That said, "not being free" made it so that I couldn't stay on meds when I was in my twenties. The several other obstacles I dealt with over the decades mostly had to do with insurance that I had.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

That's fair, if you need the meds, you need the meds.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 10 points 3 hours ago

Also, "get reparented" is some very sinister cult programming (ie brain washing) language..

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 25 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (3 children)

He's a big believer in the whole "keeping people on drugs isn't the fix" kind of thinking. It's short-sighted and ignorant of the fact that a lot of people on them have a net benefit to function in society.

What he is proposing is something far more stupid akin to "Well look at me. I've never needed these drugs, and I'm totally fine. WTF, people?"

If you want a country that is doing the proper work to stop jumping to long-term prescriptions as problem solvers, I'm all for that. DO NOT confuse that with these dumb shit he's suggesting though.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 3 points 1 hour ago

I agree with the principal sentiment. Except for schizophrenia and other illnesses involving acute psychosis, drugs shouldnt be the permanent solution.

But this requires access to proper psychotherapy, which needs to be part of a consistent concept of slowly reducing the drugs as the condition gets better.

Also this requires a society, where people have enough agency to remove the causes of psychological distress from their life. People getting anxieties is perfectly normal, if they are in constant fear to not be able to pay their bills. People getting depressed is perfectly normal, if they are expected to work a dead end job for the rest of their lifes, etc.

I see none of that coming from the direction of any politician.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 13 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

"Well look at me. I've never needed these drugs [He does], and I'm totally fine [He's not]. WTF, people?"

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago

Yes, but he THINKS he is.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 10 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

What he is proposing is something far more stupid akin to “Well look at me. I’ve never needed these drugs, and I’m totally fine. WTF, people?”

Except he looks like a reanimated corpse and sounds like a frog that died on a log in a bog.

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 11 points 4 hours ago

It's all the same when you believe in conspiracy theories, are not a Dr., and had a brain worm die in your head.

Also, how in the hell do we not have at least a medical degree as the very 1st requirement for a position that controls/shapes medical care for the country?!

... to spend time as much time as they need — three or four years if they need it — to learn to get reparented, to reconnect with communities ...

Is this paid time/leave? Who does he envision paying for his "wellness farms"? Or is this him envisioning everyone creating some commune farm where everyone is eating mushrooms and killing bears?

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 hours ago

does that include his new bosses?

gonna need at least four years to get them all cleaned up and 'reconnected with communities'.

and we better lock 'em all up just to make sure we don't miss a straggler or two.

[–] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 27 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

As a minority with ADHD I guess I'm fucked.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago

Summer Camp 2025 here we come! /s

[–] Hylactor@sopuli.xyz 36 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

A lot of Americans have to pass a drug test to get a new job. Perhaps RFK would like if we applied this reasoning to Trump's whole cabinet?

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 23 points 4 hours ago

They’re skipping the FBI checks. Safe to say there will be no drug tests.

[–] Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 4 hours ago

Trade offer: you take my Prozac, I go off the deep end and take some fucks with me.

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago

Wow, I'm so glad this dipshit who's never had to work a day in his life could give this paternal wisdom to the plebs who might need this medication to retain employment and not die destitute in the streets.

Who knew they just needed to be sent to a farm upstate so they could run free forever and ever?

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Zen's fascists will control you

One hundred percent natural

You will jog for the master race

And always wear the happy face

Close your eyes, can't happen here

Big bro on white horse is near

The hippies won't come back, you say

Mellow out or you will pay

Mellow out or you will pay

[–] MrGG@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 hours ago

California Über Alles!

[–] Boxscape@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 4 hours ago

Isn't this the plot of A Scanner Darkly?

[–] Today@lemmy.world 19 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

They pay your mortgage and buy your kids food while you're there?

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

"You go to a concentration camp and you go to a concentration camp! Everyone goes to a concentration camp!"

Daytime television ratings 100

[–] Draghetta@lemmy.world -3 points 2 hours ago

I wonder if commenters here went beyond the headline, or bothered to read the quote in the comments.

The actual quote is not remotely as sinister. He said that he will start these community farms (which is not a labour camp for f sake) where addicts (which is not everyone who takes meds, it’s those who do but shouldn’t, of which there are thousands) can voluntarily choose to go, which is a far cry from “I’ll shove anybody who takes antidepressants into a labour camp” as the title suggests.

There are a lot of people who take meds from dealers instead of doctors, who may have started recreationally but are now addicted to them. This is what he is lumping together with other kinds of drug addicts. It’s not even that stupid, it has been shown in studies that addiction is more effectively addressed by giving the person meaningful things to do.

Now you can have your opinion on this idea and you can be skeptical of his implementation and you really should, the guy is a nut job who shouldn’t be allowed within ten kilometres from a government office - but sending regular joes to concentration camps because they take meds is not what he said.

This title is rage bait, don’t fall for it.