this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
329 points (98.5% liked)

Work Reform

9922 readers
433 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mango@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Are you actually interested in the answer to that or just running in here to argue? I figure it'll save me effort if you tell me before I answer.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Umm...good question. I think I came in here expecting to see some braindead takes and prepared to argue against them, but tell you what, I promise I'll be respectful and attentive in this thread. You sound like you might actually have a good answer to my question.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

Here's another time saver. These guys will explain instead of me:

https://youtu.be/g77yCJObYOE

https://youtu.be/jrsRvozsUQ8

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago

I generally don't watch videos. I can read an article in a few seconds, I really don't like having that stretched out to 10 minutes or more while youtubers try to hawk ads and endorsements. Thank you for the response though.

[–] rwtwm@feddit.uk 3 points 14 hours ago

I've only watched the first of these, but having done so, I'm not sure I want to bother with the second. The guy in the first video repeated the (likely true) claim that WFH impacts commercial real estate value and then dunked on a couple of articles about return to work policies. But the question was, why does that sway Amazon's thinking?