I'm generally against remaking games that are currently perfectly playable. I'd vastly prefer getting DMC6 before they re-release the original for a second time.

[–] memo@feddit.it 4 points 6 months ago

To be fair:

it got a remaster; a remake is usually something that recreates the game from scratch.
DMC1 did not age that well in terms of gameplay, imo, as much as DMC3 did; it's a little stiffy! But it is true that it still plays much better than many PS2 games.

[–] all-knight-party@kbin.run 3 points 6 months ago

I second this. Especially since I think the first one still holds up. You will have to reintegrate your brain into being cool with the locked camera, but the game still plays well and has a lot of fun moments. DMC has had a really fantastic and interesting life beyond the original entries, so I think it'd be more fulfilling and interesting keep seeing what can be done with the series than to try and mine old content.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

I'd prefer 6 with a real Virgil campaign.

[–] Ilflish@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

No need for a remake. I'm fine to take remake or remasters of games stuck on legacy software but DMC 1 already has one its available on modern PCs.

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 2 points 6 months ago

They just can't decide 💀

[–] FLYGOD2x@jlai.lu 1 points 6 months ago

I wouldn't be mad at it. In some ways it can be perfected, especially in the platform aspect.

[–] AlexisFR@jlai.lu 0 points 6 months ago

The already did a remake in 2012, it was not liked.