this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
514 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

59588 readers
3097 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 116 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Scary to think that the answer will be no.

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 49 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Depends on the manufacturer. A lot of American and European “smart” cars work fine without an internet connection. You need to use a key fob, and apps cloud maps or streaming apps obviously won’t work, but the basic driving, climate, and media stuff should work.

A lot of American and European cars actually kill your cloud service access if you don’t keep paying a subscription fee.

[–] Gork@lemm.ee 62 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I have zero use for a cloud connected car lol.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Cloud connected cars are essentially what happens when companies refuse to admit smart phones are superior for 99% of the stuff they want their car to do, and the other 1% is subscription bullshit.

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 43 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Nah they're using that cloud connection to spy on you and make money on the backend by selling your data.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (10 children)

Makes you wonder about ice cars too.

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 18 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Absolutely, in that the more software in a vehicle, the more likely it is to brick once a company folds. ICE cars are less likely since they don't have most of the software, but there are some that are computers on wheels still (and I'm sure the amount will continue to increase).

[–] UsernameHere@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (6 children)

ICE vehicles have more software because they have more components. They have a transmission control module and an engine control module both of which have a lot of sensors to read and outputs to control. Much more than a simple EV would have.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] tal@lemmy.today 101 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (10 children)

I think that that can be generalized to:

"When shuts down, will their still work?"

Cars are a particularly problematic example, because they have a long life and are expensive, but generally-speaking, I think that when someone buys a cloud-connected device, it's a good idea to think "what exactly is going to happen if this company goes under and stops providing online services, or just discontinues service at some point" at the outset.

Might be cars or smartwatches or live service video games. They all run into similar issues.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 months ago (9 children)

Yup, that's why I don't buy that crap. I would love an EV, but they all seem to spy on their drivers and I'm concerned that all that spyware isn't properly protected anyway.

An EV really shouldn't be all that complicated, and there's zero reason for it to connect to the outside world. All it needs to do is:

  • charge the battery
  • regulate the battery's temperature
  • discharge the battery to make it go

None of that requires power, and that whole process is much simpler than my ICE car, which doesn't have any external communication either. Give me an EV without all the smart crap and I'll probably buy it.

[–] perviouslyiner@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (17 children)

That's not an EV issue that's a modern car issue.

One of the worst privacy risks was Buick who didn't even make EVs.

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] viking@infosec.pub 13 points 2 months ago

Yep, and precisely why I refuse to buy anything that requires an internet connection to work. I'm even wary of services that lock me in for longer than maybe 6 months. The only annual subscription I have is for my VPN.

An actual device/machine that I plan to use for years? Hell no. Offline only is a must have.

[–] T156@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

A car is also difficult to ignore, compared to something smaller.

A small expensive device that stopped working because the company shut it down is annoying, but you can at least put it to the side and ignore it.

You can't really do that to a car that has functionally become a paperweight because the parent company has gone under.

[–] DJDarren@thelemmy.club 11 points 2 months ago (3 children)

This was really thrown into sharp focus for me a couple of years back, when I read an article about how people with ocular implants are being left to go blind again because the company who made their implant has been bought by another company who doesn't want to continue support.

I just can't think about how callous that is, and if a company doesn't give a shit about that, why would they give a shit about a car?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 72 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Ever drive in a car with a big screen from like 10+ years ago that has the most outdated, useless UI?

Now imagine that's your whole car.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 39 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I miss the days when the radio was its own separate thing in a car. Hate the outdated UI? Just replace the radio head unit with a modern one.

Nowadays it's a lot more difficult. There is a module called iDatalink Maestro that allows you to still maintain most factory features after replacing your head unit, but a lot of cars tend to be incompatible—especially EVs—as more and more features become integrated into the stereo. The days of modular components in cars is nearing an end.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You can get that experience with new cars too. Especially anything made by BMW who presumably don't extend their craftsmanship ideals to their software.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bizarroland@fedia.io 72 points 2 months ago (9 children)

I'm looking forward to the "how to hack your Tesla to 100% operational functionality using a raspberry pi 9 and this dongle, run your car with your phone!" youtube videos (or whatever streaming service steps over its flaming corpse to replace) it in the next few decades

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 30 points 2 months ago (23 children)

People have already been jailbreaking Teslas to unlock full self-driving, which is a $10k software patch.

