this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2024
557 points (97.9% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2585 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

“He wants to be seen as having say in everything (even if he doesn’t),” one person in Trump’s orbit said.

Elon Musk’s growing influence in Donald Trump’s orbit is reportedly irritating members of the former president’s inner circle.

Since his efforts helped secure Trump’s reelection, Musk has been highly visible at Mar-a-Lago, taking credit for Trump’s victory and acting as if he’s a “co-president.”

Musk has joined key diplomatic calls and even attempted to broker peace with Iran.

Despite his appointment to lead the Department of Government Efficiency, some close to Trump feel Musk’s overreach and need for attention may jeopardize his position, as Trump dislikes sharing the spotlight.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LavenderDay3544@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

Good let them eat each other.

[–] MaxPow3r11@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

Elon Musk Is Pissing Off Everyone

ftfy

[–] Kite@sh.itjust.works 5 points 7 hours ago

Even ignoring the fact that he's a billionaire and that's what got him where he is, Musk's personality seems to be such that he is innately annoying as fuck. He'll always have yes-men around him because of his money, but I do wonder just how long everyone else in his current political circle are going to tolerate him. I'm hoping he'll be his own annoying downfall.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

Let them beat each other to pulp even before January, and it won't be a loss.

[–] EnderMB@lemmy.world 15 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

I had predicted this a while back, in that enabling Trump meant victory for the GOP, but the total erosion of Conservative values. This is clear in that any career politician will likely cede power to a bunch of nutjobs or meme lords with money.

They can either shut up and let Trump do his thing (lol), or they can dig their heels in and fight his decisions from within, grinding government to a halt (also lol). Either way, it's a win for most, because in the long term the right will bail after Trump and leave a party so weak that it probably won't be able to fight off the memory of Trump. He'll never endorse a candidate that's not himself, especially if the GOP blocks him. His rabid fan base will either die out, or go third-party because the GOP is "too woke" or something.

[–] a9cx34udP4ZZ0@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago

because in the long term the right will bail after Trump and leave a party so weak that it probably won’t be able to fight off the memory of Trump

Look at this optimist still assuming there's going to be another election and that a republican party actually matters. The supreme court has already ruled he can't be held liable for anything he does while president if it's an "official act" - if you think he won't try "officially" ending the public choosing the next president, you might be in for a rude awakening.

[–] UpperBroccoli@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Conservative values

I don't think the dollar values in their accounts have eroded. Or where you meaning something else?

[–] EnderMB@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

A lot of people favour less government intervention, fiscal responsibility, stronger laws, and strength in the free market. IMO at a base level this isn't an inherently evil thing to believe/want.

Obviously, most politicians don't represent this, but for those that do they find the current party doesn't represent them. Eight years of Trump is probably enough to destroy many careers.

[–] Don_alForno@feddit.org 1 points 6 hours ago

IMO at a base level this isn't an inherently evil thing to believe/want.

Not evil, but misguided. All of these things are euphemisms for destroying (or not having in the first place) social safety nets, letting deregulated corporations run amok and replacing the rule of law with the rule of the richest. And most people who say they want these euphemisms don't understand that, otherwise they wouldn't want them. Because the consequences are objectively bad for at least 90% of people in any given country.

Btw, none of these things you mention are "conservative values".

[–] cmhe@lemmy.world 18 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Trumps administration will likely start out with a lot of power hungry egomaniac freaks, and then with its very high turnover, trump loyalists will be filtered through, like they did in their first term.

Competence doesn't really matter.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 11 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I really hope they throw him under the bus, and then later they can fire him and blame him for anything that goes wrong.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I hope he causes havoc until that instant.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 3 points 14 hours ago

If he runs the US Government anything like he runs Tesla and Twitter, yeah that's on brand.

[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 28 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Trump has promised a cabinet position to every insufferable asshole in the country who insists that everyone accept their own fringe views and talks over anyone who disagrees, while also knowing nothing about what they're talking about. This is gonna be funny to watch, but painful to experience.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 9 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Hoping this results in real negative consequences for once in musk's life.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 hours ago

I hope he pisses them off so much Trump strips him of his wealth... then maybe other rich people would see why this future is going to suck.

[–] WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago

Chance of him learning for said negative experience: 0%

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago

Hey, yeah. Trump is a vindictive shit against people he perceives as disloyal. Watch what happens to Mike Pence after the inauguration to see a preview of how badly Republicans are going to eat their own. Hopefully very badly.

[–] bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 12 hours ago

Something, something, night of the long knives

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 26 points 23 hours ago

The only good part of the Trump regime will be watching them infight as we all go up in flames.

[–] 5in1k@lemm.ee 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

A less endearing Dwight Schrute

[–] Chekhovs_Gun@lemmy.world 11 points 21 hours ago

Assistant to the regional dictator

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 3 points 16 hours ago

For a second I thought you meant Dwight from DBD and I just imagined Elon Musk getting chased around The Fog by Ghosface and Dracula.

[–] bender223@lemmy.today 10 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

He's a genius billionaire, so we should always listen to what he says, no matter how stupid it is.

/s

[–] auzy@lemmy.world 10 points 16 hours ago

Yeah. Like that shitty sub he built

At least unlike the cave divers, when he calls people in Trump's team a pedo this time when they ignore him, he might actually be right

[–] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Wouldn't it be awesome if they had a big punch-up?

[–] sheogorath@lemmy.world 10 points 23 hours ago

It would be nice if their future punchups doesn't include us as potential collateral :')

[–] mynameisigglepiggle@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It would be like some old celebrity and someone heavily involved in social media going at it

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 90 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

Musk has joined key diplomatic calls and even attempted to broker peace with Iran.

That's a pretty clear violation of the Logan Act. Gettin' blue from holding my breath over here.

[–] mwguy@infosec.pub 7 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Historically the Logan act has been interpreted to not include the Presiden-Elect and their incoming administration.

If the things mentioned this is the most "normal".

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 8 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Is it possible to be part of an administration if you've only been named as part of a department that doesn't exist?

[–] mwguy@infosec.pub 3 points 13 hours ago

That specific precedent likely doesn't exist as most new cabinet level positions aren't created by President Elects.

[–] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm sure Gutless Garland will get right on it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] demizerone@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Trump should just shit his pants every time Elon shows up.

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

What makes you think he doesn't?

[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago

I'm looking forward to 4 years of great and annoying articles like this

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 13 points 1 day ago

Sucks to be them.

[–] enbyecho@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago

Didn't see this coming from about 136 miles away. Oh no...

load more comments
view more: next ›