this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
193 points (97.1% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3885 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Grogon@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (9 children)

I have one question about the abortion topic.

Why is it such a HUGE topic for republicans? Why not let the individual human choose if he/she wants an abortion?

This is so confusing for me I don't understand why it is even a topic, like... it's not my body and just let people do what they want to.

They should talk about how to have safer sex and pills in earlier grades and just keep the option open.

It's not only that... what if you get raped and just want an abortion? Is that also included?

I am not american, maybe someone can tell me if rape is not included and if you are raped you can still abort though? This whole topic seems off for 2024, this sounds like a 1800s topic.

Sometimes I think america is so advanced and then I read the news and it's always about pro guns and banning abortions...

[–] zqwzzle@lemmy.ca 23 points 2 days ago

Pastor Dave Barnhart

“The unborn” are a convenient group of people to advocate for. They never make demands of you; they are morally uncomplicated, unlike the incarcerated, addicted, or the chronically poor; they don’t resent your condescension or complain that you are not politically correct; unlike widows, they don’t ask you to question patriarchy; unlike orphans, they don’t need money, education, or childcare; unlike aliens, they don’t bring all that racial, cultural, and religious baggage that you dislike; they allow you to feel good about yourself without any work at creating or maintaining relationships; and when they are born, you can forget about them, because they cease to be unborn. It’s almost as if, by being born, they have died to you. You can love the unborn and advocate for them without substantially challenging your own wealth, power, or privilege, without re-imagining social structures, apologizing, or making reparations to anyone. They are, in short, the perfect people to love if you want to claim you love Jesus but actually dislike people who breathe.

Prisoners? Immigrants? The sick? The poor? Widows? Orphans? All the groups that are specifically mentioned in the Bible? They all get thrown under the bus for the unborn.

[–] qantravon@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The American version of Christianity has decided that a fetus is a person, and as such that an abortion is murder. They make it this emotional issue so that people don't think too hard about it and just reflexively think "I can't support murder!"

This is despite the Bible pretty explicitly defining life as beginning at the first breath, and treating causing a miscarriage as property damage.

It's part and parcel of the Republican party essentially taking over the church and getting people to equate "Republican" with "Christian".

[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Abortion used to just be a Catholic thing, but after the Civil Rights Act was passed political opportunists sought a new issue to drive southern evangelicals and abortion was it (and later gay people, but abortion was first).

Now however, the con has been bought by those in power and joined with the more toxic forms of longtermism which posits that humans must reproduce at all costs. And here we are today.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 6 points 2 days ago

You forgot racism, a quiet cornerstone of the Southern Strategy. Not as quiet now, since it worked so well in growing a solid voter base who is now more encouraged when those parts are shouted loudly. Could be why Roe v. Wade was allowed to disappear, didn't need that windmill to charge at anymore.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Republicans all care about life and babies until it comes time to give time off to raise the kids, provide welfare programs for poor families, provide schools with lunches. Can't kill a fetus in the womb but they dont give a fuck if the child starves at 5.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

They really just want more poverty-stricken and uneducated voters. That's their core demographic: people easy to manipulate into believing they will fix all the issues created by their past policies.

[–] stoned_ape@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

If you're pre-born, you're fine. If you're pre-school, you're fucked

-Carlin

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago

They would have no issue with the murder of a black or Hispanic person though.. especially at their own hands or by 'law enforcement'.

It's sad all around.

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Because it ultimately makes poor people even poorer. It helps to shackle people to the slave life. It also helps feed the army with poor desperate people so they can keep fighting their wars.

[–] Oyml77@lemmy.today 16 points 2 days ago

Republicans are all about controlling what other people can and cannot do. Throw some evangelical "morality" on top of that and now a fetus is sacred and sex is sinful.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

Here's the issue: they say things like it's returning the right to the state, which is a lie but it sounds correct. That right never belonged to any state. It was a right held by the people, then states tried to remove it so the Supreme Court gave it (very limited) protections from encroachment.

It's always been a right that belonged to the people and any other rhetoric is trying to mislead. I've never heard a Democrat make this argument though, so they lost the election. They allowed Republicans to control the narrative while they squabled about how they want limits on abortion actually.

It's the same argument as slavery. The federal government needs to protect the rights of people because states are trying to restrict them, and it is not their right to do so.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It's a wedge issue. Its purpose is to align groups with the Republican party that might have otherwise chosen to support the only other viable party, the Democrats. The thinking goes like this:

Well, I can't support murder, so I have to vote for Republicans no matter what and ignore all other issues. What could be more important? I feel good closing my eyes now to feeding the poor, healing the sick, etc!

[–] GrymEdm@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Christianity mate. I was raised evangelical, and it's insane. People "speak in tongues" believing that the Holy Ghost is summoning unknown words of power through them. When someone was outed as a homosexual in a church I was raised in, every adult would take turns placing their hands on either side of their head and casting out the demon of homosexuality. The Flood covered the whole Earth, God designed each animal as they are, etc.

The abortion/reproductive rights topic is religion made political.

Logic, facts and compassion are very secondary and ignored completely if there's a conflict with belief. The folks I grew up with would wholeheartedly say that behavior you and I would consider hateful was done out of love. When I left the church I discovered sayings like, "There's no hate like Christian love". That being said, there are good people and more people in each generation deprogram themselves and realize they'd rather be sane than saved (in the sense of evangelical salvation).

[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Trump has said he'd veto a national abortion ban, for whatever that's worth. And to answer your question, to most peo-life activists, abortion is murder. It's black and white to them.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Trump has said.... for whatever that's worth.

His words are worth their weight in gold!

[–] PenguinMage@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Never failed to do anything he promised his first term! I mean he completely did... tax breaks for the rich... yep this dog got put down.

[–] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I think is a little bit more than a threat to rights. As I'm looking at it right now, driving through the suburbs and all the Trump fanatics, the US could deteriorate into civil war with 100,000s dead. Trump economy will fail and he'll refuse to give up power by rsorting to violence and his followers will be happy to oblige him. They have lost all reason.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Even if all the Democrats quietly left the country, MAGA policies could lead to civil war.

[–] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

They are dead set on it, whether Trump had won or not.

[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

Hey now, that's 100,000's less people producing carbon emissions...yay?

[–] Blackout@fedia.io 2 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Instead of focusing on the bad, let's focus on the good things a 2nd term will bring. Anybody got anything?

[–] neanderthal@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

The tariffs will tank consumption and possibly reduce greenhouse gas emissions?

Blue states can raise taxes since the fed government will lower taxes and provide a kickass quality of life without funding the red states.

Since they love the 10th amendment, blue states can go hog wild with running things in a sane manner.

Hell, maybe the US will split into 3: Pacifica on the West Coast, magastan, and Atlantica (East Coast)

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He won't be able to run again

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

That’s a tradition, not a law.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

no, that's the 22nd amendment.

of course with this scotus the constitution doesn't mean anything now.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

It's a tradition turned law. Neither mean he can't though. He just legally can't (right now).

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 days ago

It literally the fire under my seat to get my documentation in order and learn about Canada's fast pass immigration system

[–] blackbelt352@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Nope. I got nothing.

[–] ShadowRam@fedia.io 7 points 2 days ago

4 years of quality Leopards ate my face content..

[–] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Hardcore, ska, punk and every anti-whatever music genre are going to be lit as shit over the next ten years.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If the Constitution and related things persist, it will be the last Trump term. And maybe some lessons learned on the way on why the GOP in control is a bad thing.

[–] LuxSpark@lemmy.cafe 4 points 2 days ago

I keep thinking we will learn that lesson but we never do.