this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2024
216 points (97.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35694 readers
986 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] shish_mish@lemmy.world 127 points 6 months ago (5 children)

They will give the poor credit, buy now pay later, till there is nothing left to squeeze out of them/us.

[–] rufus@discuss.tchncs.de 64 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I think this is the answer. They also need to advertise correctly so people feel the need to finance a $70.000 truck instead of buying a small used car for $4.000. Of course with interest and their credit score people will end up paying like double the price anyways.

Another option is to offer crappy versions of the same thing that are more affordable but break earlier. That way you also pay more over the years.

[–] PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world 57 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Vimes' theory of boots!

The reason that the rich were so rich, Vimes reasoned, was because they managed to spend less money. Take boots, for example. ... A really good pair of leather boots cost fifty dollars. But an affordable pair of boots, which were sort of OK for a season or two and then leaked like hell when the cardboard gave out, cost about ten dollars. ... But the thing was that good boots lasted for years and years. A man who could afford fifty dollars had a pair of boots that'd still be keeping his feet dry in ten years' time, while a poor man who could only afford cheap boots would have spent a hundred dollars on boots in the same time and would still have wet feet.

[–] rufus@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 6 months ago

Ah, thanks! I knew there was a name for it but couldn't remember.

[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

So many useless pavement pricess pickup trucks.

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 27 points 6 months ago

That's what they've been doing already. It already caused the 2008 financial crash with mortgages. The answer then was to throw around QE money to corporations like a socialist dressed up as Santa Claus and reduce interest rate to 0%.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Apple devices led to Apple Pay, Apple Pay led to the Apple Card, the Apple Card led to Apple Pay Later (installments). Now there are rumors that Apple will offer loans to cardholders.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gimpchrist@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago (6 children)

Yeah but what happens when there's nothing left though

[–] Restaldt@lemm.ee 14 points 6 months ago

You'll owe your soul to the company store

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] kambusha@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You can see this in Argentina. You can buy pretty much everything in installments. Trips, clothing, electronics, groceries - pay in 3, 6, 12 installments.

[–] psion1369@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Like I can with Klarna, Affirm, Zip, any number of credit cards, etc.

[–] peto@lemm.ee 69 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I suspect they will graciously provide the necessities in return for your labour and any remaining rights you have.

Take a look at how company stores and scrip worked. As the song goes: Saint Peter don't you call me 'cause I can't go/Sold my soul to the company store.

[–] Lemmeenym@lemm.ee 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The lyric is "I owe my soul to the company store". Sold requires a conscious choice, willingly entering into the agreement. Under a company script system children are forced into labor as early as possible to help pay the family debt. In less than a generation teenagers are given the "choice" to go to work or see their families already meager income reduced to cover "their portion" of the family debt.

[–] peto@lemm.ee 6 points 6 months ago

I stand corrected.

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 59 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (16 children)

The early 80s will happen again until the late 90s come back, So Reagan then Clinton. Crime will go up, Graffiti, homeless etc The rent is skyrocketing like when Reagan took over. The economy works when the middle class does well and we can't keep funneling the money higher up. When the middle class can afford a home and cooperations stop buying them up to lease that might help.

The upper class: keeps all of the money, pays none of the taxes. The middle class: pays all of the taxes, does all of the work. The poor are there...just to scare the shit out of the middle class." -George Carlin'

That's the way the ruling class operates in any society: they try to divide the rest of the people; they keep the lower and the middle classes fighting with each other so that they, the rich, can run off with all the fucking money. Fairly simple thing... happens to work..." -George Carlin

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] istanbullu@lemmy.ml 42 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

They will ask central banks to print money so poor people can take loans.

Wait a second....

[–] SkyeHarith@lemmy.world 30 points 6 months ago

I'd argue we're already there. Once you hit zero it’s not like you zip out of existence. When everyone is poor and has no money, the rich get to hire you and pay you enough to buy their products and keep them comfortable. You'll never make enough to get out of poverty because it's designed to keep you there.