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And somehow the RPi9 will still need some $90 5V20A USB power supply

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 68 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Will a new anything work if the manufacturer kills off the entirely unnecessarily forced network features?

This is not an EV problem, this is an MBA grifting problem.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] bad_alloc@lemmy.dbzer0.com 52 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Companies should be required to maintain a stash of plans and source code which is automatically released upon the company stopping operations, unless the IP is bought.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 43 points 2 months ago

unless the IP is bought

It's always bought on liquidation. The creditors require it to be sold to legally satisfy them. What's worse is that the IP may only be licensed in the first place.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Novell was re-awarded OS code which it sold -- a term I use based on talking to people in the room on both the seller and buyer side of the negotiation table at the time, but merely second-hand knowledge. Novell was awarded ownership as the fact of the sale became a poker chip in a US$5bn lawsuit that could be refuted to give an advantage to one adversary in that lawsuit.

Novell hasn't done a thing with it in 20 years. The code is essentially dead because it would cost too much to restart and update.

This was how the original Unix died, and doesn't violate your plan. Counterexampled?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 51 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Finally people are starting to ask the questions that actually matter.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Seraph@fedia.io 35 points 2 months ago (24 children)

As long as they're a smartphone on wheels the answer is no.

We want real cars again, even if electric.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago (13 children)

My smartphone still works without service. Just as a tablet/computer device. Cars should be the same.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
[–] tabular@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago

It's not your car if someone else controls it.

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago (20 children)

This is not just something that can impact EVs. NFC door locks, smart infotainment, displays for gauges. None of that is EV specific these days.

These cars were clearly not designed to work without cloud connectivity and or an authenticated account. That seems bonkers. China is huge and has lots of remote areas. How were these cars going to work when they couldn’t phone home?

IMHO, a lot of cars have gone way overboard with “smart” features, but this manufacturer’s problems are the result of cutting corners and not designing for some common use cases.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] manxu@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Cars are the tip of the iceberg. What about smart home appliances, like garage door openers, or door locks? They all come with their stupid apps, and once the company is dead, suddenly your home stops working.

We really need mandatory standards: post APIs for client-server connectivity and make the connection URL configurable.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 25 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

Looking at Aging Wheels YouTube channel with his fleet of non working Wheegos, the answer is no, they won't.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago (4 children)

cars? what about all those charging stations that don't have payment by card and require you to setup an account through a mobile app like what kind of cuntery is that.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] 0x0@programming.dev 20 points 2 months ago (7 children)

That's cool and scary but it also (mostly) applies to most new ICE cars as well.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] tudor@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

As long as the car isn’t dependent on an Internet connection or the manufacturer’s server and the ports aren’t proprietary, I think you’re good. I expect a car to have these.

[–] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

Woah woah woah. You can't "disrupt" the car industry without a subscription based model that can brick your hardware at a moments notice.

[–] Michal@programming.dev 13 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Why wouldn't they? You plug it in and keep driving. It's not any different from petrol cars.

[–] Rinox@feddit.it 27 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Unless they have a massive infotainment system that requires cloud services to work properly or the main way to access your car is the app on your phone (and other shit like this).

Also who's gonna guarantee spare parts in case something breaks down in 5 years time? Will I be able to fix their car or will it be a paper weight?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lucario_owo@yiffit.net 19 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Take a look at the YouTube channel "Aging Wheels", they have acquired and daily driven a Coda, an EV that the parent company shut down, you can see their journey in the channel.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FleetingTit@feddit.org 14 points 2 months ago

They might keep driving, but some infotainment features (or even other features that are tied to subscriptions) might stop working.

Depending on the implementation of these features that could mean the car constantly shows error messages, or the infotainment freezes, or in the worst case the car won't even start or charge.

Some of these concerns are true for newer cars of traditional manufacturers: what happens when their online services become unavailable?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm pissed that even non-ev vehicles make it impossible/expensive to swap out the head unit for something you like.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›