Signtist

joined 1 year ago
[–] Signtist@lemm.ee 12 points 1 week ago

Hardly semantic. The way you fix a broken system is by working within the system to gradually shift it back to normal. The way you destroy a working corrupt system is by literally tearing it down French revolution style. Which path are we going to take? It's only semantic if we ultimately decide to take no path at all, and simply lay down and die.

[–] Signtist@lemm.ee 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't honestly think that would work. They've been conditioned to take comfort in not knowing things. I've seen the thought process unfold in front of me hundreds of times: "If a republican did it, it was a good thing and part of the plan, even if I don't understand how yet." It's exactly the same thought process that they employ for their religion: "God is good and does good things, even though terrible things happen to people all the time that God must have allowed if he exists, there's always a plan, even if we don't know it."

[–] Signtist@lemm.ee 120 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Stage 2 generally means that the cancer hasn't yet spread, except maybe to very nearby lymph nodes, meaning treatment can be very successful so long as its somewhere accessible by surgery and you don't wait too long. Stage 2 treatment is very different from stage 4 treatment, but if you wait, that's where it'll get to.

[–] Signtist@lemm.ee 88 points 1 week ago (3 children)

If you think any or all of these is going to finally get a Trump supporter to lose faith, then you failed to learn the lesson that 2016 should've taught you, and yesterday should've reminded you of - they will never lose faith. He could tell them to literally kill their own kids and they'd just say "Oh, like what God told Abraham! I'll get right on it, my Lord!"

[–] Signtist@lemm.ee 25 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Dang, I just started playing a couple weeks ago. But I guess that means I made it just in time to be one of the people who stop playing in solidarity!

[–] Signtist@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

My wife surprised me by how much she enjoys just randomly saying "Get-get-get-get down! Get-get-get-get up...mom."

[–] Signtist@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago (4 children)

My friends and I still love to quote those. My friend Brian pretty much always walks into a room with "Hey everybody! I'm the new kid - my name's Brian! I like to Skateboard!"

[–] Signtist@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

While that's true, it was mostly just because Mondale was from Minnesota, and even then he only won by 0.18%.

[–] Signtist@lemm.ee 15 points 2 weeks ago

Nobody was chained with 2 options. The options were chosen and rallied for by representatives picked by the people who actually thought about and participated in local government elections. (I'm dropping the metaphor, since it glosses over the process by which these 2 options came about in the first place)

[–] Signtist@lemm.ee 4 points 2 weeks ago

I always liked the name Woodrow, but I hate the nickname Woody, so it's a bit of a wash.

[–] Signtist@lemm.ee 28 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

So... You cum here often?

[–] Signtist@lemm.ee 5 points 2 weeks ago

Would you be arrested? Probably not, but you're more likely to be than Trump. See, committing a crime isn't the only factor that influences whether or not you get slapped with the punishment for that crime, even if it's plainly obvious to everyone you committed it. Another major factor is whether or not someone is going to go through the effort of ensuring you get punished - if nobody does, or if they try, but can't get to that finish line of getting a judge to declare you to be guilty in court, then you walk away scot-free.

So, the thing that's keeping you from being arrested is your relative insignificance. You're just some person, so it's unlikely that anyone will go through the trouble of ensuring you receive the punishment for the crime you committed, even if it's a relatively easy thing to do. Now, if you were to go on TV and say it, that would significantly increase your risk, since now more people are seeing you and someone who gives a shit might decide to go after you. That would be damning for you, since it would require very little effort to punish you - you clearly committed the crime, and you have no way to influence the court to make you harder to punish.

For Trump, his protection isn't insignificance - there are plenty of people who would like to ensure he's properly punished; instead, his protection comes from making it really difficult for someone who wants to punish him to be successful in that endeavor. He has a lot of money and influence, so he can hire good lawyers that can drag out the expensive legal process - something he can afford, but a lot of people who might try to go after him can't. His lawyers are also good enough to find loopholes in the law to avoid punishment, so even if you can afford a cheap lawyer for a long time, he'll likely still walk away unscathed. He's also shown that he has the ability to influence what judge gets put on trials he's a part of, which is another factor that influences whether or not he might get punished for the crime.

Ultimately, you'd have to have a rock-solid case presented by a team of very good lawyers working non-stop for months to years in order to bring Trump to justice, and the only people who reasonably have that power are almost exclusively on his side to begin with. Trump has knowingly committed multiple major crimes, and has shown that he has the ability to prevent them from hurting him, so he knows that he has virtually no chance to be punished for minor crimes, and commits them openly all the time.

view more: ‹ prev next ›