thepiggz

joined 1 year ago
[–] thepiggz@programming.dev 0 points 11 months ago

After some thought, my new inclination:

Whether intrinsic value exists or not is unknowable to us, specifically because we did not create our own universe. I can’t say for certain there is value in truth, justice, love, etc. beyond what we humans assign to these things. Yet, I can’t say for certain that there is not. Intrinsic value by its very nature and definition is a mystery.

[–] thepiggz@programming.dev 1 points 11 months ago

Could be. Interesting tactic. Energy does indeed seem to intrinsically exist. Existence does seem to exist. Scarcity does seem to exist. Even shared feelings of value for things that are hard to make a logical case for them seem to intrinsically exist. Yet, I feel unsatisfied that intrinsic value exists. Maybe I mean something harder to define.

[–] thepiggz@programming.dev 2 points 11 months ago

I like this idea of life in general defining inherent value. What if we encountered an alien race that developed completely separate from us and we happened to view certain common things as having intrinsic value? Could we make a case that these concepts of intrinsic value truly exist?

Yet, if life itself were high on that list we might be a bit bias.

[–] thepiggz@programming.dev 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Say, existence = value maybe? Or, energy = value?

[–] thepiggz@programming.dev 1 points 11 months ago (4 children)

A good question. Does value exist without an entity to experience and quantify it? Is there value in a universe without humans - assuming such a universe could exist?

 

I’m new in this community. Anyone interested in engaging with these sorts of questions? If so, share your thoughts.

My initial inclination is that intrinsic value is an illusion.

[–] thepiggz@programming.dev 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I’m a programmer. If someone had an interest they could preserve all of your self-hosted data without your permission. I think it is worth considering tho, if all of this is valuable then it would be ideal if we could get that value into the accounts of people in need rather than the alternative.

[–] thepiggz@programming.dev 3 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Interesting take. I like the light philosophical bend there with the mental value. I think you’re right about that. I have been more considering whether the cumulative data of a platform like Lemmy as a whole is something that we as the users/server should be asserting our ownership of. Or, whether it is effectively worthless.

 

This is a quick follow-up to my previous post about whether or not we own our posts. Any thoughts?

[–] thepiggz@programming.dev 5 points 11 months ago

Agreed. It would be nice if joke comments could continue to find a happy home in joke communities. I’m not really in it for the laughs most of the time.

[–] thepiggz@programming.dev 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)
[–] thepiggz@programming.dev 5 points 11 months ago

Excellent. I appreciate the update and the fix!

[–] thepiggz@programming.dev 12 points 11 months ago

Interesting perspective. Yet, server admins actually do have control over who they federate with. People do have control over what servers they use. Why not exercise this control?

My understanding is that one can post things publicly online but still retain rights, including distribution rights in certain jurisdictions.

I don’t think it is out of the question that the fediverse as a whole could make some decisions going forward that would make it more difficult for Meta (or other official corporations) to monetize the things we post with ads in their clients or through training of predictive models.

[–] thepiggz@programming.dev 1 points 11 months ago

I feel your frustration. Hang in there though. Perhaps there is a way to combat it.

 

Who owns what we post?

 

I like this happy looking guy. I originally thought his ears were his arms - now I just keep thinking of it that way. Like a white Kirby reaching for the stars.

Anyway, I enjoy the app very much and support what y’all are doing.

 

addEventListener accept function references rather than objects with expected methods like handleEvent

setTimeout and setInterval array map, filter, reduce, forEach, etc. promise then, catch, finally

bind awkward

closures

what say v8? hidden classes

fully init objects give me more perf tips

 

If you have a Quest or whatnot and haven’t booted it up in a while, trying this out is worth the sickness and eye strain.

view more: next ›