this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
582 points (97.7% liked)

Programmer Humor

32079 readers
181 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mozingo@lemmy.world 38 points 10 months ago (2 children)

This sure looks like C#. I use typeof every once in a while when I want to check that the type of a reference is a specific type and not a parent or derived type. But yea, really not that often.

[–] PetDinosaurs@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (4 children)

It looks exactly like c++ and c# and java and probably others.

[–] morhp@lemmy.wtf 17 points 10 months ago

Java only has instanceof and getClass, not typeof.

[–] Mozingo@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But neither c++ or Java have typeof

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Typescript! Though it's less useful, since the Typescript types aren't available at runtime, so you'll just get object for non-primitive values.

[–] LapidistCubed@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Probably because Java and C# take much inspiration from C++. They aren't called "C-based" languages for nothing 😉

[–] r00ty@kbin.life 3 points 10 months ago

Yeah in C# it has quite a few uses.

I'm working on a background fun project where there's a base class that is for olde style CPU emulation. Where you can derive a class from the base class and essentially design 8bit style CPUs.

I have a separate class as a generic Assembler that will work with any of the created CPUs. But, to be able to do that I need to be able to get information about instructions, arguments, opcodes, registers etc from the derived class.

So the assembler is instantiated with Assembler\ and then it uses typeof to instantiate the actual CPU class being used to get all the information.

So, that's just an example of when you'd use something like this.