this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2025
60 points (78.8% liked)

politics

19298 readers
2193 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz -5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

He should have won. He's smarter, more well spoken, has a better moral compass, a better track record on legislation, better health, better administration.

The comments here show pure distain for Biden and I don't understand why. He was better in every single regard and yet the people who claim to support that constantly spit on him at every opportunity. People who act like that way helped trump to victory. You would never see a republican act that way towards trump.

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

more well spoken

Senile on public display including the debate

has a better moral compass,

Which includes full send genocide and ignoring constituents who opposed this, including within his own administration.

They only switched to Kamala for the PACs that refused to give lobbying funds because even they knew Biden would easily lose.

Of course PAC money is no match for actual votes, so after Kamala got her campaign paycheck and told the uncommitted movement to get bent, she inevitably lost.

Yes even in the flawed democracy of the USA, constituents ultimately decide who wins. They didn't even bother lying or pandering to voting blocs for support. They straight up banned them from the main DNC rally and refused to meet their demands.

This is such a no brainer. Trump tries his best not to alienate his voter base which is why his policy is hot trash garbage all over the place, but he actually did the bargain basement job of a politician which is to promise changes for your vote, regardless of whether or not he actually fulfills them.

Biden and Kamala were both content in dropping millions of democratic voter demands and willingly losing to Trump to defend a POS ethnostate across the Atlantic.

Of course they lost every single swing state.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz -3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Have you listened to trump speak? He cannot string together a single coherent sentence. The guy is a moron. The Senile talking point was manufactured by the right and parroted by people like you. Notice how it completely disappeared when it was trump vs harris.

[–] iamanurd@midwest.social 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Is your point that people stopped talking about Biden being senile when Biden was no longer in the race? Because…

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

"This candidate has issues with being coherent. Let's remove him with a younger fresher candidate."

"Did you ever notice how once they removed the grandpa with dementia, no one was calling for him to be removed??? Wake up sheeple!!"

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz -1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

The issue is that Trump is also a senile old person but the issue was framed as "oh well at least he is not as old and senile as Biden" but when biden dropped out the right dropped that talking point and never mentioned it again. Because it was never about that.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Cool, Trump a bat shit insane narcissist who only cares about himself, who can barely say 3 words before losing track of what he was even trying to do. Toddlers have better object permanence than Trump.

Now explain why that is why we should have kept someone on the same path of the same mental leakage trying to win against Trump.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz -1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

OK I will. The weeks leading up to an election is not the time to be criticizing your candidate if you want to win. You should be supporting and backing your candidate if you think they are the better choice. Your support is what convinces others and insulates your candidate against attacks from the otherside.

Because no one on the left seemed to support Biden the Democrats and were constantly trashing him online (which the right amplified and used for their propaganda) the dems made the hard choice to switch candidates and Harris had 0 time to prepare a campaign and narrative. She did an amazing job but she didn't have the time she needed to win.

You can blame dems for running the wrong candidate but I don't think the dems expected their base to be completely suicidal when so much was at stake. Its not like Biden is a danger to the country, he's had very few controversy and has passed a ton of good legislation.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

So when are we ever supposed to criticize a candidate if they're not trying to win a popularity contest?

You criticize them in office, you get called being unhappy who won.

You criticize the policies in time of midterms and people say you just throwing the election.

You criticize them in time for reelection they say you just want the other side to win.

When is the time we can criticize the politicians we voted for, for enabling and pushing forward policies that have actively hurt the people who voted for them?

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz -2 points 19 hours ago

No my point was that when it was biden v trump age was a huge concern for so many people then when it was harris v trump suddenly they dont care that trump is as old as biden and mentally unfit.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

The problem is we watched that debate. The dude belongs in a memory care unit. I still don't know how he avoided being forced to resign the presidency after that.

