this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
88 points (92.3% liked)

Asklemmy

43626 readers
1173 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DampSquid@feddit.uk 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] nitefox@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Actually owning two or three homes is okay-ish. The problem is when you own tens and rent them all

[–] DampSquid@feddit.uk 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Two or three makes you a slumlord

[–] nitefox@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago

You can own “beach” and mountain houses for vacation, it doesn’t necessarily mean you are disgustingly rich. The problem with people owning multiple houses is that they reduce the possibility for other people to buy or own a house, and most of the time they are rented and the landlords don’t have a few houses to rent but tens

[–] mke_geek@lemm.ee -4 points 2 days ago

There's nothing wrong with that.