this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
7 points (81.8% liked)
D&D Next - 5e Discussion
2423 readers
2 users here now
A place to discuss the latest version of Dungeons & Dragons, the fifth edition, known during the playtest as D&D Next.
Join our discord! https://discord.gg/dndnext
-- Rules --
- Be Civil. Unacceptable behavior includes name calling, taunting, baiting, flaming, etc. Please respect the opinions of people who play differently than you do.
- Use Clear, Concise Titles.
- Limit Self-Promotional Links. External links to blogs, kickstarters, storefronts, YouTube channels, etc, must be related to DnD and posted no more than once every 14 days. Affiliate links are never allowed.
This is a new community and the rules are in flux. Please bear with us (and give your feedback!) as we navigate building this new community. Thank you!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Since the OGL situation I've purchased Glory of the Giants and let my D&DBeyond master subscription renew (on the annual rate). Prior to 2023, I purchased all 5e content available on D&DBeyond (I'd download a PDF online of any D&DBeyond content I owned), and now I limit myself to the content that actually really excites me, and I've tripled the amount of 3rd party content and different systems I own too. The majority of my players wouldn't have even been aware of the OGL situation if I hadn't kept them posted.
I actually really value 5e as a game and D&DBeyond as a toolset, and they currently offer no content that I find off-putting. In my case, I find this virtual tabletop more useful to me than Owlbear Rodeo which was my previous preference due to the automatic integration. I'm seeking the most convenient way to offer fun content to my players at no cost to them and this fits the requirements perfectly while being easier for them to pick up than mixing third party content.
When the OGL situation happened, I was fully prepared to boycott Hasbro permanently, then they reversed their intentions and released the SRD under the creative commons which was a huge step of good faith that nobody expected. It's not logical to demonise them after they tried their best to apologise and block themselves from ever doing this again, but it's reasonable to take a more measured approach to their content going forward, and this doesn't clash with that for me.
@Khrux @Observer1199
I mean, I use it, of course. But, they are a horrible money hungry corporation, no doubt.
That being said, so is Walmart, and Amazon, and temu.
And where else you gonna find stuff that cheap?
Like it on not wotc has a lock on integration, just like Google.
And in the end Integration is what people want and will pay for.
@Khrux @Observer1199 but... they only did "the right thing" after trying very hard to do "the wrong thing" for several months, and only gave in when a wave of RPG celebrities threatened to boycott DnD and launch rival products. WotC is not operating in anything resembling good faith. They will do anything to get your money, full stop.
I don't think they understand their customer community at all, much less care about them in any genuine fashion.
...i concur; it's a solid tool for general reference, sharing content, managing characters + campaigns, and this new map tool-in-progess feels like a snap to integrate with that same workflow...
...while there are many legitimate criticisms of WotC or hasbro, as long as DnDbeyond remains a best-in-class tool for what it does, i'm happy keep using it where it suits my needs...
@Khrux gotta be honest, not a fan of someone dictating what is or isn’t logical when making decisions of what games to support.
I only really mean to say my point of view in response to the question.