this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
695 points (98.5% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3325 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The GOP is scrambling to find a line of attack against Kamala Harris's VP pick — and it's not going well

Tim Walz has made his debut as Kamala Harris’ running mate, and Republicans are struggling to apply their standard villainization playbook to the Minnesota governor. 

Walz has been making waves for weeks now as a good-natured, relatable politician with a particular aptitude for dressing down the Republican agenda in terms that any voter can understand — and the GOP hates it

Republicans are scrambling to paint the governor-turned-VP candidate as a devilish Marxist hellbent on running the country into the ground — their usual stuff — while leveling a bunch of other really weird attacks. Here are some of their most pathetic attempts to turn voters against Walz.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 257 points 1 month ago (5 children)

LOL if "he gives away tampons" is the only thing you can find to criticize about your opponent, then you're in pretty deep fucking shit

[–] CountVon@sh.itjust.works 167 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Bet they wanted a Shapiro VP pick so bad. It would've been antisemitic space laser conspiracy theory bullshit 24/7 until the vote. Now all they've got is "how dare this man ensure school children have full bellies and necessary sanitary supplies every day."

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 97 points 1 month ago (1 children)

as it turns out, the strategy of "lets force everyone to have more babies, and then when kids go hungry, blame the parents specifically for having too many babies" isn't panning out the way they hoped

[–] CountVon@sh.itjust.works 76 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've always felt that "have more babies but also fuck you for ever having sex" was a bit of wildly contradictory policy stance.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 66 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, I actually get it. You ever seen a toddler jump in a puddle and then get upset that their legs got wet and dirty? It's like that

Fucking toddler logic.

[–] ech@lemm.ee 19 points 1 month ago

That's giving them far too little credit for their cruelty.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This tactic of picking someone that the Republicans didn't expect and haven't had time to build a narrative about is working extremely well.

[–] Tom_Hanx_the_Actor@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

If I put my conspiracy hat on for a split second I want to say this is a machiavellian (sp?) move by the DNC. I'm reluctant to give them that much credit though.

[–] Eccitaze@yiffit.net 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

But hey, now they can claim that not picking Shapiro was antisemitic! 🙄

Never mind the tiki torches and chants of "Jews will not replace us" in the distance...

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Isn't antisemitism a hard sell to Harris who is a Presidential candidate that is married to a Jewish man?

[–] f4f4f4f4f4f4f4f4@sopuli.xyz 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You would think so, but I've heard it on talk radio already. Verbatim: "Harris didn't pick Shapiro because Democrats hate Jews!"

Uh, there's one major party that is so hard-up for votes that they now welcome neo-Nazis to their convention, and it's not the Democrats...

[–] Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 month ago

I mean, I've also heard them parrot Russian propaganda that Zelensky is a nazi despite being, you know, jewish. Logic doesn't really enter their minds.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Yes, Harris, whose husband is Jewish, hates Jews.

I know reality means nothing to them, but it makes their floundering all the more funny.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

They call Bernie Sanders antisemitic. Factual reality is absolutely irrelevant to the shit spewing from their mouths.

[–] Lianodel@ttrpg.network 8 points 1 month ago

From the same folks who were just calling Kamala Harris a "DEI pick."

[–] dactylotheca@suppo.fi 49 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Conservatives don't give a shit about what's actually getting criticized – if they're told that they need to think Walz is bad, then anything he does can be used as an example of him being a "villain". Could be fucking "he donates to charity" and they'd find a way to doublethink that into being a bad thing

[–] kinsnik@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

True, but if only the deep maga cultists are buying your attacks, then it is not changing the election result

The goal of the attacks is either to motivate some kind-of-conservative that doesn’t care that much about the election and might not vote to vote; or to demoralize a democrat voter into not voting

[–] frezik@midwest.social 14 points 1 month ago

In this case, it's not landing because they were already being called weird for similar behavior, and that is landing. It's easy to dismiss the entire attack with a deadpan "that's a weird thing to say".

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 9 points 1 month ago

Well, that’s the base locked in. Now they need to get the swing voters.

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago

all true. and +1 for calling out doublethink

[–] ChillPenguin@lemmy.world 39 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Holy shit. They're struggling to find stuff so they default to "he put tampons in schools", "let Minneapolis burn to the ground" (which it didn't, I lived downtown during the protests) or "rocks and cows" quote.

That's about it.

[–] iamtrashman1312@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yeah, that was weird how they kept on telling me the city had burned down and shit when I could turn my head 90° and see the skyline same as it ever was, nary a cloud or indeed plume of smoke in the sky

[–] Vladkar@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

Luckily we have Fox News and random strangers on the internet who are willing to magnanimously inform us about the desolation of our own city.

Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go scavenge for hot dish in the smouldering ruins of Saint Paul.

[–] ChillPenguin@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Exactly. And I love how they got the whole burning down thing from main stream media that they bitch so much about.

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I lived downtown during the protests

So how's the ghost life treating you?

[–] ChillPenguin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Being able to fly is pretty cool. But I get terrible restaurant service now. 7/10

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] ChillPenguin@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

At one point when he was talking about voting districts. He had referred to red districts as "mostly rocks and cows". And well.... Rural conservatives took offense to it like they do for everything. I still see billboards with that quote when I'm in the middle of nowhere.

[–] poprocks@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

I'm the middle of nowhere with rocks and cows?

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

I'm sorry, I thought not having all that "big city bullshit" (imagine that was said with a comically over the top southern accent) was a point of pride?

Like, literally, I've had family in rural Missouri and Minnesota and shit and heard that exact line before

They're only offended because a (D) said it

[–] Sc00ter@lemm.ee 13 points 1 month ago

I believe he was talking about a political map and how the state was a lot of red counties/ Land area and he said something like, "there's not a lot of people there. It's mostly rocks and cows. "

[–] JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Didn't you know tampons ruin a young girls 'purity?'

I'm sad to say that's probably why conservatives are upset about it. They probably still think you can lose your virginity to a tampon...

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

I mean Vance lost his to a couch

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I say we all give away tampons. At least we're not wearing them on our ears

[–] perviouslyiner@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

"Hey, maybe you can use them to patch all these gunshot injuries that keep happening..."

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Seems like the GOP are doing everything else to alienate the votes of women. That criticism from them wouldn't surprise me in the least.