Landrin201

joined 1 year ago
[–] Landrin201@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago

It's a terrible idea and it tells me that all the propaganda were getting about Ukraine clearly winning and barely losing anyone is bullshit. They must be real desperate if they're conscription people with mental disorders.

[–] Landrin201@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Reddit refugees on lemmy: it's nice to be on a site that doesn't have lots of power hungry mods arbitrarily banning people

Also reddit refugees on lemmy: BAN ALL THE INSTANCES THAT I DONT AGREE WITH POLITICALLY

[–] Landrin201@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago (6 children)

If premium cost $5per month I'd pay for it, u use YouTube all the time

No way in hell it's worth $15 a month though, their pricing is completely brwindead

[–] Landrin201@lemmy.ml 55 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I genuinely think that advertising should be illegal at this point. It's a ridiculous concept.

[–] Landrin201@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago

The racism is so blatant. Idk how this isn't a civil rights lawsuit already, the whole situation is utterly ridiculous.

[–] Landrin201@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah this is a definition of "theft" that doesn't really work at all with the commonly used one.

Like, if you download a torrent, it was uploaded by someone else, willingly. If they bought a DVD and handed it to a friend, that friend wouldn't be stealing the DVD. But now, if they upload the file to the internet for other people to watch, this class is calling that theft.

Its the kind of "theft" that leaves no victims. The alleged "victim" isn't the person from whom the content was downloaded, no, it's the third party who originally sold that person the product in the first place.

The whole concept isn't logically consistent, but the corporations wrote the laws and get to decide how they are enforced and what they mean so it doesn't matter that the law makes no sense and is punishing people for "crimes" that are, at their very core, victimless.

[–] Landrin201@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Also I'd argue that none of this really matters because language doesn't follow an absolute set of rules. Language is how people use it. If people start using a word to mean so thing it take son that meaning, it doesn't matter if the word makes sense in relation to other words.

A word for something isn't a 100% accurate description of that thing and it never has been. It doesn't matter that a peanut isn't technically a nut, we call it a peanut. Everyone understands that it's a peanut. If you walk up to someone on the street and say "do you know where I can buy some peanuts" they will understand what you are saying with no problems at all.

We spend way too much time arguing over the "right" and "wrong" uses of words. There is no such thing really. Words don't determine their own meaning, people determine that meaning, and if enough people can regocnize a words meaning immediately when they hear it then it is a word with a valid definition. It doesn't matter if the word is contradictory to the way other similar words work, because language isn't defined like that.

Ironically this whole stupid "homophobic peoe aren't scared of gay people" actually proves that the person making that claim does acknoedge that the word homophobia is linguistically valid, because they are acknowledging that it's understood definition differs from what you would expect if you strictly read the word literally

[–] Landrin201@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What us the definition of "hydrophobia" as it relates to chemistry?

I'll wait for you to explain how some molecules are leterally afraid of water.

[–] Landrin201@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

If you get bitten by a rabid animal and go get the shots immediately after your chance of actually dying from rabies is very, very low. The studies I know claim it's very close to 100% effective, which is understandable because of the very long incubation period rabies has, if you have antibodies it doesn't stand a chance.

[–] Landrin201@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

The FCC is still to my knowledge taking public comments about data caps:

https://consumercomplaints.fcc.gov/hc/en-us/requests

May be worth people here commenting about how they are ridiculous

[–] Landrin201@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're not protecting children, you're teaching them to be hateful toward gay people.

Literally nobody is trying to force your kids to be gay. You are trying to force them to be straight, though.

[–] Landrin201@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't forget that those first 5-8 sites are all written by a aithat doesn't know what it's doing! You can tell those apart from ones written by a person because they cram as many keywords in different combinations as they can. Like, if you searched "windows 10 Firefox connection error" the first result will be:

"How to fix Firefox Connection Error in Windows 10

Firefox connection errors in windows 10 are annoying. Luckily, there is an easy way in windows 10 to fix Firefox conne tion errors. The Firefox connection errors in windows 10 can be caused by a few different problems. In this article we will explain how to fix Firefox connection errors in windows 10."

It's infuriating, because those articles inevitably are wrong about the solution, but they're always the top results because they win the keyword battle. I use QWant for my search engine now, and while it's WAY better than Google it still serves some of those sites up when I'm troubleshooting something because the keywords are just too strong.

view more: ‹ prev next ›