this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
39 points (97.6% liked)

Europe

1459 readers
604 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So, company expected employees to WFH during pandemic to keep the company running and they complied. Company saw all that empty real estate and cut costs, company then demands office time, and finds out they do not have enough office space anymore.. and this is now the employees problem.

~~It's time that 50pct WFH is government mandated to cut down on unnessecary travel and pollution.~~ Travel time should just be considered work time by the government, watch the WFH return immediately and office time flex around rush hours all of a sudden.

[–] Katzastrophe@feddit.org 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Eh, that might cause location based discrimination. Maybe make it so that companies have to pay for gas or public transport of their employees instead

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Maybe a little. But they need employees.

Make them pay the time the commute takes you as if it was working time. You're only commuting to work for them after all. That will sort the issue once and for all.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago

Given that rents are higher near population centers, i think "the market" would solve it.

[–] CAVOK@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago
[–] dandi8@fedia.io 7 points 1 week ago

The most shameful part is that the union unequivocally supports RTO, they just want it to be done a bit more slowly.

Fuck neurodivergent people, and people who took the job from another city, like those in rhe article who need to commute 6 hours a day, right?

[–] trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

forcing some staff to take meetings in the toilets.

Unless a meeting was about that particular toilet and required being held there in order to see an issue to be discussed first hand, I'd absolutely refuse to attend. Are those people out of their mind?

[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Maybe it's a pretty and elaborate toilet room with comfy chairs and desks? Glass windows and a view of nature or the city?

[–] CaptObvious 5 points 1 week ago

RTO is causing trouble everywhere. Good

[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago

They increased the target from only 50 to 60 percent in-office. And don't even have space for their people, lol.

We’re supposed to be inside 60 percent of the time, but there are only seats for 50 percent of the staff, so you have to puzzle. In some places there is a lot of space left, in others not. Yesterday, for example, two of my colleagues sat in the toilet and took meetings because there was no room. Others go out and get in the car,” she says.

What does "space for 50 percent of the staff" even mean? With the 60 % target being over the year, you'll still have phases and instances where a lot more than 50 % of people come into the office. Maybe not 90 %, but I would expect at least space for 70-80 %.