this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
86 points (92.2% liked)

Asklemmy

43626 readers
1156 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RadDevon@lemmy.zip 15 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

My brother used to work for an SEO company. They charged clients to have their web sites on directories which would improve their Google pagerank… until Google updated the algorithm to penalize sites listed in these directories. The company quickly pivoted to charging the same clients to have them removed from the directories they had just charged them to be listed in.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago

As much as I hate SEO companies, people who hire them are even worse, so I can only approve of this.

[–] Meron35@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

Hong Kong's subway system offers fare discounts if you use the entrances/exits that require you to walk through a mall, as part of their monetisation of spaces required to access public services

[–] xnx@slrpnk.net 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] Brahvim@lemmy.kde.social 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] xnx@slrpnk.net 2 points 20 hours ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kwakigra@beehaw.org 27 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Capitalists will say that it's fine for an economy to have a few capitalists own all capital and all physical and intellectual property while common people are only allowed to rent it from the capitalists at whatever rate the capitalist pleases. However, capitalists will also say that the evil of socialism is that you won't be allowed to own property. That's the most capitalist thing I'm aware of.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago

Yep, that's why Marx is correct. Capitalism consolidates itself into large monopolist syndicates, removing the usefulness of Capitalists and eliminating competition, whereby Central Planning of public property becomes greatly more efficient.

The essential conditions for the existence and for the sway of the bourgeois class is the formation and augmentation of capital; the condition for capital is wage-labour. Wage-labour rests exclusively on competition between the labourers. The advance of industry, whose involuntary promoter is the bourgeoisie, replaces the isolation of the labourers, due to competition, by the revolutionary combination, due to association. The development of Modern Industry, therefore, cuts from under its feet the very foundation on which the bourgeoisie produces and appropriates products. What the bourgeoisie therefore produces, above all, are its own grave-diggers. Its fall and the victory of the proletariat are equally inevitable.

-Karl Marx, Manifesto of the Communist Party

For more reading, Why Public Property? is a good article elaborating in modern lingo.

Capitalists also say "You'll own nothing and be happy", the part they leave out is that it's because you will rent every from them. In filthy socialism, the state holds everything in trust for the people and nobody makes any profits from ownership (the true power of capital).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

That you can lease prison labor.

[–] hyacin@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A peanut with a top hat and a monocle selling you other peanuts, to eat.

[–] thevoidzero@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Considering humans did sell humans.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

If you can deny the sentience and right to exist without being property of cows, pigs, and chickens, its a very small step to humans.

[–] emerald@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I see a private ambulance service driving around my town occasionally and it always makes my skin crawl

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Anytime I'm in Texas I get the same feeling.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

all the mercenary healthcare strikes me as creepy capitalism.

[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Motorcycle airbag vests that will not work if you aren't up-to-date on the subscription payments when you have a crash...

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, it kind of makes some sense. Part of what they're doing is checking your location, speed, bearing, etc., and--IIRC--using cell signals for some of that. That's bandwidth, and someone has to pay for it, even if it's not very much. OTOH, Helite makes a vest that uses a tether, and that's going to work well enough in most cases.

I think that there might be some that have options to pay for it all up-front instead of having a subscription, but I'm not positive; I just rely on leather and Knox inserts.

[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't have any direct info on how it works, but I would have assumed it could be done completely offline with some sort of accelerometers. But I am a Lay Person so... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 1 points 5 hours ago

Accelerometers don't work that great with motorcycles; when you go into a hard turn, the accelerometer still thinks that you're straight up, due to centripedal force. You'd actually need gyroscopes. (...Which is why adaptive headlights for motorcycles end up being so expensive, and why only BMW specs them, and only on one or two touring models.)

[–] Achyu@lemmy.sdf.org 78 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Recently?

How a lawyer in America got jailed for legally fighting against(and defeating) an American multi-national oil company that polluted the Amazon and more importantly harmed the lives and health of the locals with the pollution.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9OtIAZMqrZE
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_Donziger

[–] BertramDitore@lemm.ee 27 points 2 days ago

Donziger’s story is heartbreaking and infuriating, and I’m continually disappointed that so few people are familiar with his story and what the courts did to him. It’s one of the clearest examples of judicial corruption and the power and benefits that are afforded to corporations and almost never extended to the people fighting for what’s right and just.

[–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 day ago

In June 2022, a federal appeals court affirmed Donziger's criminal contempt conviction. In March 2023, the Supreme Court declined to hear further appeals.

I'm shocked.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] superkret@feddit.org 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Today I heard Meta has laid off workers because they brought their own food for lunch instead of buying it from the company cafeteria.

[–] beliquititious@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well yes, but also no. Meta fired those folks because they were using their lunch stipend provided by meta for things other than lunch. Petty, given how much they were paying the employees, but almost certainly a breach of contract on the employee's part.

Meta is probably trying to do layoffs without paying layoff costs or taking the stock hit layoffs can cause. Which is still capitalist AF by any measure, lol. For fans of watching what kind of shit the oligarchy is trying now, Meta is definitely one to keep an eye on. Mark Zuckerberg has been moving very conservative very quickly lately.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 66 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Here in Sweden we currently have the problem that hospitals are understaffed and keeping wages of nurses so low that a lot of nurses quit and leave the others with an even crazier workload so the hospitals buy nurses semi permanently from temp agencies that cost multiple times more and the rental nurses have better pay and agreements of overtime and such. We had a well functioning health care but then the privatisation of everything and selling out communally owned services to private profit making schemes since the 90s. Because our government has been dominated by right wing market liberals and "sossehöger" - social democrats that jump on right wing populism to stay in power when they can rather than being consistent in left wing ideals.

