this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2023
664 points (82.2% liked)

Political Memes

5413 readers
2927 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tinfox@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago (43 children)

The fact that so many "centrists" have commented on this post to espouse their point of view in long diatribes of meaningless dribble has solidified my thinking on centrists.

Centrists are cluelessly dumb.

[–] _bug0ut@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I always considered myself a centrist... but it was more about how I definitely believe the government should be involved in certain things/industries (prisons, healthcare, comprehensive social programs that boost up the worst-off in our society so they can actually have opportunities, etc) and not in other things (a "free market" that exists under strong, fair, and reasonable regulations that promote competition, discourage monopolization, and provide consumer and environmental protections, individual liberties like identity and community and sexual orientation, how people raise their kids (within reason, of course), etc)...

I don't know what the fuck these people actually are. Right-leaning useful idiots who are too lazy to have an actual opinion so they just both-sides everything and get to feel smug about it. It's easier than reading, I guess?

It sure feels like it comes from a position of privilege where their lives are fine under the status quo so anyone else's struggle is not their problem.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Based on what you say here, you're more left and most closely align as a Social Democrat.

[–] _bug0ut@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I mean yeah, here in the US. Overton window's all fucky over here.

EDIT: I should also probably add that there are probably more nuanced parts of my views that might stick me a little more in the centrist camp, like how the things I mentioned should be implemented, managed, how much reach they should have, whatever. Regardless, I do definitely vibe harder with Social Dems over here than any other ideological stripe.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Shit I label myself a progressive pretty far left as a social democrat myself, which is definitely further left than the mainstream Democratic party who in my view has only marginally shifted center-left in the past few years. Though even in Germany the Social Democratic Party is considered center-left.

[–] _bug0ut@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Center-left is where I'd primarily place myself, for sure (with the occasional excursion into the center or even center-right, which is why I label myself a "centrist").

It sucks so badly that there are very real, very present issues that can be debated by sensible people but that debate isn't happening. Everything has devolved into surface-level culture war horseshit. I think the Right is just mad that they "lost" the culture wars which can be evidenced by who massive corporations - who generally don't actually give a fuck about social justice - are pandering to. The problem is that they're just lashing out and taking it out on everyone. Culture war stuff just shuts the conversation down and you never end up going beneath the surface to tackle real topics. You either end up squabbling over petty shit or semantics or you just leave. Nuance and context are just fucking absent, replace by strict black-and-white ideological stances.

I really do believe that conservative thought has a place and function in society. In my eyes, it's there to temper unchecked change and keep things stable. You will never avoid change outright, but having it happen too quickly or wildly can leave people disillusioned. Unfortunately, if you left it up to some of these people, they'd drag us back to the 1950s... or worse.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hey man, great comment and there's a lot I agree with here — for starters, I've made the same argument regarding corporations and how they have now began catering to the left in terms of social issues.

I think that conservatism is an inherent part of society that should come based largely (albeit not exclusively) by age. The vast majority of this wealth comes from frankly rich old white fucks. In a functioning, equitable society, their voices would be relatively muted or at least in proportion to their population. But the Boomer and Silent generations were so massive they lopsided society. This made worse by the fact that we continue to elect increasingly older people who are out of touch with modern living and frankly declined in terms of cognitive capacity. But no. Instead, they have massive wealth and megaphones pushing their archaic messages that is even filtering down into younger generations.

So this, combined with the fact that while we have age minimums for representing our country, we don't have age maximums — both contribute heavily to our current problems and the stranglehold conservatism has had on America. The only reason things have changed remotely is thanks to the internet, honestly.

[–] _bug0ut@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right on, I can't disagree. I'm very much for age limits and possibly term limits to some degree, although I think there are decent arguments for and against the latter. I'm also open to ranked choice voting and it's cousins, but I need more time to read up about all of that before I can say I have a substantive opinion on the subject.

What you described is exactly the scary lack of ideological balance that I see and am low-key kind of freaked out by. Even if the boomers are starting to decline in number, look at how they were able to whip up just enough of the younger voting-age generations to cause problems. Will that stuff persevere in their absence? I'm under the impression that as time goes on, younger generations tend to hold a more left-leaning streak for longer.

On the other hand, sometimes it almost feels like mainstreamed bigotry and racism and all that trash is kind of gasping it's last desperate breaths, like it's ok the cusp of crawling back under rocks and into the shadows. It feels like there's a lot of thrashing going on in that corner lately. On a societal scale, though, that could take years or even a couple of decades... Plenty of time for another revival to get it back on its feet again.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

On the other hand, sometimes it almost feels like mainstreamed bigotry and racism and all that trash is kind of gasping it’s last desperate breaths, like it’s ok the cusp of crawling back under rocks and into the shadows. It feels like there’s a lot of thrashing going on in that corner lately.

Wholly agree as I've long said this is the rat backed into a corner and lashing out for the last time — at least, for now. It seems pretty clear that overall the modern far-right conservative ideological movement and its hodgepodge of conspiracy theories and anti/pseudoscience roots, embrace of unregulated capitalism, etc. — is near over. This is the make-or-break for them because they know they're losing, hard.

[–] DulyNoted@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Centrism being villified in America is really weird, as that is explicitly championing extremism over moderation.

Leaping so hard onto one side that you cannot tolerate anyone's toe out of line, the party line must be upheld at all costs, is exactly the same kind of extremist shit we go after the right for. Just be better. It's easy to get caught up into the "us vs them", "black vs white", "red vs blue" thing, but it's really not that simple.

The example above is a strawman. I can do it too. One side says "kill all minorities", and the other side says "all minorities should become the new upper class of society." Neither side is actually pushing for either of those things, and we've turned real issues into disconnected make believe.

You're simplifying the problem to the point where you don't even have to think about it or consider a single argument. It's much easier if you make up some extremist shit and then say anything and everything is justified in opposition of that extreme.

[–] AtHeartEngineer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Also when a minority on one side says extremist stuff that shouldn't be used as a blanket opinion for everyone not on your side.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Centrism being villified in America is really weird, as that is explicitly championing extremism over moderation.

When the center lies between two economic right wing parties. As it does in the united States. It would be weirder of it wasn't. It's a false center.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

When the status quo is terrible, extremism is the only valid path.

[–] yata@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They put an incredible amount of effort into creating excuses for not having to take a stance, much more than people who are actually taking stances put into explaining their stances.

[–] Jimbo@yiffit.net 0 points 1 year ago

It's quite amazing, really came out of the woodwork and completely missed the point of the meme

load more comments (39 replies)