this post was submitted on 30 May 2024
2713 points (99.3% liked)

News

23626 readers
2830 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 223 points 6 months ago (5 children)
[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 139 points 6 months ago (1 children)

In NY, even if he’s sentenced to prison, it’s up to the judge’s discretion whether he has to report to prison while awaiting appeal…and we all know he’s going to appeal.

[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 96 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Well here's hoping this judge is tired enough of Trump's shit.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 63 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Something something historic trial something decorum something tradition and that's why he'll walk free.

[–] Aphelion@lemm.ee 35 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That and the judge is probably terrified of having his house firebombed.

[–] Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago (2 children)

This is exactly why Judges have been so lenient on him. None of them want to go from country clubbing to having firsthand knowledge of the witness protection program.

[–] Habahnow@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I disagree with that. The judges need to be a bit lenient with him so nobody can say that the judge was biased against him. This was sort of frustrating to those of us who saw the judge as being too nice to Trump, but its now a lot harder to say he was gunning to get him convicted.

[–] Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] Habahnow@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago

Yeah, so the fact that he wasn't proves my point. The Judge wasn't showing signs of wanting to get Trump convicted. Compare that to if Trump is required to be in jail throughout the trail, because he was held in contempt. The right would be saying the judge, and this same verdict, were corrupt. That's what they're saying, now but there's less evidence for them to use.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Even a mere 6 months would be enough.

[–] suction@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Don’t know about that, judging by the show Delocated, the witness protection program looks fun. Your own skins bar!

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)

We'll see on July 11th, but most likely it's going to be some symbolic fine or gesture, but we're not seeing this geriatric, senile old man who is also a former president, go to prison, where he would likely die as the country faces massive terrorist attacks and uprisings of dumbasses with deadly weapons, no judge in the country would do that no matter their political leaning if they at all took their job seriously and didn't want to have entire chapters written about them in the coming history books.

House arrest may be an option but that would be seen as a political attack because it would stop him from campaigning and that would go straight to supreme court, which we know how that would turn out. Judges know all this, their hands are pretty much tied.

edit: I can't understand this internet knee-jerk response system that plagued reddit as well as here where people will just downvote a comment to oblivion if they don't like the possible reality it presents. You're not exercising your critical thinking here, you're making yourself dumber by not considering things you don't like.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 16 points 6 months ago

If your hands are tied by the corruption of others, make them do the corruption, don't just preemptively do it for them.

[–] ulkesh@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Sorry but if they have a spine, their hands are most definitely not tied. That’s the problem with the system as it relates to this piece of shit. Everyone makes excuses.

Fuck that. It’s time to show that the rule of law matters no matter who the fuck you are. Maybe if he’s made an example of, Presidents will think twice before breaking the law.

But, I agree that the GOP, probably this judge, the Supreme Court, and Congress — none of them have a spine.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] suction@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Why are we so sure that Trump supporters are going to start major terrorist attacks and riots etc? Sure there will be some stragglers here and there but in general they are too stupid and too lazy to even start organising. If January 6th would have been prepared correctly on side of the police force, ie actual riot police present instead of beat cops and doormen, it would have been over in 10 minutes. If they were truly able to start shit, yesterday’s conviction should have triggered them already. It really shouldn’t keep Trump out of jail when the fear is that a Walmart fat guy in camo might shoot up a Starbucks.

[–] yoyolll@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Everyone likes to circlejerk about revolution or whatever, but for 99.9% of people in developed countries, life is too good to put it on the line.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm saying that people in positions of leadership, from judges to attorneys are not going to want to take that chance and be the ones responsible on even the remote chance that there's any kind of civil unrest. This is regardless of the actual chances of anything happening, it's about liability not probability.

[–] suction@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I don’t understand what you mean. They wouldn’t be liable or responsible if they just did their job.

They aren’t the ones who would instruct people to riot or do terrorism, which would make them liable.

To construct a liability or responsibility out of their duty is what the fascist side would try to do, so I have to assume you’re one of them?

So far I am not under the impression that the government would not do what needs to be done. I think it’s obvious that 99% of Trump supporters are just talk, and mainly talk in anonymity on the internet.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

and didn't want to have entire chapters written about them in the coming history books

So what you're saying is he's definitely going to prison.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago

I really wonder if the judge will call out Trumps behavior, the multiple gag order violations, etc. and use all that to justify a harsher sentence. One can only hope…

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 25 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] randomaccount43543@lemmy.world 24 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] khannie@lemmy.world 24 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] kazren@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] RozhkiNozhki@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)
[–] atx_aquarian@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago (3 children)
[–] TheHottub@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago (5 children)
[–] bahbah23@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Oh damn, I completely forgot about /r/askouija

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

/c/askouija

We have communities here, not subreddits.

[–] androogee@midwest.social 4 points 6 months ago

Here.

As opposed to on reddit.

Which is clearly what they were talking about.

[–] darvocet@infosec.pub 2 points 6 months ago
[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 16 points 6 months ago (1 children)

He was a former president. The prosecution would never have gone to trial without a watertight case.

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Sure, but I still didn't expect the jury to be unanimous and especially not on all counts. Glad they were though :-)

load more comments (2 replies)