charonn0

joined 2 years ago
[–] charonn0@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I might have to take up cross stitching.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

From the tyranny of the majority. Each state is equally represented in the Senate, versus the House where states are apportioned seats by population.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 17 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Rather than abolish the Electoral College and merge the House and Senate, I would suggest massively increasing the size of the House. This would increase the size of the Electoral College too, reducing the distortion of the population while still protecting less populous states. This also has the advantage of being something that can be done through ordinary laws instead of Constitutional amendments.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Partner represents and warrants that it shall not introduce into WhatsApp’s Systems or Infrastructure, the Sublicensed Encryption Software, or otherwise make accessible to WhatsApp any viruses

The technical definition of a "computer virus" is actually quite narrow, and true viruses are rare these days because they are passive and slow compared to more modern malware types.

A strict, literal reading of the text says that all other kinds of malware are acceptable.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 5 points 1 year ago

If he doesn't comply with the bankruptcy court, they won't let him declare bankruptcy.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

James Clerk Maxwell. If it uses electricity then it's based on Maxwell's equations.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago

Oh, you're right. I'm well versed enough in Star Trek to have already known that. For some reason I didn't actually think about the episode.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Maybe I'm not fully versed in The Troubles, but why must Irish unification be terrorism?

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The 14th amendment doesn't require impeachment or criminal conviction, though. It's a completely different disqualification provision from impeachment.

For example, members of Congress cannot be impeached, but they can be disqualified under the 14th amendment. It makes no sense to roll impeachment and the 14th amendment into the same category of disqualification.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The only thing Congress can do is remove Trump's disqualification under the 14th amendment. They can't decide whether he's disqualified in the first place.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

"High crimes and misdemeanors" is a term of art that refers to acts committed by a public official which, while not necessarily a crime in themselves, are a violation of public trust.

For example, a president that accepted a foreign title of nobility without Congressional consent would have committed a high crime, but they couldn't be hauled into a criminal court for it.

view more: ‹ prev next ›