optissima

joined 1 year ago
[โ€“] optissima@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Cite your source. No where are they told that less of them is better.

[โ€“] optissima@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

The hypocrisy of this when they're chugging power for AI....

[โ€“] optissima@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Nope, it's pointing out that you're moving goalposts.

[โ€“] optissima@lemmy.world -4 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Its not my onus to answer that, that's akin to trying to prove a negative. As the one making the claim, you are supposed to try to prove it. How is exposure to a whale carcass unethical?

[โ€“] optissima@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago (5 children)

You just asked me for the answer, so in this case, you! Your second sentence does imply that you are, as the "not even X, let alone Y" implies that to reach Y you must pass X.

[โ€“] optissima@lemmy.world -5 points 2 months ago (10 children)

That act in itself is ethically neutral.

Why are you implying that legality has any impact on the ethics of the situation?

[โ€“] optissima@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I wasn't even talking about SW here, just how fan is used these days. I'm not and never was part of the SW fanbase, but from what I've seen from the outside that's because all the legitimate criticisms were ignored years ago and everyone that cared moved on from the new corporately-stoked toxic fanbase.

[โ€“] optissima@lemmy.world -5 points 2 months ago (13 children)

claiming to be a big environmentalist and having an animal skull collection is not the best look

Nothing wrong with it if they were collected ethically. Would you find it odd that arborists collect tree trunk slices?

[โ€“] optissima@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago (5 children)

I hate how fan now means mindless consumer these days and any reflecting on the criticisms of a series means you're somehow excluded from being a fan.

[โ€“] optissima@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Giving it to the next generation in your family.

[โ€“] optissima@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Or enjoy the game?

 
163
Dr.Eggrule's Dic (lemmy.world)
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by optissima@lemmy.world to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 
 

Hello, I am just learning more about pocket knives as I suddenly developed an interest in them recently after trying to get one and finding it fell very short of expectations (some cheap Gerber?). I replaced it with a civivi element 2 and have been loving it, but the original buy was meant for my wife and I don't think that the element will fit their needs. Here are their list of needs:

  • The main usage of the knife would be related to their ecological research, so mostly removing bark or cutting twigs for analysis. They also camp, but we do that together so we have the element 2 on hand for anything "heavier", but something to cut through paracord or other fine material. I don't know how this would impact the blade metal type, but expect saps and other organic stickies)
  • She has small, weak little hands, so tall knives (>0.75") seem to be out of the question for comfortable handling
  • 3" seems huge and unweildy to them. I'd think something in the 1-2 range would be more than enough I think?
  • They are still uncomfortable with blades (again, bad experience with their first getting stuck open because of lack of hand strength), so something where their thumb isnt in the way of the blade while closing is a requirement of theirs (slide locks and buttons were okayed, back lock was acceptable). One handed opening is also preferred, as they may only have one hand to work with and, again, weak hands.

And, the kicker, they don't want to spend a lot of money on it (<$100 pretax).

What options could we be looking at?

PS were in VA, so I'm unsure if they can have an automatic (or assisted?) knife, but if it is an option I'd be down to get one/ask more questions about those.

view more: next โ€บ