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Your mistake is thinking this was a binary choice. The reality is that both Trump and Biden were competing to convince people to come out and vote. Not to vote for them but just to vote. Nearly everyone would already know if they'd vote Democrat or Republican, the only question was whether they were going to vote at all. Unfortunately Republican and Democrat voters require different motivations.

For Republicans all they need is a target. Someone to be angry at and blame all their problems on. Trump gives them that in spades. They just want someone to tell them it's someone else's fault their life is shit but that they've got a plan to fix it by making someone else suffer. Trump was only too happy to do exactly that.

Democrats meanwhile want to hear exactly how a candidate is planning on fixing problems. Usually not just any problems either, but specifically the problems they care about most. That could be global warming, racism, the wealth gap, workers rights, gun violence, the genocide in Palestine, the housing market, or something else entirely. That is what motivates them to show up to the polls. Biden (and then Harris) largely failed to do that. Instead he put forward plans that either inched towards solving those problems at a snails pace, or like in the case of Palestine outright ignored the problem.

So yes, Biden is objectively a better president than Trump in every metric except for one. The one that actually mattered. The ability to convince people to get off their asses and head to the polls. Honestly at this point the problem isn't even Biden or even Harris, it's the entire DNC and their milquetoast platform.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz -2 points 1 day ago (6 children)

This section is so insane. Its shows how well republicans are able to completely rewrite history through propaganda. Biden stuttered a few times in a 1hr+ debate and answered every question intelligently but he fucked up his words on one question. Trump couldnt answer a single question and proved he had no idea what a tariff was or how tax works. But Trump got a single favourable soundbite so I guess he dominated???

After his disastrous performance in his single debate against Trump, during which the president struggled to form coherent answers to questions and seemed utterly lost in the setting, public confidence in his ability to pull off an electoral victory imploded.

You can't keep letting the right get away with narrative shifting like this. Even if Trump had done nothing the right would be online posting that he had the greatest performance of all time. Support your damn candidate if you want to win.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Dude, the video is available. It was really that bad.

[–] Kroxx@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's not right wing narrative. After I watched the debate I was pissed and felt like the Biden administration had hid the fact that Biden isn't in a condition to be president because that's what happened.

Trump didn't have any coherent answers but you could at least hear him

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz -2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

What question do you think Biden answered worse than trump? Also do you think that Trump is mentally health?

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Biden stuttered a few times in a 1hr+ debate and answered every question intelligently

We finally beat Medicare.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

Golfing in Afghanistan

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz -2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

yes 1 3s misspeak after he had just provided a good answer to the question. Do you have a single example of a question trump answered better than biden?

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

yes 1 3s misspeak after he had just provided a good answer to the question.

He gave a rambling trumpian answer and ended it with nonsense. And just like all of Trump's cult, you're making excuses for obvious cognitive decline.

He's not running anymore. You don't have to carry water for him,

Do you have a single example of a question trump answered better than biden?

Trump shat the bed too. The difference is that Trump has a cult and Biden has a few scattered diehard centrists. Trump wasn't going to lose any votes that night. Biden did. You don't have the same base. Democrats respond differently than Republicans do.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

You do realize that there are people who can be swayed and when they go online and see the right saying they won't and the left saying it's over they will immediately go to the right.

Trump is successful because his base supports him and acts like he won no matter how stupid he sounded.

People on the left could easily find stuff to support and get excited about and hold their criticism for after the election.

The fact that you think a bad Biden answer is equivalent to a normal Trump answer should be enough reason to shit on Trump and support Biden(vocally). Its over now but in retrospective.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Trump is successful because his base supports him and acts like he won no matter how stupid he sounded.

And you envy that. You want Democrats to be as stupid as Republicans.

People on the left could easily find stuff to support and get excited about and hold their criticism for after the election.

We're not going to pretend a shit sandwich is perfect just because you like the taste.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Saying good things about the candidate you support leading up to an eletection is being smart. Its stupid to say bad things about a candidate you support leading up to an election.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

You will always find an excuse to silence people who are critical of genocide.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I watched the debate and your take is so far from reality it's a joke.

