this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
207 points (99.1% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2490 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Lawmakers demand details of a Mar-a-Lago dinner where Trump promised to ease regulations on the oil industry while asking executives to steer $1 billion to his 2024 campaign.

House Democrats are launching an investigation into Donald Trump’s meeting with oil executives last month at his Mar-a-Lago Club, where the former president asked the executives to steer $1 billion to his 2024 campaign and promised to reverse dozens of President Biden’s environmental policies.

The probe comes after The Washington Post on Thursday first reported the fundraising dinner, where Trump said that giving $1 billion would be a “deal” because of the taxation and regulation the oil companies would avoid thanks to him, according to people with knowledge of the meeting, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe a private conversation.

In letters sent Monday evening, Democrats on the House Oversight Committee asked nine oil executives to provide detailed information on their companies’ participation in the meeting. The Democrats voiced concern that Trump’s request at the dinner may have been a quid pro quo and may have violated campaign finance laws, although experts say his conduct probably did not cross the threshold of being illegal.

Lawmakers sent the letters to the CEOs of Cheniere Energy, Chesapeake Energy, Chevron, Continental Resources, EQT Corporation, ExxonMobil, Occidental Petroleum and Venture Global. They also fired off a missive to the head of the American Petroleum Institute, the oil industry’s top lobbying arm in Washington.

Non-paywall link

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] reagansrottencorpse@lemmy.ml 52 points 6 months ago (2 children)

This wouldn't be such a problem if he was in prison where any of us would be had we committed his extensive list of crimes.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Any of us would be in prison for life if we committed one percent of his crimes.

[–] BeardedSingleMalt@kbin.social 12 points 6 months ago

We'd be in prison if we had 1 of his 12+ counts of contempt in one of his latest court cases

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

None of those charges have completed trial yet. All he’s done so far with his power and money is postpone the inevitable. If he’s found not guilty of the 88 criminal charges, then I’d agree with you.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago

I would love to have your optimism. I have no doubt that he'll be found guilty for some - probably not all, but hopefully a significant amount - of the charges against him. However, I am highly skeptical about him facing any serious consequences.

He has the political power and wealth to delay justice indefinitely. If he's found guilty, I highly doubt a judge will have the courage to sentence him to jail. Even then, he'll spend years appealing and delaying. If he's reelected, that will make things even more complicated, likely delaying many of his pending cases. Then he'd be 82 years old at the end of this term. Starting trials then, with their endless appeals and delays, would never result in him facing jail.

The best case scenario is that he loses all his trials and loses the election. Assuming some judge is ballsy enough to sentence him to jail, he will still be able to drag this out in appeals until his hamberder stuffed heart gives out.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I’d be curious to know what is a quid pro quo if not this.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago (1 children)

According to John Roberts they have to hand you a bag that has a giant dollar sign on it while you literally do the thing they tell you to do.

[–] whygohomie@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

...and you just do that thing during stampede of wild elephants in Porky Pig's Russian estate between 3:55 and 4:00 pm on the Fourth of July during a hailstorm. Oh, and there needs to also be one baby zebra bringing up the rear.

[–] 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 months ago

I'm sure You could skip all that and just wear a tan suit.

[–] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Only if the money goes to you personally. Free yachts or campaign donations legally don't count as bribes

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's only a 'quid pro quo' if a Democrat does it. That gets you arrested real quick

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

I wouldn't call two years "real quick" tbh..

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 22 points 6 months ago

Bold to ask for a billion dollars to undue all environmental regulations that Biden implemented when they know you'll do it for free

Because what else are you going to do?

[–] FiremanEdsRevenge@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago

I really hate this country's leadership. Now watch how Republicans will cry witch hunt.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


House Democrats are launching an investigation into Donald Trump’s meeting with oil executives last month at his Mar-a-Lago Club, where the former president asked the executives to steer $1 billion to his 2024 campaign and promised to reverse dozens of President Biden’s environmental policies.

The probe comes after The Washington Post on Thursday first reported the fundraising dinner, where Trump said that giving $1 billion would be a “deal” because of the taxation and regulation the oil companies would avoid thanks to him, according to people with knowledge of the meeting, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe a private conversation.


The original article contains 103 words, the summary contains 103 words. Saved 0%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

The original article contains 103 words, the summary contains 103 words. Saved 0%.

Excellent work AutoTLDR

[–] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

What type of food do you serve at a billion dollar oil fundraiser and what kind of invites do you think will get those doners to come to my house and give me money to "stop regulation"?

[–] treefrog@lemm.ee 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Perfect. I've got a guy who gives me a deal on the fries they're gonna throw out at the end of the night.

[–] whygohomie@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Freshwater clams from the Cuyahoga River?