this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
23 points (89.7% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3420 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

What an utter piece of shit.

all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] krayj@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Any system capable of manipulating the outcomes of international conflict needs to become property of the government via eminent domain...especially if that system is used...especially if used by an entrepreneur operating without oversight.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can we start treating billionaires as rogue nations unto themselves? Because that's frankly how they act.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I think technically they're more "terrorists" than "rogue nations"

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Fucking charge him with something. This is insane... If it's not treason, it sure as hell is undermining the billions of dollars in aid were sending Ukraine. We've sent 76 billion dollars so far.

[–] MrBusinessMan@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Stop trying to tell a private citizen and businessman what he can and can’t do with his own business

[–] Meowoem@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago

Exactly, you can't have your cake and eat it - if we want to live in a sane and moral world we shouldn't let private citizens own things that are important, especially not satellite infrastructure

[–] Hiccup@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

Elon is not the president, a leader, the military, nor a government. This parasite should be in a prison or a brig at the very least. This is fucking treason.

[–] dimath@ttrpg.network 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wow, this thread. All he did was switching off his satellite network though, not somehow sabotaged the operation.

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All the doctor did was switch off life support 🤷‍♂️ it's not like they forced the patient's body to shut down.

Real "Stanly was attacked by his own heart" vibes.

[–] dimath@ttrpg.network -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But it's more like it's doctor's own life support system and the patient connected himself to it.

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

imagine being so brainwashed that you think owning the life support machine morally entitles you to decide who is kept alive with it.

[–] spitfire@infosec.pub -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Imagine being so brainwashed that you think since someone else owns a life support machine, you have the right to use it to kill people you don’t like.

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Weird how the thrust of your statement doesn't change regardless of the status of ownership

[–] spitfire@infosec.pub -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Nope. In this case the doctors machine isn’t a life support system, it’s more like an xray machine. The ownership remains the doctors the entire time. The doctor chooses to stop a patient who wants to use the machine to kill another patient.its his machine to begin with. The ONLY morally correct decision is to not allow it. Get mad at the doctor all you want, at the end of the day you’re advocating for murder.

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You honestly think who owns the tool being used changes the morality of murder?

Nevermind that we're actually talking about war between nation states, not a doctor stopping a hospital patient from, erm, repeatedly shooting someone else with X-ray radiation?

What a silly allegory you've come up with

[–] spitfire@infosec.pub 0 points 11 months ago

Lol the ownership of the tool is not at what the point is. The point is that you and many others think Elon is somehow obligated to assist Ukraine in killing Russians with his tools. Not only is he not obligated, he is morally obligated to NOT help them. The morality of murder doesn't change, the only thing changing is the vast majority of brain washed peons who think Elon is somehow responsible for Ukrainian deaths. I changed the tool to x-ray because in this case, Starlink is not a tool that is designed to kill or keep alive, only aide in communication. In this situation, Ukraine wanted to use this tool to kill. Fuck anyone that thinks this is okay. Fuck anyone knocking elon for denying it. Unlike the vast majority of users here, I am an actual combat vet who has experienced these things first hand. It's easy for anyone to sit behind a computer desk and dehumanize people because of their country. No different than the piece of shit politicians making money off the backs of these murders.

If you can't see this point or comprehend these allegories then perhaps you're part of the problem.

[–] dimath@ttrpg.network -1 points 1 year ago

Good argument, but where do you draw the line? You can save someone right now by an act of a good will, but do you do it?

[–] koljarhr@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well, the USA and EU also attach conditions on delivered weapons - not to be used against targets in Russia. Also, maybe he is afraid of Russians shooting down his satellites, as they threatened to do.

[–] atyaz@reddthat.com 0 points 1 year ago

It seems like privatization is working out great for us 👍

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I know it's an anathema to most in the US but the government needs to step up and take Starlink and Space X off Musk for a fair price. He's way too unstable to be trusted with tech that important.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Is this not treason? Like legitimately, technically.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago

It may be a violation of the Logan Act, which makes it illegal for private citizens to interfere with foreign relations.

