That's what happens to many authoritarian shitholes: progressives move and evacuate, loyalists remain. That's how the country gets screwed more and more.
And US is a pretty high-stakes country, so losing that would be very bad.
That's what happens to many authoritarian shitholes: progressives move and evacuate, loyalists remain. That's how the country gets screwed more and more.
And US is a pretty high-stakes country, so losing that would be very bad.
Fair enough! But won't they flip again to start the program?
So, creating a massive headache for government ~15-20 years into the future?
Or what is the point?
MGTOW is absolutely no better.
The most beautiful thing about this program is that it would work.
Various bit flips will once lead to all numbers being in the correct order. No guarantee the numbers will be the same, though...
I'm not aware of how things are on the ground in the US; it's more of a general perspective not tied to any specific country (which is my separate "meh" about strongly America-centric Lemmy, but it's very tangential)
But seeing people actually hit the absolute mandated minimum is indeed depressing. I might expect that waiter's income with tips is normally greater than the federal minimum, so maybe there's a chance not all waiters will agree to work for that, which should balance it a bit?
If you believe no tipping will leave waiters to starve with no money, that's not true. The very reason they are so severely underpaid is that restaurants know they'll get their income from tips.
The less tips there are, the more your employer will have to pay you - in a form of salary that is way more predictable and reliable than tips.
Customers, on their end, will know price in the menu is final, and they won't add crazy extra just so that they won't feel like worst people on Earth.
In my country, tips do exist, but you are not expected to leave them by default and it's totally fine and common not to. The result? Waiters get livable wage and can last a month without ever receiving a single tip (which they actually have, too, from time to time).
If it's not gonna happen, more fascist measures will be introduced - without people's hesitation outside Internet comments.
A solid organized riot does change the course even for most authoritarian governments, even if they happen to suppress it eventually. Politicians should feel that their position is not as solid as they would like.
But the further people prefer to not intervene, the more entrenched authoritarians become and more draconian measures are implemented. As such, the government is strongly interested in making people think rioting doesn't help. This is part of many authoritarians' playbooks.
Except minority rights (including, but not limited to LGBTQ+, especially T), healthy immigration policy, right to abortion, fair economic policy, environmental policies, and a million other things.
If you are from the US and you criticized people living under authoritarian regimes for not rioting hard enough, this is your time.
You still have it easy. You won't be taken into prison for standing with a piece of blank paper. You won't be beaten with batons and taken into custody for reciting Constitution. Yet. Go ahead before it gets there, and may you never see a true authoritarian horror.
Otherwise, all your words are not worth a dime.
Riots always start with local minority and get more and more people engaged.
America is not lost, and has plenty of people ready to take it on the streets. They just need a push. And having others around fighting for their future is the kind of push that can wake such people up. It's way easier to join rather than start.