this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
442 points (97.2% liked)

News

23387 readers
2110 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 237 points 3 months ago (7 children)

Headline suggests that the Democrats - who are currently more united than they've been since probably Kennedy - aren't united.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 32 points 3 months ago (8 children)

If you think that's baffling, take a look at Nate Silver's column:

https://www.natesilver.net/p/tim-walz-is-a-minnesota-nice-choice

I'm not sure if Nate is talking about the same Walz and Shapiro as the rest of us.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 37 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Shapiro has Israel baggage that I am so glad I don't have to hear about online for the next forever. Kelly had a messy divorce that I'm sure nobody wants to have dredged up. Walz seems relatable to a great number of people.

Plus, he drives a 1979 IH Scout.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 13 points 3 months ago

Shapiro's Israel issue would have been a toss-up issue. Some independents wanted him to be very pro-Israel, others no so much. Probably wouldn't have made a huge difference.

On the other hand, might have made a difference in Michigan among the large muslim minority who may not have come out to vote.

I really just hope Walz is not going to be another Kaine.

[–] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 24 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I remember listening to a podcast they would make, a lady and a guy and Nate Silver. I think it's that podcast that makes me not really like him or his ideas aside from the numbers and the team he surrounds himself with. I look at 538 and I trust it for the most part but if it has Silver attached to it, I think of it as editorial

[–] BedbugCutlefish@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

538 no longer has Nate Silver or his model; Disney bought it and fired him like a year ago or so.

Still, I agree; I don't like his politics, but his analysis of polls and numbers is probably the best out there.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vividspecter@lemm.ee 9 points 3 months ago

He seems to have gotten more right-wing in recent years, although he doesn't talk about it too explicitly (maybe he was always like that and I just didn't know).

I remember him downplaying the J6 insurrection during one of the podcasts which was the point where I lost a lot of respect for him, and frankly him leaving isn't a big loss as he seemed to be just over election modelling in general by the end.

[–] skittle07crusher@sh.itjust.works 23 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Lmao, Silver is equating a Walz pick to a TIM KAINE pick.

I’m sorry, I can’t read any further with sooo much cope.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, it doesn't get much better. Silver's great when it's just about numbers, but less so when it's slightly more intangible. This column might be the peak example.

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Hes Theil funded at this point. Dont expect a neutral voice anymore.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

You should read through the comments on that post.

Almost NONE of Silvers subscribers are having it.

This just a way off base miss of Silvers.

Believe the numbers, doubt the pundit.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Silver's claim that Walz is a Tim Kaine pick is just dead on arrival. I'm sorry, I appreciate his actual model, but his argument here is just too speculative.

[–] BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I typically like Nate, but today's column seemed sloppy. I don't see how Walz is the "safe" choice - he's further left than Shapiro. I also didn't get what he was saying about Minnesota values not translating. I think Walz was a bold pick and I'm happy with the choice.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] JaymesRS 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee 47 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 45 points 3 months ago (1 children)

He can defiantly crush Vance and speak to the Midwest. I think that is what matters.

[–] jwt@programming.dev 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Defiantly definitely works too ;)

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

While still being a genuinely good person.

Also, he isn’t shy about cutting through the bullshit to the issues. Like this clip. “Oh what a monster!”…

[–] psmgx@lemmy.world 35 points 3 months ago (11 children)

Dude got nominated like an hour ago. How are they putting out articles like this?

Like the average person ain't even got home from work on the east coast.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 36 points 3 months ago (1 children)

People had a week to draft one for each VP candidate being vetted.

Like Carter’s obituary - write it now so you can publish it early.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago (4 children)

They are preloaded and ready to go. They probably have other articles in the can for the other names that were being considered as well.

It might also surprise you to know that major news networks pre-tape celebrity obituaries just in case that person dies.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 3 months ago

Walz has been known to be on the shortlist for at least a week, probably longer. They probably had articles like this in the pipeline for all the likely candidates.

[–] criticon@lemmy.ca 14 points 3 months ago

The best one I found is this opening from cnn:

Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz hadn’t been in the top tier of potential running mates for Kamala Harris until the past few weeks.

No shit!

https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/06/politics/math-behind-harris-walz-vp-pick/index.html

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The campaign worked with news outlets and let them write the articles, under what's often called an embargo. Basically, in exchange for holding the story until it's announced, the journalists can write the story ahead of time.

Source: dated a girl who worked in PR and a girl who was in media relations for a large company

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 months ago

Presumably various media outlets had articles prepared ahead of time for each of the possible outcomes.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] bazus1@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago

Donald Trump is ideally suited to expand Kamala Harris' appeal across the ideological spectrum.

[–] Sputnik34@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago

I legit forgot what it feels like to have HOPE

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Yep.

Harris has an edge to her, she’s quick-smart (imo this is good for presidential material) and that may be off putting to some (because women aren’t supposed to be like that , right?), however, Walz is straight up good guy and he can balance out the ticket as far as presentation.

My only concern about Walz is that he presents so strongly as a good guy/dad figure that, should Harris be elected, the typical behavior is to put the VP up for election upon the incumbent’s term(s) expiring. Does he have the presence to be the potential presidential candidate in the future?

[–] Xanis@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Well now that depends: Would being in the VP chair help mould him into someone who can rise to the challenge?

Who knows!

For now let's not worry about that. Seriously. Trump bad. Beat first. Big unga bunga, big stick, big smack. Don't let go of that question, just file it away for a bit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Why is that even a concern? Frankly, they should be pushing for legislation that disqualifies senior citizens anyway and he'll be almost 70 when his turn comes around. Just retire, guys. You've earned it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

People really do think that quick-smart is not a good thing in women???!

If so, I bet it's just the ones who take it really badly when they're outsmarted.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Misogynists think that, and there are a lot of them out there.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bender223@lemmy.today 17 points 3 months ago
[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Tim Walz for America's Dad

Gooood morning USA, I got a feeling like it's gonna be a wonderful day.

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

He was the best choice. They can win and we can finally force trump to account.

load more comments
view more: next ›