I think it depends on the intent in the groupings. Is it money flow? Then it makes sense. Is it editorial influence? Then it seems to make less sense.
naonintendois
joined 1 year ago
I'm surprised YouTube and Google News are listed as news outlets. They don't create news content, they aggregate it. Arguments can be made about biasing which content is shown first, but not about the content itself, which is owned by the other entities on the list
VOTE. No one should be complacent this time
They don't change things just for the sake of it. They change things so they can point at it and say, "look what I did! I deserve a promotion!"
risc v is not a concern because they could just build risc v chips themselves, likely more efficient than competitors too. I would be VERY surprised if they didn't have a team working on it internally. Arm and quality are their big issues right now.
You would be surprised at how little investors know about the things they invest in. They only look at the money flow. The case will likely go nowhere though since a small gap in processes isn't the same as a complete lack of processes that the lawsuit is implying.
You didn't get any instructions before hand? Is this in higher education or earlier?
I've found diode leads are too thin and fall out or sometimes fall to make contact. You need the matching pins since the have a larger pin diameter
You did your link backwards. The text is the url and the url is set to "these".
That sucks. I was looking forward to having at least some good news this month =/.
Why are the other sources I'm reading saying the opposite of this title? https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2024/jul/01/supreme-court-trump-immunity-claim-decision-updates
Edit: title of this post changed after my comment
I thought it was from him calling in to Fox but having trouble finding it. I saw it on YouTube fairly recently