this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
295 points (96.8% liked)

politics

19144 readers
2354 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 99 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I honestly think the best take away from that story (outside of her clearly unethical response) is that she's an absolutely trash leader who can't even properly raise a dog - a state or the country are far beyond her skillset.

[–] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 48 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's exactly the kind of ethics the GOP wants from their kingpins when they subvert democracy: the capacity to react murderously to disobedience.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 26 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I think you broke the code yes. I think it's moderately likely that "get your hands dirty" will become a phrase we hear again in the somewhat-near future as shit gets more and more real leading up to the election.

I'm not saying that at all as a good thing, just where the GOP seems to want things to be heading.

[–] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago (1 children)

"Having the strength to do the dirty work" has been a euphemism for committing selfish, barbaric atrocities for...forever, basically. A lot of the people prosecuted for Abu Ghraib used similar justification, for example.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

They don't seem to realize that Col Jessup was the villain in A Few Good Men.

[–] fireweed@lemmy.world 86 points 7 months ago (3 children)

South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem, a Republican seen as a potential running mate for Donald Trump, tells a story in her new book about shooting and killing her young dog and a goat

Noem, who became governor in 2019, likened murdering her canine to having the ability and willingness in politics to do anything “difficult, messy, and ugly.”

I remember when presidential candidate Mitt Romney sunk his political career by telling what he thought was a humorous tale of creative problem solving that involved strapping the family dog to the roof of an overloaded car. This is like that, but horrifyingly worse.

[–] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 50 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

During the 650-mile (1,050 km) trip, Seamus got diarrhea. The Romneys were first alerted to the Irish Setter’s bowel issues when Tagg noticed brown liquid pouring down the back window, followed immediately by him and his younger brothers yelling in disgust. Romney stopped at a gas station to wash the dog, the carrier, and the car. With Seamus back in the carrier, the family continued on their way.

I never knew the rest of the story.

[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

What an asshole.

[–] Jordan117@lemmy.world 35 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That was before the GOP became the party of sociopathy. I'm sure loving dogs will be the next symptom of the Woke Mind Virus.

[–] Orbituary@lemmy.world 30 points 7 months ago

Before they outed themselves as the party of sociopathy.*

FTFY

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 76 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Her daughter Kennedy looked confused, according to Noem, asking: “Hey, where’s Cricket?”

Jesus tapdancing Christ

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 52 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Honestly, killing animals like this is one of the first signs of serial killers, is it not?

[–] nolannice@lemmy.world 19 points 7 months ago

You can definitely argue that a lot of preventable covid deaths in SD were a result of her terrible policy.

[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

We know that she believes any being not immediately useful to her is unworthy of life. This is such a core part of her identity that she believes she deserves accolades for it. She didn't just kill her dog, she did it and then bragged about it because she thinks it makes her look strong.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 44 points 7 months ago

"I murdered my dog because I'm willing to get my hands dirty to get the job done"

No. You're just a psychopath...

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 53 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

This isn’t the point but how did she miss a whole goat and dog at point blank range? I own zero guns but I grew up in the South and I’m pretty sure I could hit the wizard in Mario 3 with a shotgun if you let me set up the shot.

The story should be that she’s an insane sociopath. But also, she missed! And she said construction workers were nearby and a school bus was coming. That’s some irresponsible shit. Don’t kill a puppy anyway but definitely don’t if there’s workers and a school bus nearby.

[–] Alto@kbin.social 20 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The answer is by simply not giving a fuck (or actively hoping to) if you inflict unnecessary suffering on the poor animal.

She's very clearly an outright psychopath, so I'm guessing it was on purpose.

[–] FanciestPants@lemmy.world 31 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I'm not sure I understand the logic of her even telling this story. So like if she finds herself unable to "train" a disobedient state judiciary or something, is she saying that this is her plan B?

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 41 points 7 months ago

Right? “I failed to train my dog and it killed a chicken while we were hunting birds, so I had to murder it.”

Okay, sorry your dog killed a bird while you were trying to get it to kill a different type of bird? You either didn’t train it well enough or it made an innocent mistake… not a reason to kill it

[–] insanitycentral@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 7 months ago

She's as out of touch of being able to train her dog as she is to be a representative of the State. When we voted to legalize weed, she made a sheriff start a lawsuit to block it on a BS technicality. Used citizen tax dollars against the will of the people who pay them.

More directly, this boast is more of anger issues being attempted of changing the narritive to "go getter attitude." Don't know details of the book, but how this article cites it seems more they she lost her shit over a puppy (honestly being a puppy) killing a neighbor's chicken (not specified if dog was loose or chicken got out), and even that didn't satiate her anger, she went and killed a goat for doing goat things (fertile male who was territorial.)

Honestly, her willingness to be a piece of shit (for various things, feel free to read her wikipedia) is a garner for attention from the worst parts of the GOP to only advance herself, because that's all who she cares about.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

It seems like a failure on multiple fronts. For the magabrained types, she was both unable to train a dog to hunt AND is apparently a bad shot and terrible at handling guns.

For the normal Americans, she just comes off like a psycho.

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 27 points 7 months ago

Kristi Noem is a fucking monster & the world will be a better place when she is a footnote in the wastepaper basket of political history.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 26 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Welp. There's no way anyone could ever convince me Republicans aren't evil now, having read all the stories of these monsters torturing or killing dogs. 😬

You hurt a dog, you're automatically discounted as a human-being in my eyes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] leadore@kbin.social 22 points 7 months ago (1 children)

She probably thinks telling this story will be sure to clinch trump's VP slot for herself.

[–] whoreticulture@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I don't think this story would alienate her from the MAGA base. Conservatives love the aesthetics of farm life/hunting, doing the dirty work, etc. We're talking about people who defended "grab her by the pussy".

[–] LesserAbe@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Even Republicans have dogs and love them. I think on balance this will hurt her, even from her base. People who like their dogs (if they hear about it) will be disgusted.

[–] leadore@kbin.social 12 points 7 months ago (2 children)

But you see, only trump's opinion matters, and trump hates dogs. If he picks her, magats will fall in line and come up with rationalizations that what she did was good.

[–] LesserAbe@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Not saying it's right, but most people feel more attachment to their dogs than to strangers (immigrants, queers, liberals etc). So while there will definitely be maga people who still support her, what I'm saying is on average, more people who might otherwise be supporters will be disturbed.

[–] leadore@kbin.social 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I think you're right that they'd be disturbed. But I think their cognitive dissonance will overcome that and they'll rationalize it in whatever way they need to to see it as acceptable, because in their eyes trump never makes a mistake or does anything wrong.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rottcodd@kbin.social 20 points 7 months ago

So saying the quiet part out loud has now extended to bragging about being a psychopath.

It seems that nearly every day I see another thing that future historians will be able to cite as an example of the alarmingly self-destructive behavior in the days leading up to the collapse of the US.

[–] babypigeon@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago

Kristi Noem is a despicable cunt. I hope she stubs a minimum of one toe every day for the rest of her miserable life.

[–] p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago

Of course it's a republican.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's funny to see her try to walk it back. So far not working.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

I’m guessing she’s “pro life”.

[–] chakan2@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Isn't that felony animal abuse?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

USA! USA!

Cruelty is the point and "the" bible gives them dominion over the animals. This is very on-brand for the repug party.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

What is, the opposite of John Wick, Alex?

load more comments
view more: next ›