this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2024
637 points (98.5% liked)

Programmer Humor

32483 readers
384 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 114 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Pretty sure the user experience folk are screaming for a path to be built there but are getting ignored.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 38 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They aren't being ignored. The corner needs to be a right angle for compliance reasons.

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But the actual corner isn't even a right angled corner.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They were forced to cut corners in implementation.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Everyone says, they are not bringing their best angles. Triangles. Quadrangles. And some I assume are acute angles.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

What we should do is put chainlink fence around the corner, but make the part that the users loved the most accessible with a monthly pass that they can only walk on with shoes purchased at the university store.

- spez

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

You mod 16 subs, what do you get?

Another day blocking API requests.

Saint Peter don’t DM me cuz I can’t go.

I owe my soul to Spez’s asshole.

[–] savvywolf@pawb.social 22 points 1 week ago

It's important we do it that way for our 🌟brand identity🌟.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

How about a pond?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 80 points 1 week ago (19 children)

A lot of universities with large campus grounds take the approach of observing the natural foot traffic wear patterns on grassy areas, and then build walkways where the most worn down parts are.

Its... pretty obvious.

If everyone is taking an alternate, non designed path... your design sucks, modify it to facilitate what people find more effective.

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] pageflight@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (6 children)

And there's a whole community for them! Not sure how to link to it though.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 1 week ago

iirc it's what they did in central park. Don't create paths and later pave the desire paths that show up

[–] zante@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 week ago

Don’t underestimate youthful rebellion!

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] mypasswordis1234@lemmy.world 68 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] menemen@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Should include a concept to reduce impervious surfaces in modern times. User experience is not the only variable.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 68 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Whenever that happens, the design is wrong.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 41 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Fixed. Added a wall with razor wire on top to prevent this.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] superkret@feddit.org 17 points 1 week ago

In IT, sometimes there's security reasons for the designed detour.
But then good design would completely obstruct the shortcut from the user's view.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

change log: We've adjusted the 20 year old UI to better reflect modern aesthetic trends that our new hires learned in school.

[–] lnxtx@feddit.nl 5 points 1 week ago

Works as intended. kthxbye

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 57 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Designers need to wake up and realize their job is to understand what the user wants not what they saw in a wet dream.

Not a universal rule, however. Theres the whole concept of "optimizing yourself out of the fun" and what not in video games. Or the hardships being part of what makes a game fulfilling. It depends on what your goal is

[–] pfm@scribe.disroot.org 2 points 6 days ago

Wake up Nee-Oh!

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 39 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I, unfortunately, have to use GitHub at $DAYJOB and this is me. I navigate most of the webpage via the URL bar now.

Basically, let's say I'm working on a repo github.com/tomato/sauce/ and want to navigate to the Releases page.

Via the webpage:

  1. Type github.com into the URL bar.
  2. Don't find tomato/sauce/ in the list of recent repos, even though it's the only repo I work on.
  3. Click on some other repo that's at least in the tomato/ org.
  4. Navigate up to the tomato/ org.
  5. Find the sauce/ repo in the list.
  6. Traverse half the fucking screen to hit the "Releases" heading in the middle of the About-section.

Via the Firefox URL bar:

  1. Type gi→t→s→r→.
  2. Hit Enter.

I admit, it's hard to compete with the latter, but I wouldn't know how to navigate that way, if the former wasn't so terrible.

[–] NorthWestWind@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

What kind of sicko try to find their repos from the recent list on the main page??

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 week ago

Hopefully somebody else $DAYJOBs at GitHub and will see this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sylveon@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 1 week ago
[–] fubo@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago

"What the user needed" / "What management demanded"

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 23 points 1 week ago
[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 week ago (7 children)

What the shit happened to that tree's shadow?

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 week ago

Probably the tree is shadowing the same area that a window in or near the building the picture is being taken from is illuminating.

[–] NaturalViber@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Also, why is this shadow off from the others

[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

that's just perspective, they're only parallel when looking for a perfectly top-down angle

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] whithom@discuss.online 7 points 1 week ago

That’s right, it goes in the square hole.

load more comments
view more: next ›