States have always had that power. Whether its age, naturalization, or oath-breaking, it's never been up to the federal government to decide disqualification.
charonn0
joined 1 year ago
Time to violently storm the Supreme Court, then. After all, they approve.
I didn't know it existed. I like it.
"A cuddly juvenile pornomorphic bear."
Drink several glasses of water before going to bed so you wake up to pee.
Can someone provide the opposite of the tl;dr? A too short, didn't understand?
“It is very important that there is this meeting, this meeting between men and women, because today the ugliest danger is gender ideology, which cancels out differences,” the pope said during an audience with members of the French-based academic organization Research and Anthropology of Vocations Institute (CRAV).
He's demanding that everyone conform to his narrow worldview... in the name of preserving our differences?
That's some impressive mental gymnastics, even for a Pope.
For example, https://theconversation.com/the-french-revolution-executed-royals-and-nobles-yes-but-most-people-killed-were-commoners-200455 which cites this book https://www.amazon.com/Incidence-Terror-During-French-Revolution/dp/0844612111 (unavailable online as far as I can tell.)
I'd also highly recommend Mike Duncan's Revolutions podcast series on the French Revolution.
It's worth pointing out that the guillotine was primarily used to terrorize the poor commoners, not nobles (who had already fled the country by that point.)
Too soon!
Wait a minute, they will have had had color photography for centuries by 2267. And giant monster attacks will have had not happened for decades, have hadn't they?
Consider the fact that there is more than one grounds for disqualification. For president, there are also age and naturalization disqualifications.
Who do you think has been determining those all these years?