this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2024
120 points (97.6% liked)

politics

19107 readers
2644 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

If you're an American, you can be one too

all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 36 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Pretty much what it takes. A presidential campaign is a billion-dollar expense. Without broad support, they're left depending on billionaires, and that's whose policies they implement.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago

Citizens United is fucking us all in so many ways.

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 25 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm one. I'm kicking her $40 bucks a month.

Gotta protect my union from Project 2025.

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

but you didnt hear that unions are a little gay?

[–] JoMomma@lemm.ee 12 points 2 months ago
[–] odelik@lemmy.today 8 points 2 months ago

That's an impressively even distribution with gentle slopes.

I wonder what this would look like with the the ages normalized.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I tried, but it doesn’t seem worth the cost. Anyone know a way to donate without getting on their mailing list?

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Use a throwaway email address. You'll get stuff via USPS, but not too much of it.

Do not give them your phone number.

[–] Devdogg@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

Hahahahahahah!!!!

[–] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You could mail an envelope of cash to me and I'll make sure Harris will get it. 🤔

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Sure, post your full legal name, address, phone number, and social security number

[–] halloween_spookster@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

How did they determine this data?

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Methodology

The Times’s analysis is based on Federal Election Commission filings from the Democratic fund-raising platform ActBlue, with the names, addresses and ZIP codes of people who gave to the Harris for President campaign, the Harris Action Fund and the Harris Victory Fund (known as Biden for President, the Biden Action Fund and the Biden Victory Fund before July 21) online.

A donor was determined to be a prior Biden donor if a donation from their unique combination of first name, last name and ZIP code had been made from April 25, 2023, when the Biden campaign was announced, to July 20, 2024.

In the analyses of age and gender, this data was combined with voter registration records obtained from each state and provided by L2, a nonpartisan voter data vendor. These databases combine data on all registered voters. Records were matched by each donor’s first name, last name and ZIP code, plus address in many cases. Around 70 percent of donors from the F.E.C. filing could be matched to the voter file.

In the analyses of income, education level and race, records were matched with demographics for ZIP code tabulation areas from the census bureau’s 2022 five-year American Community Survey, using data files from Social Explorer.

The numbers cited here are estimates that could be affected by out-of-date voter registration records, duplicate names in the same ZIP code or other factors.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -4 points 2 months ago

New York Times - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for New York Times:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/08/22/us/elections/kamala-harris-donors.html?unlocked_article_code=1.E04.LCIH.AO38k_gQ5Pla
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support