Fucking end the market liberal experiment already. "The market solves all problems" - yeah, of it's own interest which is how to squeeze out more profits regardless the how and how low it stoops.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

EVERY instance of 'public-private' healthcare goes that route, touted as the wave of the future and a seamless melding of public interest and delicious capitalist pork, and then every single one of them gets drunk on the cash and goes toxic like this.

It's happening to Canada too. And France. And London.

[–] uninvitedguest@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago

Seeing it happen in real time in Ontario is soul crushing.

[–] Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Damn, I didn't know America was contagious...

[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

It's been the strategy of the right wing here since forever - get in power sell out as much they can (and for some unfathomable reason for discount prices), fuck things up in general, leave it to a left wing government to salvage what can be saved while blaming them for public service being garbage so they can motivate selling out more when they have power again. It's a mix of blind idealists and profiteering scum that are in liaison with the right wing nationalist party with former nazi connections and obviously the Christian democrat leader that models the party according to the republicans is the most buddy-buddy with the fringe right.

And the populist right wing of course romanticises about the good days when everyone had housing and was safe and provided and so on - that was built solely by the left and the right wing fought them every step of the way and that they have since then torn down. Blatant lies and disinformation all the way.

But it is what people vote for. We get the societal break down we deserve.

[–] nitefox@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 hours ago

Same happens in Italy. It’s probable the govt will collapse before 2027 and they won’t campaign as much for the new elections, so the new govt will be blamed for all the problems these fuckers caused

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] POTOOOOOOOO@reddthat.com 83 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Health Insurance that covers next to nothing but costs a fortune anyway.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

I'm in the middle of trying to get a fairly expensive surgery.

If I had insurance, I would need to pay about $15,000 (between premiums, copays, annual deductible, coinsurance, and out of pocket maximums) with the only insurance available to me through my workplace before anything would be covered. So it's not really worthwhile, right? Well, the surgery I need--around here--gets quotes of as much as $89,000. The most recent quote that I have is around $18,000. Keep in mind that the surgery takes about an hour, is a surgeon, one OR nurse assisting, and an anesthesiologist. The fee for the surgeon and nurse is about $5000, and the facility takes about $10,000. In the case of surgery in a hospital--rather than an ambulatory surgical center (ACS0---it's even worse. With the same surgeon and OR nurse at an ACS, I had a quote of $16,300; at a hospital the quote was $49,000. The surgeon and nurse get the same fee regardless, which means that the hospital charged >$30,000.

...And good fucking luck getting a lot of places to give you prices at all, even though DHHS has mandated pricing transparency. Even if you know exactly what CPT billing codes are going to be used, it can be days of back and forth before you can get a price. If you need shit fixed NOW, you're just going to be stuck with whatever they charge.

[–] Vanth@reddthat.com 40 points 2 days ago (8 children)

☝️ recently got a covid test that based on all my research beforehand, it should have been covered except for $10 I would pay.

Jokes on me, it actually cost me $200 they charged to my credit card two weeks later. I didn't even get to know the price at the time I needed medical care.

Sometimes other countries make fun of America for things they don't understand. Not on this one, America deserves every bit of mocking it gets for it's medical coverage atrocity.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A more recent example comes from the med-tech giant Abbott Labs, which used DMCA 1201 to suppress a tool that allowed people with diabetes to link their glucose monitors to their insulin pumps, in order to automatically calculate and administer doses of insulin in an "artificial pancreas." -eff.org

We joke about someday having to jailbreak our own organs, but we're basically already there.

An exoskeleton let a paralyzed man walk. Then its maker refused repairs.

Doctors Remove Woman’s Brain Implant Against Her Will

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 1 points 14 hours ago

these are straight out of Repo, the Genetic Opera

[–] mitrosus@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 day ago
[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago

suppressing wages and social housing so that starvation and homelessness make labour cheaper

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Is the answer not chattel slavery?

[–] velox_vulnus@lemmy.ml 42 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

Microloans, also called microfinances. Very popular in developing countries in South Asia, and also the same thing that is responsible for the suicide epidemic of farmers in India. With high interest rates and fixed time-period constraints, they're the most cruel and fucked up things to ever exist, they're worse than indentured serfdom.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 39 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Sounds like 'pay day loans' in the US.

Back in the day, a loan shark was a criminal who charged an outrageous 20% interest for money. Working class folks were at the mercy of these "six-for-fivers."

Ronald Reagan became President and now established banks could charge 35% or more.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] fart_pickle@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I cannot find the exact quote but it was something like "If you don't grow, you're dying". This is the source of all enshittification. Companies are being forced by VCs to increase revenue every year to meet unreasonable revenue goals just to satisfy a handful of investors.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] weeeeum@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

"In the interest of user safety and security..."

Always before some dumb new draconian shit

[–] piyuv@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago (11 children)

“Vote with your wallet” means more money gets you more votes.

Some users leaving Reddit/instagram/twitter is not a problem, especially considering network effects, but some advertisers leaving is a crisis.

[–] nitefox@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago

The users down here trying to teach you what it means while you know it better than them lmao.

“Vote with your wallet” doesn’t mean “if you don’t like it don’t buy it” but if that you don’t like the new iteration of the product reason you shouldn’t buy it, thus letting the company know it wasn’t good enough and they should do better. This premise is flawed because it sounds like some democratic shit, but the only ones who can vote with their wallet are the whales that actually have % on that sweet company revenue: for the average user there is no vote because to matter it would have to scale with other consumers. Something so far unachievable because for a tiny, “loud” minority there is the clueless majority.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›