politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Yeah - I'm calling bullshit at this point.
This isn't reporting - it's just flogging a narrative.
And I say that as someone who argued for Biden dropping out.
Why?
This is how these things happen. You're viewing it as just political, but for these campaign workers, it's a lot closer.
They didn't just realize Biden was bad. This has been an open an obvious secret for them for a long time. And the dam has finally broken and people are talking
Everytime someone talks, more people feel comfortable talking.
There's no way to stop it once it starts except getting in front of it. The longer Biden waits and the more talk. The more it hurts the party
Trust is eroding and there wasn't much in the party to begin with
I agree, the media and the Whitehouse has been covering for him for a long time but now the cats out of the bag and I've heard a couple people say they were covering for him because they feared blowback from the Whitehouse
If its new/ people keep repeating it, its news-worthy.
If its reposting/ rehashing last weeks news, then it deserves downvotes.
If you are sick of hearing the news, maybe log out, take a break.
But the news is what the news is.
How do you mean? Like, you don't actually think campaign aids said these things?
Not sure what flogging a narrative really means
Flogging a narrative - someone has a vested interest not just in promoting a particular idea or position, but in communicating the idea that there's a broad consensus for that idea or position. That's the "narrative."
For whatever reason (generally simply that that broad consensus doesn't exist), they can't simply report that some significant majority of people support the idea or position. So instead, they publish an anecdotal example of it - this particular person, who's notable for whatever reason, supports it. Then the next day, they publish another. Then another. Then another. Then another.
The goal is simply to repeat the same idea enough times that people who aren't really paying much attention will come to think that it must be a notably popular position, since they keep seeing it mentioned.
I have no doubt that an aide said what 's being reported. And I also have no doubt that a determined enough reporter could come up with pretty much any idea at all - for instance, that Kraft macaroni and cheese is the best food ever - then find some aide somewhere who would go on record saying it.