this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
188 points (98.5% liked)

TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name

4459 readers
945 users here now

/c/TenFoward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!

Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.

~ 1. No bigotry. This is a Star Trek community. Remember that diversity and coexistence are Star Trek values. Any post/comments that are racist, anti-LGBT, or generally "othering" of a group will result in removal/ban.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 3. Use spoiler tags. This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it's free game.

~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon'

~ 8. No Political Upheaval. Political commentary is allowed, but please keep discussions civil. Read here for our community's expectations.

Fun will now commence.


Sister Communities:

!startrek@lemmy.world

!memes@lemmy.world

!tumblr@lemmy.world

!lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!


Creator Resources:

Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)

Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
188
Nailed It! (dubvee.org)
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by ptz@dubvee.org to c/tenforward@lemmy.world
 

I may not know much about warp theory, but I do know the Nebula Class looks ridiculous.

Imagine the TNG opening but with the Nebula Class Enterprise D zooming across and also the theme is played on a tuba.

all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SARGE@startrek.website 30 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I fucking love all the kitbash ships and shuffled part ships.

Especially the ugly kitbashes.

I always thought the nebula class was neat. The mission pod is cool. Being able to swap out for combat or sensors or whatever else you need by heading to a space dock, pressing a few buttons and waiting for the worker bees to swap them out in half an hour or less (or your dilithium back)

[–] vithigar@lemmy.ca 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I love the Nebula-class and I will stand with you against the slander in this comment section.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 6 points 6 months ago

Some people make it obvious they never built model ships (possibly in bottles) when they were young.

[–] teft@lemmy.world 29 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Kitbashing is a time honored tradition. I just assumed everyone who works at Utopia Planitia really loved model making as kids.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 24 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

True, true.

But the Nebula Class looks like either a Galaxy Class assembled while drunk or they never unpacked it from its shipping configuration:

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Flat-packed starships

A study model prototype of the USS Excelsior with four warp nacelles.

[–] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Did nobody else make ships in bottles when they were boys?

[–] Jimbo@yiffit.net 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

I did. I really did.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

I was never a boy.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

I feel like Mariner would say something like, "No, why would I waste time doing that when I could just replicate one?"

[–] YaDownWitCPP@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

One or two. Had to stop when I became a girl though (for obvious reasons).

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

No, what were the reasons?

[–] Mwallerby@startrek.website 20 points 6 months ago (1 children)

And of course if they'd given it saucer separation that wouldn't look even more goofy, nope, not at all

[–] teft@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

You look like ET

[–] Clepsydrae@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I opened the link on my phone and it scaled the images horizontally. Squart Class:

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 7 points 6 months ago

It looks like a real life version of a chibi version of the anime version of the enterprise D.

And I'm not sure how I feel that that's my first thought...

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There's a few other derpy ships. This ship in Prodigy is apparently Centaur Class. What is being done to it is probably for the best.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 14 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I realize the AI upscaler used here had a very bad case of pareidolia, but I, too, always thought the Klingon battle cruisers looked like derpy smiley emojis wearing sombreros:

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

When I see Voyager all I can see is :D in the deflector dish. Looks more like :0 at this angle, though.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Janeway: “It’s right behind me, isn’t it?”

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

I kind of.. want one.

[–] SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Wasn’t the inspiration for this also the Northrop Grumman E-2 Hawkeye since they’re meant to be science craft with large sensor arrays?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grumman_E-2_Hawkeye

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I have no idea, but that would definitely be plausible.

[–] SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

I always thought so but can’t find where I may have read that from… maybe just an assumption I made because it looks like it and they are often used in science/sensor roles

[–] SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Found it. The AWACS.

https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Nebula_class_model

The design upgrades for the Nebula-class were done by Mike Okuda and Rick Sternbach and the model was built by Greg Jein. In Drexler's blog, Okuda elaborated further: "As so often happens with this kind of project, we didn't give Greg enough time to accomplish this, so we decided to retain the original scale of the Galaxy-class ship saucer. I suggested the original 'AWACS' pod in response to a producer's observation that the ship might otherwise appear unbalanced. Unfortunately, the AWACS pod didn't look as elegant as we had hoped in "The Wounded".

[–] clearedtoland@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Pffft. Who needs an owners manual when you have red shirts to sacrifice while you learn?

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Red shirts are command by TNG era. It would be the gold shirts (engineering and ops) that would be sacrificed to the dark lord of starship construction.

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Thinking about it, I feel like having the nacelles as close to the middle of the ship might actually make more sense. If they're creating a warp bubble around them, it would be centred on the nacelle, so having it centrally placed would balance the 'amount' of warp bubble around the entire ship

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 2 points 6 months ago

The old school justification for ship designs having the nacelles far from crew-occupied parts of the ship was that they were powerfully dangerous. That really isn't a thing any more, which has freed the model designers to make some creative new shapes, which is pretty cool. (I still love the iconic old designs though.)