r00ty

Oh, I read this John Grisham book.

If they cannot see a verified human gaze they won't let you even load the site!

Yes, the tech exists already on phones. Not sure how they'd enforce it on pc.

"Sorry, YouTube is not available to systems without a functioning camera."? Perhaps with a link to premium :p

When these tools hit their bottom line enough, they will go the extra mile to block them.

The only thing stopping them doing this right now, is that they know it would get regulatory pushback. It has a real chance of causing laws to be made about when and how advertising is appropriate, and those laws might stop some of the things they're doing now. So they sit as close to that line as they can without crossing it so they can keep self-regulation.

The moment they believe world governments wouldn't stop them doing it, is the moment they'll do it.

And in terms of benefit for the advertisers and service providers, it's a no-brainer. Advertisers know that a large percentage of people tune out, or even leave the room when an advert is on. I think it's part of the reason they kept them so short on youtube, because if they showed you that there's 1:30 ad break you might go to the toilet, get a drink, or anything else that takes you away from the ad. If they show you 15seconds, well you'll probably just sit that one out.

An advert they know people are actually watching is worth a LOT more to advertisers.

I suspect explosions from battery chemistry would be too slow compared to what was seen with these pagers, and power derived from an explosive compound that would be this deadly with such a small footprint wouldn't be good for a pager (and probably not effectively rechargeable at least). Not to say if they wanted to hide things, they could install a smaller battery with the rest of the volume made up by some form of plastic explosive. I just don't think there's a battery chemistry in use right now that will both generate a suitable amount of power and also go from stable to boom in the speeds we saw with this attack.

I find it far more likely they had a small amount of plastic explosive (perhaps hidden as part of the battery).

But who knows in reality? Well except Mossad :P

To be fair, at the exact moment he said "All good here" it probably was. It just became very ungood, very quickly.

Yes, but we required the answer in the form of a question. So, no points for you.

HR has been rebranded "having relations" in Russia.

But I've never played smash. What does that mean? Oh! Oh.

I started playing with rust last week (just converting a couple of C# projects so far), and I'm going to say that once you understand that mutexes/rwlocks are wrappers around the actual data, it (to me at least) feels better.

Don't get me wrong, it's an absolute headache for anyone that's acquired intermediate or better skill in one of the Cx languages. The paradigm shift is still hitting me hard. But this was one of the differences I actually think is an improvement in probably most use cases.

Instructions unclear, VPN'd into my own home network.