their next game was going to be D&D, but they changed course and are doing something else now
Vincke has a vision for "the one RPG to rule them all", and each of their past three RPGs is a step closer to it
the next game is not going to be that master vision but one step closer toward it, with their previous 3 RPGs proving out emergent design/multiplayer, story and consequence, and personal stories/performance capture, respectively
Vincke would like to have this next game done in 3 years compared to BG3's 6 year development cycle, but realistically expects 4 years, as long as there isn't something like COVID-19 or a war in Ukraine to impede their progress

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] mihnt@lemy.lol 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Those decks were for competitive play. They wouldn't let me run proxies.

My moral: Don't give WotC anymore money, ever. Fuck 'em.

[–] Ashtear@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This is why I bailed out of Standard, finally. I've moved entirely into Limited.

I'll still do pay-to-play with drafts of new sets here and there, but proxy Cube is where it's at. My fun-to-price ratio with the game has never been better.

[–] mihnt@lemy.lol 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Oh, these were modern decks. Not T1 mind you, but still they destroyed the value that I had in it to me.

I just hate that at any time they can reprint something and it's pretty much get fucked to anyone who paid $400+ for a 4x.

For example. Or my dude here.

[–] Ashtear@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

Ah, that kind of price churn has been the norm in (lower case "l") legacy formats for as long as I've been playing the game (25+ years now). It'd be reprints, bans, or just plain old power creep. Those formats have been too expensive/volatile for me for a very long time now.