Karmmah

joined 1 year ago
[–] Karmmah@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Absolutely. If this rule was a permanent rule I don't think so many people would defend it. However from experience (reddit for example) I think many people know that US politics has the ability to claim and overrun just about every space on the "western" internet. This is not something that really creates value for many people especially those that don't live in the US and I think this ruling is trying to prevent that.

[–] Karmmah@lemmy.world 91 points 3 days ago (25 children)

Instead of complaining can someone who dislikes this decision please just create a community like "AskLemmyUS", post a link here so people can find it and get on with it?

[–] Karmmah@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago (8 children)

What's wrong about it though? The freedom lies in the ability to create your own community that is not regulated by one company/organisation owning the platform. You can go to the place where you agree with the rules and you don't have to live under the rules of someone you don't like.

[–] Karmmah@lemmy.world 91 points 3 days ago (21 children)

By giving people the opportunity to host their own instances and create their own communities with rules they like. This however does not mean that everything should be allowed everywhere. Actually this means that everywhere you go people make their own rules and if you dont like them, go somewhere else or create your own community.

[–] Karmmah@lemmy.world 27 points 4 days ago (3 children)

\ Guitar Solo

[–] Karmmah@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why should it be slower?

[–] Karmmah@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

The current red bull can livery is also nice but the name really sucks.

[–] Karmmah@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Gekoloniseerd!!

[–] Karmmah@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

So Möbius band Dutch flag is allowed?

[–] Karmmah@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

FOSS gives people the option to take the original code and create their own version of it in case they don't like what the original maintainers are doing. With closed source you would be stuck and would have to look for something new.

[–] Karmmah@lemmy.world 46 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It wasn't a culture shock but it made something obvious that sometimes gets forgotten. The "Open" just means that one can look at the source code and copy it to make a new version. There is no obligation of the original creators to support things outside of what they want/can do.

[–] Karmmah@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

That's what I do too. Automatic updates for everything and if I don't like the way something develops I look for alternatives. Those changes will most likely not be reverted anyway and I will certainly not keep using an older version of some software forever.

view more: next ›