this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2024
114 points (97.5% liked)

Political Weirdos

1037 readers
1 users here now

A community dedicated to the weirdest people involved in politics.

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] optissima@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You just asked me for the answer, so in this case, you! Your second sentence does imply that you are, as the "not even X, let alone Y" implies that to reach Y you must pass X.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Please answer the question: Why is it ethically neutral to intentionally expose a child (he wasn't passing by, he found out it happened and drove there with his daughter) to such things on a day-to-day basis?

[–] optissima@lemmy.world -4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Its not my onus to answer that, that's akin to trying to prove a negative. As the one making the claim, you are supposed to try to prove it. How is exposure to a whale carcass unethical?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Because exposing children to traumatic things can cause psychological issues and watching someone carve up a whale with a chainsaw is pretty damn traumatic for a normal child.

Let me guess: "Prove that it's traumatic."

[–] optissima@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Nope, it's pointing out that you're moving goalposts.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

You asked my why it was unethical. I told you. What goalpost did I move?