ReversalHatchery

joined 1 year ago
[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 11 points 13 hours ago

to respond to the title, I'm not sure about that. your problems are with the samsung system, not with all the custom roms. I think it's not only graphene that's the solution. It's even only available for a little subset of the phones.

I don't. I run out of memory.

that's good to be aware of, thanks

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I thought you were thinking an AI based code generator klike copilot) does it, when you said the IDE does it.

username checks out /s

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

which country would be better?

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 5 points 2 days ago

I disagree that users won't do stuff on their own. They will, but they will allocate very little time to it, on average, especially when compared to a tech savy person. And that's just because their computer is a tool.And if they cannot make their tool work for what they want to do, they'll find another way. Or deem it impossible.

also don't forget that many don't even have the time and energy

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 11 points 2 days ago

and start off from a fundamentally wrong premise: that people are willing (let alone wanting) to manage their own operating systems.

people shouldn't need to manage their own operating systems, to begin with

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org -1 points 2 days ago (8 children)

not the IDE, its the compiler. this is also not some AI shit, in many cases (not all) the compiler can actually figure out how to do this, because it's not hard, it would just be a lot of boilerplate if written manually.

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 2 points 2 days ago

in my understanding OP was not comparing it to simple wireguard

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

where did you read it that rust obfuscates the code?

you want vmprotect and such for that

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 1 points 3 days ago

It's up to users to know what they are installing.

Except when all you get is an UAC prompt when clicking the play button, without giving you any information, other than that it wants to execute an exe in a temp dir with a random name.

 

Recently there was a post where the OP pitched an idea for a service related to this community. I don't want to go into details but the post's text has shown that maybe there's some misunderstanding around the technology, and a considerable amount of us also thought that it's not a good idea.
The post was removed (noticed because I couldn't reply to someone) probably because the OP felt shame for their "failed" idea, but I think we shouldn't delete posts for reasons like this.

The post created an interesting discussion around the idea with useful info. It's useful to have things like these for future reference, for similar discussions in the future.
This is an anonymous forum, so there's no shame in recommending things, when you do that politely like it was done in that case.

 

Introduction of the first Managing Director

 

The video is a short documentary on Trusted Computing and what it means to us, the users.

If you like it and you are worried, please show it to others.
If you are not the kind to post on forums, adding it to your Bio on Lemmy and other sites, in your messaging app, or in your email/forum signature may also be a way to raise awareness.

view more: next ›