You can't really expect to have any privacy if you're using any online service anymore, so I just stopped trying. Blasting a Samsung phone with all the features enabled and not thinking of going back really.
this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
38 points (74.4% liked)
Privacy
31991 readers
524 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
Chat rooms
-
[Matrix/Element]Dead
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Lineage and a fork, DivestOS are very close to Graphene, and run on far more devices.
The search for perfection is the enemy of good.
I've run Lineage for years on some spare devices. Battery life is so much better without Google Services.
My most recent device (Pixel 5 with DivestOS) is averaging 1.1% battery consumption per hour over the last day. That included an hour of navigation, using Google maps with microG services.
One old device runs longer with DivestOS than it ever did with stock, and the battery has lost 40% capacity. That's how bad Google Services eat battery.
Plus Lineage permits you to use a number of old devices, unlike Graphene. It's good, it gives you far more control than Google.
My final thought on Graphene - it needs to be taken over and lead by some professionals. Those folks act like stereotypical geeks of 30 years ago, arrogant, condescending (I worked with their type 30 years ago, and was a little like them then). They also denigrate anything less than what they deem "perfect". The very definition of hubris.
Their attitude is "if you have a problem you must've done something wrong, why did you do something wrong". Having that experience with them has put me off Graphene permanently.
Edit: I can re-lock the bootloader with Divest, so the condescending Graphene folks are just plain wrong about being the only OS that can do this. I don't lock it, because my threat model doesn't require it. The odds of my phone being grabbed by someone with state-actor-level skills being after me is non-existent, and there are easier ways to get the same data from me.
Yup, divestOS allows for booloader lock though unfortunately they don't support microG. I hope they somehow help upstream their relock solution to LOS. I use LOS for microG instead, since I need stupid bank apps and also for the office some stupid proprietary multi factor authentication apps... If only LOS for microG could lock the bootloader at will (it needs to be unlocked for major upgrades, like on regular LOS), that'd be great.
There's as well CalyxOS, which uses microG and also locks the bootloader, however I do prefer LOS since the strategy from CalyxOS and GrapheneOS trying to deGoogle pure Android in my mind sound like having some limitations, as opposed to LOS approach to be based on AOSP instead. Though that's just in my mind, I'm sure those guys in Calyx and Graphene are the best at security and privacy.
I used to use Lineage OS before without gapps and it worked flawlessly although it was few years ago. Give it a try.
If you liked LineageOS without gapps, than I highly recommend DivestOS. It is a soft-fork of LineageOS with significant security hardening and removal of proprietary binary blobs.
lets start the divestos wave, its somehow rarely heard of but has the support of lineageos with the hardening of (almost) grapheneos, and the principles of GNU.
It also has bootloader locking for some devices, which is a plus.
/e/os?
As someone who's used android literally since the first android phone was released, it's a massive disappointment how locked down and enshittified it's become.
We can all blame Google for that.
I am surprised it took you this long.
The next step in this evolutionary thinking is simple. Buying hardware specs is a fool's folly. I don't compare hardware. Ads and marketing are totally nonsense and not worth even a slight glance. The ONLY thing that matters is what open source projects exist and what hardware do they support well. This is how I shop. Open Source or F.O.
New motto: open source, open purse
Pay to play? Finance to FOSS.
If it ain't free, it ain't for me (if it ain't libre, no way)
All in all my conclusion after experiencing the same: Samsung wants to replicate the same level of surveilance Google has. So with a Samsung phone I need to degoogle AND to desamsung ...
They are all buying and selling that information to each other, any door you leave open will be used by all of the major datamininers of the western world due to their many agreements.
it spreads anti-libre software
How did you install it on a Samsung device?
Samy usually requires Odin3 to flash ROMs – which requires a m$ 4 pane trash shoot OS. I haven't used m$ since the Samy S3 Galaxy era, so things may have changed but I doubt it.
Android Auto has a setting toggle to turn it on. "Unknown" apps or some bullshit.
This is why I specifically pick phones that have custom ROM support. Then I don't need to install gapps and I just use fdroid
to respond to the title, I'm not sure about that. your problems are with the samsung system, not with all the custom roms. I think it's not only graphene that's the solution. It's even only available for a little subset of the phones.
That's only as long as you have money for a Pixel (and most people don't).
I've bought used phones since 2013. The most I've ever paid is $150, and that was recently for a Pixel.
You can pickup a Pixel 4 for about $100.
Surely "most people" are paying far more for their phones.
Pixel 4 is past EOL with Graphene (and google)
Old second hand Pixels are pretty cheap but they don't receive Graphene updates for very long.
The a series is pretty good bang for your buck, if you can't afford that and neither used ones, then maybe you could settle for one of the cheaper Asian ones supported by Divest OS
Exactly - I'm still very happy with my 4a. A used 5, 6 or 7a would be very cheap and very usable.
I got a refurbished Pixel 7A for $220 just to mess around with GrapheneOS. It’s a very affordable phone.
Most people have no problem paying more for an iPhone.
most rich people*
Rich?
So only the half of the US that buys iPhone's is rich?
Or is it they don't know what they're paying because it's part of the monthly bill?
Most of the iPhone users I know are in their 20's and make less than half of what I do... And I'm far from rich.
So only the half of the US that buys iPhone's is rich?
Yes. A lot of people worldwide are much less rich than that.
The biggest problem is the scarce availability outside the US.
Or should I say, that the biggest problem is software (OS) compatibility with other devices than the Pixel?
My money is on the latter.
or want a pixel, or want to buy a new phone. the insistence on pixel support only is frustrating.
Graphene doesn't have an advantage over other options if it doesn't get newest security patches so support is mandatory.
I personally use GraphineOS on my phone and Alpine on my laptop
I've always used Samsung phones but I'm not buying anymore.