this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2024
103 points (84.6% liked)

Asklemmy

43863 readers
1572 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Is it β€œCamel-uh” or β€œCam-ahl-uh”?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Isoprenoid@programming.dev 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Did you read the rest of my post? You can't say "correctly pronounce it", and then not give instruction. That doesn't help anyone.

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

If the video specifically made to teach you how to pronounce her name didn't help, what makes you think I can?

[–] Isoprenoid@programming.dev 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Your original post tells us to pronounce it the way she says it, but doesn't actually show us how she says it.

How did you expect us to pronounce it correctly if we haven't heard her say it?

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Your original post tells us to pronounce it the way she says it, but doesn't actually show us how she says it.

Because I'm not her. You figured it out and found a video on your own, you clearly didn't need me. Why would I know better than her how to pronounce it?

How did you expect us to pronounce it correctly if we haven't heard her say it?

I didn't. I presumed that if someone cared enough, they would find an appropriate video; that presumption was proven correct. But I never expected anyone to do anything, certainly not to get so incredibly butt-hurt by mild sarcasm.

[–] null@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You didn't link to that video.

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] null@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You referred to it retroactively.

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, because to refer to it in any other way would have required precognition, which I unfortunately lack. My bad?

[–] null@slrpnk.net 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's... exactly the point...

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That I don't have precognition? Ok good, glad I could help you make that point! In the future, you can just assume everyone you meet lacks precognition, because it's not real. I know that sounds almost like it's own form of precognition, but it's not, it's just good reasoning.

[–] null@slrpnk.net 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] null@slrpnk.net 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's subjective. It's good for me!