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

This is a great article on the subject posted recently:

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/08/28/elon-musks-shadow-rule

[–] HuddaBudda@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago

Throw him in jail. That's it, an individual has disengaged from America elected leadership to act as an independent agent. Also known as: a spy.

Like is this even a debate? Any citizen that did this would be in a CIA black site hoping they got to see their family again.

[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com -1 points 1 year ago

That's why he's a billionaire: no sense of ethics or morality. Dude has outgrown the moral demands of the invisible hand since he's its undeniable winner. So, like...why should he not interfere in war?

[–] muzzle@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

But the truly galaxy brain move is in this article:

After CNN’s reporting, Musk reversed course, tweeting “the hell with it … we’ll just keep funding Ukraine govt for free.”

Gwynne Shotwell, Musk’s president at SpaceX, was livid at Musk’s reversal, according to Isaacson.

“The Pentagon had a $145 million check ready to hand to me, literally,” Isaacson quotes Shotwell as saying. “Then Elon succumbed to the bullshit on Twitter and to the haters at the Pentagon who leaked the story.”

[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Musk is a war criminal. This is a crime against humanity.

[–] Harrison@ttrpg.network 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's neither of those things. Words have meanings, and legal terms have very specific meanings.

[–] SamboT@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

Hey look a rational person.

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 year ago

This makes Musk a foreign agent by definition, unwitting, semi-witting or otherwise this is textbook foreign agent behavior.

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz -1 points 1 year ago

If true, my respect for Musk just dropped a .... well, none at all. It would be totally in character.

[–] MrBusinessMan@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

Thank goodness for our titans of industry. Musk saves the planet yet again by averting nuclear war! What will he accomplish next?

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz -1 points 1 year ago

I mean if a person does anything directly affecting a war (for any side) I'd say that person is a wartime volunteer.

Wartime volunteers that have taken up arms are a absolutely viable target for military strikes.

Just saying 🤷‍♂️

[–] zcd@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago

So there is an Elon piss-tape kompromat?

[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com -1 points 1 year ago

If he's not careful the US will simply nationalize SpaceX. It's not going to happen in the next couple of years, but this kind of shit will cause it to happen eventually.

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com -1 points 1 year ago

What a fucking douche. As usual.

“How am I in this war?” Musk asked Isaacson. “Starlink was not meant to be involved in wars. It was so people can watch Netflix and chill and get online for school and do good peaceful things, not drone strikes.”

[–] Yepthatsme@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago

Throw that fuck in prison and nationalize all his shit.

[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago

Muskovite belongs in prison with the other russian war criminals.

[–] Hegar@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago

No crazy person should be allowed to have this much power. Starlink should be nationalized, and instead of a payout Elon can go to jail for all that market manipulation he's constantly getting away with.

[–] Venomnik0@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

“Starlink was not meant to be involved in wars. It was so people can watch Netflix and chill and get online for school and do good peaceful things, not drone strikes.”

Yes my satellite that is actively being used in a war should be designed only for Netflix and chill.

[–] Ubermeisters@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 year ago

Smells like a war crime to me

[–] downpunxx@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago
[–] WuTang@lemmy.ninja -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't know why he gave them internet in first place. UA infrastructures are not impacted, you can even watch TV or IPTV.

Can we recall that only the north east border of Ukraine is under attack, can't we ?

[–] blazera@kbin.social -2 points 1 year ago

From the moment he gutted 80% of twitter staff very soon after a secret meeting with Putin, its all been pretty obvious Musk is a Russian asset. Twitter helped rally international support for Ukraine and he hasnt been subtle in sabotaging it

[–] Spooty@lemmy.ml -4 points 1 year ago

The totality of evidence for this is "a drone stopped working for a bit". It's just baseless waffle.