this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2024
858 points (98.9% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3268 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tryptaminev@lemm.ee 132 points 2 months ago (12 children)

Despite his efforts, Dolan’s message did not gain enough traction. His campaign, funded largely by personal loans, couldn’t match Ocasio-Cortez’s $8 million war chest.

You people are living in an oligarchy and "who has more money for this season" being a perfectly normal news bit outside of popular sports is completely insane.

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 27 points 2 months ago (2 children)

You realize that "you people" includes you, correct?

Or are the mega rich treated just like everyone else where you are?

If so, where is this magical land of fairness?

[–] Kaput@lemmy.world 54 points 2 months ago (20 children)
load more comments (20 replies)
[–] Tryptaminev@lemm.ee 46 points 2 months ago (7 children)

I do not life in the US. However because of US hegemony and my country being a suck up to the US i have to follow what is going on there.

But in case there is any doubt. The country i live in, which is Germany is corrupt and authoritarian with a complicit public and private media as well as the "center" parties moving further to the right and helping fascism rise faster than ever before. The "liberal" middle class are to a large extent just self delusional racists and the country will become a fascist hellhole in the next ten years.

So if you have the opportunity, please help spread awareness about all the shit happening here too.

[–] fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 2 months ago (9 children)

Feels like the whole world is on the same trajectory.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago

That's because billionaires have purchased SCOTUS. The outcome of a single court case has allowed unlimited money from whomever into election campaigns.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 67 points 2 months ago (8 children)

It amazes me that primaries are held this late in the year. It’s only four months or so until the election.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 90 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Only in America. Other counties campaign for a few weeks. The US turns it into a 12 month fund raising and media spectacular, with primaries at the halfway point.

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 16 points 2 months ago (7 children)

A while back, HR 1 For the People Act promised to remedy much of the issue but it never got a vote in the senate because Republicans held the Senate Speaker until the next congress was formed.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Why make election season much longer than needed?

Printing ballots can be done quite quickly.

And is 6 months of campaigning really better than 2 months?

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Ffffuuuuuuucccckkk no its not better. It's just that our system predated most parliaments, and as such the founding fathers made some stupid choices that made it utterly impossible to amend basic quailty of life changes for our democracy.

[–] TheKingBombOmbKiller@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago (8 children)

What did the founding fathers decide that made it impossible to have short election seasons in the US?

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hashferret@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It's better for the politicians wallets.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Veraxus@lemmy.world 60 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Moderate? Marty Dolan is a full-blown conservative. Why do we keep pretending like being a Democrat means you can't be a conservative? The DNCs entire top brass is conservative. It's a conservative party by objective international standards.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Because the Overton window in the United States has many people viewing fascists as friends and anyone further left than center right as "extreme left wing socialist communist Nazi terrorists".

[–] TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I hate it when ignorant people conflate Nazis and communists. I have argued with so many dumb people who think that the Nazis were a Socialist party, when the exact opposite is true. These people probably think that the DPRK is democratic, too.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 57 points 2 months ago

In the rest of the world. A 66 year old investment banker would be considered right wing

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 48 points 2 months ago (10 children)
[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago

The ones laughing at Bowman’s loss? Yeah, I’m sure they’re crying so hard tonight

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 45 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Good. Anyone described as a "moderate" in the US is actually a conservative at best. Anyone described as a "conservative" is actually a fascist at best.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] robocall@lemmy.world 45 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Good for her. Sucks that Jamaal Bowman lost though.

[–] retrospectology@lemmy.world 32 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, having to listen to Steve Innskeep gleefully break the news of Bowman's defeat on NPR this morning was not a great way to start the day.

And of course NPR frames it as confirmation that voters support genocide, not that AIPAC uses GOP money to sabotage the Democratic party. Their reporting is getting worse and worse by the day.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 40 points 2 months ago (7 children)

I hope people stop believing the bullshit that’s trying to get progressives to not vote or to vote for 3rd parties. Progressives absolutely can win democrat tickets, and that’s exactly why there’s so much propaganda trying to convince people otherwise. Progressives have a lot of political power right now, and the whole system can swing left if people don’t just give up. Progressives giving up is the only play the right has.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] dudinax@programming.dev 40 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What does "moderate" mean, owned by some corp?

[–] 0110010001100010@lemmy.world 75 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Yeah:

"We need to freeze the border and send that message to the world to stop the death and casualties along the way," says Dolan. "The Republicans are right on this issue. But that doesn’t make me a Republican. No party is right on every issue."

On his campaign website, Dolan who has served as managing director at banks including Lehman Brothers, Morgan Stanley and JPMorgan Chase, puts the city’s current plight thus: “Bail reform a disaster, the National Guard in the subway, toothpaste locked up in drugstores but criminals running free.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/06/17/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-primary-challenger-marty-dolan/74074419007/

[–] audiomodder@lemmy.blahaj.zone 60 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It’s hilarious to me that 40 years ago this person would have been solidly Republican. Now he’s a “moderate Democrat”. This term now means “conservative that doesn’t like Trump saying the quiet part out loud”

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

A lot of money has been pouring into propagandizing liberals in big progressive cities about crime specifically. Trying to promote a crime hysteria. And then part 2 of that plan is to recall the progressive politicians and elect in Republicans who will claim to fix everything.

It's had only modest success in actually electing Republicans so far but I get the sense it's a long game. People have absolutely bought into the "crime is at an all time high" lies.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jettrscga@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

Holy red flags, Batman!

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 10 points 2 months ago

“Bail reform a disaster, the National Guard in the subway, toothpaste locked up in drugstores but criminals running free.

Umm doesn't the State have a bigger hand in that instead of the Federal government?

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 35 points 2 months ago

Moderate: Conservative Democrat/I Can't Believe It's Not A Republican

[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I mean, no shit. Didn't she win her first election with 89% of the vote or something

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Arbiter@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

To be fair, frogs are pretty dope.

[–] Arbiter@lemmy.world 44 points 2 months ago (2 children)

This is the wrong post, but my point stands.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] retrospectology@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

Hopefully it's a painful enough lesson he never comes near politics again.

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago

He's swimming in the bank pools, he'll be fine.

The loans are just so he can write that off.

[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 12 points 2 months ago (4 children)
  1. It's a very progressive district, that's how she got elected in the first place. This is not a surprise.

  2. I bet my politics fit closer to the other guy, but I'd still vote for AOC between the two because she has a national influence and disproportionate power in the Caucus. If you're actually voting to influence Congress towards helping your district in particular, AOC might get that done even if it's secondary to her national political project. Some moderate guy in a safe D seat would absolutely never get anything for your district.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 7 points 2 months ago

Now at a greater scale!

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

"No MODERATE CHALLENGERS want to work anymore!!!"

load more comments
view more: next ›