Joshi

joined 1 year ago
[–] Joshi@aussie.zone 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Joshi@aussie.zone 18 points 1 week ago

As a sequel to his cowardly failure to condemn genocide Albo now supports the unilateral escalation against Iran

 

Anthony Albanese has backed America’s “unilateral action” to strike Iranian nuclear facilities after a day of silence on the superpower’s decision to enter the Middle East conflict.

[–] Joshi@aussie.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago

To be clear most professors are senior in their field and usually indicates research as well as teaching, I was in a cantankerous mood this morning. But regardless Medicare needs to take access to specialist treatment seriously.

[–] Joshi@aussie.zone 4 points 2 weeks ago

Nationalise the mines and be done with it

[–] Joshi@aussie.zone 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

Yes, obviously medicare would need to increase the rebate and private insurance fees would necessarily increase(as they would now be actually paying for care rather than acting a a gatekeeping mechanism)

Rebate for a short consult with a specialist is $81.55, a long consult is $236.65.

The title professor indicates that they hold a teaching position and says nothing about their clinical skill. Plenty of specialists take the piss and leverage the title to charge ridiculous fees.

In my experience as a GP a reasonable standard fee for a specialist is around $300 with $80 back from Medicare. So yes the Medicare rebate would need to increase substantially but I doubt more than we will save when AUKUS falls through. It is within the capacity of a government with the right priorities. Also increasing the availability of public specialists would be a good companion policy.

[–] Joshi@aussie.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

IMO there needs to be some regulation around this, a simple measure would be to tie Medicare payments to a pricing structure(eg. a specialist can only charge the Medicare rebate + 20%).

If a specialist wants to charge more then that's fine but the patient(or insurance) will have to pay the full cost

[–] Joshi@aussie.zone 8 points 2 weeks ago

Exactly, it's counter-productive to blame individuals for doing the best they know how in a broken system.

[–] Joshi@aussie.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

lemmy.ml is fine

The claim is that it is full of tankies. In fact what you'll find is that instead of a small number of obnoxious teenagers with a liberal world view making obnoxious comments you'll have a small number of obnoxious teenagers with a leftist world view making obnoxious comments.

People also claim that moderation is an issue on some communities, but hey, it's all federated, jump across elsewhere.

Hatred for lemmy.ml is just an echo chamber quirk.

[–] Joshi@aussie.zone 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Has anyone ever suggested engaging Chinese companies to help develop Aussie high speed rail. Seems like an obvious option.

I understand there'd be some dog whistling around it but surely there's no actual sovereign threat if we develop local maintenance capacity.

[–] Joshi@aussie.zone 29 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Escalating conflict with someone with delusions of persecution is exactly the wrong thing to do.

Not knowing the system in the UK means I can't give very good specific advice. You may be able to contact a local mental health network and there is a good chance they will know him. Let them know what is going on in as much detail as possible and suggest that he is increasingly agitated and alienating himself from the community. It sounds like this gentleman needs a conpulsory treatment order or whatever the UK equivalent is.

[–] Joshi@aussie.zone 17 points 1 month ago

It's kind of like providing a highly expensive, and logistically complex service requiring recruitment and retention of highly skilled professionals to provide an essential service to people who can't possibly pay for it is not suited to privatization.

20/20 hindsight I guess :/

[–] Joshi@aussie.zone 4 points 1 month ago

Like every new technology that is hailed as changing everything it is settling into a small handful of niches.

I use a service called Consensus which will unearth relevant academic papers to a specific clinical question, in the past this could be incredibly time consuming.

I also sometimes use a service called Heidi that uses voice recognition to document patient encounters, its quite good for a specific type of visit that suits a rigid template but 90% of my consults i have no idea why they are coming in and for those i find it not much better than writing notes myself.

Obviously for creative work it is near useless.

 

I am migrating from Notion, the Notion plug in automatically saves to a 'Quick Capture' note in Notion and I can review them later.

When I save to Joplin from the browser it saves to the note I most recently had open. Is there any way to change this?

I'm using Waterfox if that makes any difference.

 

Treasurer Jim Chalmers and his boss, and Reserve Bank governor Michele Bullock, were doing their job, calmly trying to calm everyone down. Acknowledging the great uncertainty, but trying not to add to it.

How did Dutton react? He thought: “You little beauty, here’s my chance to put the frighteners on. I’ll go for it.” So he stoked fears that a recession was imminent.

 

"[A]fter the last three elections in which an incumbent Labor administration fought and lost. In every case, the election campaign focused primarily on economic competence, as assessed by perceived past performance. And in all of these, the media played a dominant role in convincing a significant slice of the electorate to believe the opposite of the truth."

An interesting look at Labor vs Lib economic management and election performance.

 

The first Australian response to Trump was denial, then (unsuccessful) bargaining. Now there’s anger and depression as the tariffs sink in. Eventually must come acceptance.

 

Djeran sunrise

 

Treasury was projecting a decade of deficits in then-treasurer Josh Frydenberg’s budget before the last federal election in 2022. So why don’t I remember the people who profess to be so worried now, expressing much concern then? Surely not because debt and deficits only matter when you’ve got a Labor government?

 

Measles was eliminated from Australia. Experts warn US and Asia outbreaks may bring back this ‘heat-seeking missile’

There were 18 cases in NSW in 2024 – up from six in 2023 – while in Victoria there have already been 13 cases so far this year, compared with 16 in 2024

 

Labor has found more than $2bn in budget savings as it spruiks its record in cutting and re-directing former Coalition government spending to fund its agenda.

Led by the finance minister, Katy Gallagher, the government has embarked on a three-year long process of axing or shifting funding to help repair the budget bottom line and free up space for its own spending priorities.

 

JobSeeker has long been far below the Henderson Poverty Line.

...

Labor’s own Economic Inclusion Advisory Committee has again urged it to raise JobSeeker and other welfare payments ahead of the federal budget on March 25.

Its latest report was unambiguous, saying raising payments “remains the number one priority and that doing so would deliver significant economic and social benefits”.

 

Legal experts say Peter Dutton's proposal for a referendum to give ministers more powers to strip the citizenship of dual-nationals convicted of terrorism is unnecessary, as the court already has this power.

14
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by Joshi@aussie.zone to c/australianpolitics@aussie.zone
 

[T]his election, it will pay to keep an eye on independents running in regional and rural Australia. Growing grassroots support suggests they, along with minor parties, will pose a major challenge to the two-party dominance that’s slowly diminishing.

.....

In 2019, one in four voters preferred minor or independent candidates. In 2022, it was one in three.

view more: next ›