this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2024
163 points (96.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35822 readers
828 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 132 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Once the Abrahamic Religions (Christianity, Judaism, and Islam) became huge. It's all about "Women are evil sluts who do nothing but sin and tempt the good and pious men", it's pretty evident in modern societies that have large populations of people that follow these religions.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 20 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The correct answer has three upvotes, and Victorian era rises to the top. Well, at least you have 4 upvotes now.

[–] qooqie@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

I feel like it has to be much more complicated than this. Sure they influenced the culture but a lot of polytheistic cultures seemed to also have coverings

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 89 points 7 months ago (5 children)

Victorian England is responsible for most of our annoying modesty rules. As to why... I'm not certain, they were just fucking prudes.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 42 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Women have been covering their breasts for modesty for ~5,000 years, not 150. Used as a means of identifying which women are “respectable” and which women are “publicly available” to men, upper class women in ancient Mesopotamia were made to wear veils that were wrapped loosely over their hair and fell to their waists, but poorer women were not allowed, and faced harsh punishments if they dared to wear them.

[–] FunkyMonk@kbin.social 30 points 7 months ago (1 children)

When your wealth system is nothing but cruel unfairness you always need somewhere else to point a finger, that somewhere was boobs.

[–] Madrigal@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Today it’s immigrants and trans people.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

modesty codes have predated Victorian England by a vast margin.

in fact... by some standards, VE was positively hedonistic. there are cultures where a woman seen un-escorted by her husband would be murdered for it. can you imagine what would have happened if the iranian girls protesting a hijab instead decided to flash people? those laws predates victorian england by quite a lot.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works -5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Sure, but modern puritanicalism can mostly be drawn back to Victorian England.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

in the US; sure. but the "need" to cover up... is common across most of Eurasia and predates England, never mind victorian england.

every culture has some question of modesty- showing different things might be considered immodest. IIRC, in certain parts of Africa it's calves that were considered the sexy bits. Which... caused friction when a woman missionary was lecturing on modesty. She was, of course, showing calves. and made sure to give the women t shirts (which promptly came back the next day with holes cut in because they got in the way of breastfeeding.) (it was then also explained that the men were all there because... sexy calves.)

[–] deadcatbounce@reddthat.com 1 points 1 month ago

On the surface. You might want to look a little closer.

The whole of London especially the East end, was a cesspool supported by the aristocracy. Jack the Ripper is still believed by many to have been a prince or someone of similar breeding.

[–] yemmly@lemmy.world 79 points 7 months ago (2 children)

It’s a conspiracy by Big Dairy to keep us udderly focused.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 9 points 7 months ago

My Holstein brings all the boys to the yard...

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I have been told that the taste of breast milk makes you want to hurt yourself, so Big Dairy is doing us all a favor with that one, honestly.

I am more concerned with minimalism being a scheme by Big Small to sell us more less.

[–] knightly@pawb.social 32 points 7 months ago

It varies by culture, but the short explanation is "Victorian morality".

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 24 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Where?

There's more than a few countries even in Western Europe where women can go topless in public.

Depending on where you're talking about, there's lots of different answers including "they don't"

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 38 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Can but it's still not normal or typical.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

In Spain, nudity is a constitutionally guaranteed human right - that's a stark difference compared to America and voyeuristic spying is considered a crime entirely on the peeper and not on the person having their privacy violated.

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Right, but it's not normal outside of beaches.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 16 points 7 months ago

You're correct, you won't find topless women wandering around city streets - but a woman may feel comfortable hanging up their laundry topless or being topless in their home near windows. In some parts of the US and Canada you can actually be fines for casual nudity if some asshole judge deemed it exhibitionist.

[–] zout@fedia.io 8 points 7 months ago

It's actually becoming less normal in a lot of places since every creep has a smartphone with a camera these days. Women have found their pictures or filmclips back on the internet, which was not the reason for going topless.

Also, it's been allowed in the last 50 - 60 years for most countries, not so much before.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 11 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Women can go topless in public in most of Canada and the US too, they just don't most of the time.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 15 points 7 months ago (1 children)

In North America you can expect verbal or physical assault for going topless. There's very much a culture of "She was asking for it".

[–] Maeve@kbin.social 4 points 7 months ago

Common saying about sexuality where I live, "A woman should cover herself. A man's going to be a man!" By man, I mean creep, but that's not how most people, including women, feel, even though it's literally creepy/pervy/and sexual assault.

I walked my dog past a church yesterday, baggy jeans and tee, and a guy who was letting himself in asked how I was and if I was behaving. I said I was fine and always behave. He literally leered so hard at me when he said I was having no fun that I couldn't get home fast enough.

[–] HottieAutie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 months ago

Tell us about the ones you know about

[–] Blizzard@lemmy.zip 9 points 7 months ago

Even though it's just a text post, I can hear your disappointment.

[–] stoicmaverick@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

Once all the boomers die, y'all can hang out topless wherever you want. Everybody else is cool with it.

[–] theodewere@kbin.social 7 points 7 months ago

men realized that women can cast spells with those thing, so we forced you to hide them

[–] FunkyMonk@kbin.social 6 points 7 months ago

AS A MAN I KNOW it's when I got chubby and because I don't like air on my nipples.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Maybe when wars started over them?

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

It's probably to keep prices high.

[–] Lath@kbin.earth 3 points 7 months ago

I blame the uptight protestants who needed a severe moral code or something.

Also, for a time period, in some tropical places bare breasts supposedly meant a prostitute was working.

I think that in Korea, up to the early 20th century, women of age were topless to show they weren't married. Covered up meant they were no longer free? Need a source on it for specifics if anyone cares to search.

And it was in an African tribe i think that the opposite happened. Bare breasts meant a mother that was actively breastfeeding.

It's all foggy memories though, so accuracy is low.

[–] Scrof@sopuli.xyz 1 points 7 months ago

I'd guess since about the first civilized settlements with agriculture.