this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
332 points (96.6% liked)

Work Reform

9827 readers
1517 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 85 points 1 year ago (5 children)

$15/hour minimum wage in California. $31,200/year before taxes if working 40 hours a week.

[–] LeadSoldier@lemmy.world 76 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm a disabled veteran in California. I hear you. The government chooses my quality of life and they have chosen poverty.

"Thank you for your service!"

[–] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If there's one thing I've learned from the pandemic is Americans calls ppl heros when they don't want to actually pay them. See teachers, retail workers, nurses, doctors, EMTs, soldiers, first responders, mail carriers, delivery drivers, I can keep going

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] AttackBunny@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago (7 children)

It is very unlikely a single person is having a comfortable life in San Diego on $80k.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

No shit...

It's state averages so it's not going to be enough for the most expensive areas in any of the states. That's how averages work

[–] Bye@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s averaged over the state. So there are places in California where you can, just not in the major cities.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Articles like these are better served split up between metro city areas, burbs and rural. Vastly different numbers that are otherwise hidden by averages. 50k ain't getting you shit inside atlanta and most of the burbs. If you wanna live 2 hours out in the sticks? Sure, maybe

[–] BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Good luck making $50k 2 hours in the sticks, though, unless you’re in Oil and Gas. At least near me, people in the rural areas love oil because it was the first time they could get “decent” blue collar jobs. That’s why paid retraining and/or relocation needs to be offered to people in Oil as Gas as part of any climate action. You won’t get people who used to make $4/hr to agree to go back to that when oil pays then $35/hr.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Nobody seems to get this when I bitch about home prices and low salaries....

Yes I'll just move to nowhereville, job openings: 6, 5 of which are $10/hr while homes are still $180k

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 year ago

This can't be defined at the state level. It costs a hell of a lot more to live in San Francisco, than to live in Tulare, CA. Most states have high and low cost areas.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I’m about 12k/ yr shy, and since my state is on the lower end of cost of living, that’s a sizable gap.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

$14,000 down, $33,000 to go

cries in minimum wage

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] insanitycentral@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 year ago (6 children)

And federal minimum wage is $7.25 or 15,080 before taxes. Which is about 1/3rd of the lowest in this article (Mississippi at 45,906)

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] noqturn@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I make more than the article listed for my state, but it’s unlikely I could actually get by on my own, at least not without sacrificing some comforts like a well maintained apartment, eating every day, and paying my bills on time. Granted, I do live in the city. If I lived in the middle of nowhere my CoL would be lower, but then I’d be unemployed.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Naura@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is a really good source of information by county:

https://livingwage.mit.edu/

One thing that people forget is that minimum wage is a factor as well. In texas a living wage is $14 and living wage of $25 in california. so you’d think you’d have a better cost of living in texas. However if you compare the minimum wage texas is $7.25 and california is $15.50.

For the amount you work, california is a better deal. However that makes it harder for people to come move to california obviously.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Captain_Jimmy_T_Kirk@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

These are significantly higher than they used to be, but nowhere near some of the most out of touch numbers I've seen people claim online.

[–] Dracocide@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The cost of living minimum is $40,000+. The most I've made in a year is ≈$20,000. Something's not adding up.

[–] chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They say single, so I assume they also mean living alone. Being able to pay rent etc on your own without roommates. Still, while I skimmed the article I didn't read all the nuance so I might have missed where they specified their parameters.

Edit: found it:

In Hawaii, the living wage for single workers is $112,411 — the highest in the U.S. — according to an analysis by personal finance website GOBankingRates.com. To determine the living wage in each state, GOBankingRates calculated the minimum amount a single person would need to follow the 50/30/20 budget, using data from Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Following this outline, 50% of income is used to cover necessities, such as housing and utility costs, 30% goes toward discretionary spending, and 20% is left for savings or investments.

[–] ohlaph@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

It would be interesting to compare home costs to income to get a ratio.

[–] phej@reddthat.com 6 points 1 year ago

Why is "getting by" the goal? Shouldn't the goal be to thrive? American exceptionalism my ass

[–] jasonwaterfalls@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I know DC isn't a state but I'm curious since I live here and it's way too expensive.

[–] Waldowal@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

These all have to be after-tax numbers or there is definitely no way.

[–] Parkkid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

64,463 for a single person in New Jersey. I'm tying to reach that goal to make that much. Right now I make about 45,000 and am using as many programs as I can (nj snap, some energy program and more) because I'm the sole income provider for my family of 4. I currently am renting a house from a friend for 1500 and he plans to sell soon. When he does I will be screwed. I can't find rent that low. He should be renting the house I'm in for 2k a month or more. All I want to say is I'm much better off then alot of people out there and life is still a struggle.

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Try having 2 kids in a HCOL. Shit’s fucked.

[–] mayo@lemmy.today 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly how is that even possible. I'm single in HCOL and I budget every item on my grocery list, I cut my own hair, I don't even use the bus and I'm still near break even some months.

But dual income parent is probably better off than single income solo.

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

You make it work. Full disclosure, it’s easy for me, personally. Our household earns well. But for many, there are unpleasant compromises.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Murais@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago

When I lived in the US, I didn't make enough money to afford any of these states.

[–] luckyhunter@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

man, the vast majority of states are a lot lower than i would have expected.

[–] lung@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

While couples can usually find some cost savings by splitting mortgage or rent costs, there is no such discount for single people

Hilarious that the author hasn't heard of roomates

[–] Ret2libsanity@infosec.pub 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Requiring roommates to live is a joke

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] snooggums@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

Or OnlyFans!

Clearly people need to do things other than live on their regular wages or the author didn't think of it!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›