We watched a senile old man say he killed medicare. These were not stutters or missteps. This was serious mental decline on exhibit for over an hour.

As much as I dislike Trump, Biden is simply unfit mentally, right now this moment end of story.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz -5 points 1 day ago

I watched Biden answer question after question giving a policy example of what his party had done on that issue and acknowledge that even though there was more work to be done he was working on doing it then he would give the policy example that he was working on.

I then watched trump ignore every single question ramble about immigrants eating dogs, make up hyperbolic statements he thought might sound good to his audience. In the context of the discussion he made no sense.

You can point to that one question but you need to remember Biden answered the question intelligently and the stutter you are talking about was 10seconds in an hour long debate.

Please read just a tiny bit of this and tell me you still stand behind your comment. https://edition.cnn.com/2024/06/27/politics/read-biden-trump-debate-rush-transcript/index.html

For my sanity.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

During the debate Biden looked like the resident of an old folks home who walked down the wrong hallway and can't find his way back to the common room.

Everyone who watched the debate saw that. It was a DISASTER for him.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

During the debate Biden stuttered a few times(as he has done throughout his life) and misspoke once. Meanwhile Trump rambled incoherently and made up random shit. I don't think Trump made a single true statement that entire debate.

Are you really telling me that you watch a presidential debate and you don't even slightly consider what each candidate is saying? I thought people on lemmy would be a little more intelligent than that.

Dont take what I'm saying as me trying to convince you that Biden was a youthful spirit. I'm only pointing out that Trump is a moron who is able to dodge all criticism and even an 80+ year old Biden is still far above him mentally if you listen to his answers.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It's more about what Biden didn't say than what he said, and as I pointed out in the megapost at the time, he looked like a lost little boy who walked into the wrong room.

The killer bit was AFTER the debate, the post show, he was energized and articulate, a performance completely missing from the debate itself, which shows the lie of "well, he had a cold, he was tired" etc. etc. He was fine AFTER the debate, where was THAT Biden?

Here's what I'm talking about specifically, the look of a slack jawed dementia patient.

https://www.youtube.com/live/qqG96G8YdcE#t=12m8s

He lost the debate 12 minutes in.

Then you compare that to the Joe who showed up AFTER:

https://youtu.be/6js_ICtFtLA

It's a night and day difference.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Why do people hold Biden to such a high standard when the guy next to him is a complete moron. I'm not going to shit on Biden because he didn't live up to this idea in my head. If he makes a better case than the other guy that's enough. From the debate I think he walked circles around trump on every single issue.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Debates aren't entirely about issues, it's about appearances. We learned that in 1960 with the first televised debate between Kennedy and Nixon. The people who heard it on the radio were convinced Nixon won. The people who watched it on television thought Nixon came across shifty, sweaty, and deceitful, handing it to Kennedy.

https://www.cla.purdue.edu/academic/history/debate/kennedynixon/kennedynixonscholarly.html

Largely because Nixon refused the makeup required for television. Nixon lost the election.

If you appear weak, you are weak, and the inverse is equally true. Trump is /r/confidentlywrong personified, but all the people care about is the confident part, not the wrong part

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I know that and I never said or implied they were entirely about issues. Im just trying to find out why so many people who seem more intelligent than the average person ended up judging the debate of rhetoric with zero regard for each candiates answers.

Biden overestimated the american population and should have just called Trump a fat cunt every time he was asked a question.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

"Short fingered vulgarian". LOL. Would have gone a long way.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I literally called it the night of the debate that they were going to overreact to him being sick, and not even talk about the multiple lies that Trump told. Sure enough within a week, he was stepping down.

[–] Kroxx@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

Trump lies every time he speaks, it's the expectation and he met it. That's not news. Biden showed up looking like he was on death's door when he hadn't before, that is news.