this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2024
103 points (84.6% liked)
Asklemmy
43851 readers
1700 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy π
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Right right right
and that would be ... ?
Oh, I found the video on her Youtube channel literally addressing this question back in 2016:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVGfzbP7WBY
Comma-luh
...the correct pronunciation.
Did you read the rest of my post? You can't say "correctly pronounce it", and then not give instruction. That doesn't help anyone.
If the video specifically made to teach you how to pronounce her name didn't help, what makes you think I can?
Your original post tells us to pronounce it the way she says it, but doesn't actually show us how she says it.
How did you expect us to pronounce it correctly if we haven't heard her say it?
Because I'm not her. You figured it out and found a video on your own, you clearly didn't need me. Why would I know better than her how to pronounce it?
I didn't. I presumed that if someone cared enough, they would find an appropriate video; that presumption was proven correct. But I never expected anyone to do anything, certainly not to get so incredibly butt-hurt by mild sarcasm.
You didn't link to that video.
I never said I did.
You referred to it retroactively.
Yes, because to refer to it in any other way would have required precognition, which I unfortunately lack. My bad?
That's... exactly the point...
That I don't have precognition? Ok good, glad I could help you make that point! In the future, you can just assume everyone you meet lacks precognition, because it's not real. I know that sounds almost like it's own form of precognition, but it's not, it's just good reasoning.
Nope, not that.
Oh, ok good!
Nope.
That's subjective. It's good for me!
Incorrect.
Heuristic.
False.
π
Try again.
π π