Poverty isn't just about not having money, it's about never making enough to get out of poverty. When you're always living paycheck to paycheck, payday loan to payday loan - you're screwed. The system will never let you out. You're too profitable in that state to let out.

Think of the boot theory. If I only give you 10 bucks a year, you have to buy the 2 dollar boots every year that last only a year. The moment you made 11 dollars, you could buy the 5 dollar boot that lasts you a decade. The system incentivizes company's to sell 2 dollar boots cause it makes them more money in the long run, and if the entire world agrees to never pay you more than 10 dollars a year, every company can make that much more money. That's why your market value is not your fair pay.

The real reason poverty exists is because rich people need a slave class without being directly liable for owning them.

[–] TheJack@lemmy.world 30 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The first thing that came to mind upon reading the title is the movie Repo Men from 2010.

Plot from the Wikipedia:

In 2025, advancements in medical technology have perfected bio-mechanical organs.

A corporation known as The Union sells these expensive "artiforgs" on credit, and when customers are unable or unwilling to pay for their artiforgs The Union sends "repo men" to locate and forcibly repossess the organ - invariably resulting in the death of the owner.

[–] Mesophar@lemm.ee 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I thought you were talking about the better, original version "Repo! The Genetic Opera" at first

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown@fedia.io 26 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Nothing they will just sell their goods to those who can afford them. If individuals can’t afford an appliance, they will sell them to a landlord, a laundromat, a restaurant, another corporation, or rent them directly.

once poor people have no more money to use.

Unless you are referring to chattel slavery, or some barter system where people pay directly with goods or services, this is an impossibility. The poor will always be able to earn some meager amount of money (even if it’s company scrip), they just won’t be able to earn enough to escape poverty and debt. That’s what makes money valuable, that it can be exchanged for goods or labor.

[–] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 25 points 6 months ago

They’ll loan money to the poor people and once that reaches its conclusion they’ll import more poor people.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 24 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Well the young people in China have taken to "lying flat".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world 24 points 6 months ago

Other companies like Klarna will pay and you'll pay them back over however many months. My nan used to call that type of agreement 'putting it on the never never'

[–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 19 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (6 children)

The rich capitalists haven't made money the traditional way for about a generation now. The majority of wealth is made on the real estate and stock market which is based off of speculation and expectations of perceived value that have little to do with actual value.

So they'll just keep making money off their own money.

A little secret, if you want to see how this works, look into how to make LEAP Options calls on the SPY ETF. Basically you can leverage some money by buying an Options Call on a safe bet like betting on the top 500 US companies via an Exchange Traded Fund. A LEAP just means that bet is LONG term,over the course of years. Unlike Stocks, Options require you to either cash out (exercise) your Options after a certain amount of time (weeks to years) with the option to "roll over" your option call by putting down money for more time if it didn't do well in that allotted time, essentially doubling down on your bet should your bet not turn as much of a profit as you wanted.

This bet can be risky, but if you place your bet on say , the S&P 500, you bet on the top 500 companies. And you're basically betting on them doing well over a certain time period (say the next 3 years). The key to this is that Options call allows you to acquire say 60% more stock than you could technically afford, but you can only hold it for 3 years. If those 500 companies do well over the next 3 years (highly likely, pensions, retirement accounts, 401Ks, IRAs all rely on the S&P or some variation thereof), you get the returns of those stocks, and you got to leverage 60% more stocks than you could technically afford all because you were willing to make that bet within a certain time limit.

Worst case scenario is the US goes into a recession that lasts those 3 years and you either lose your entire investment or you invest some more money (but not as much as the initial bet usually) to extend your Option call out for another period of time.

It's one of the many ways even the moderately wealthy can earn a hefty profit over legalized gambling. The strategy I've just described to you is considered one of the safer bets amongst stock bros I've talked with, and it's a real life Free Money Glitch that works as long as US economy line goes up.

Now imagine the insanity that goes on in actual Wall Street with actual dynamically changing algorithms and people who have devoted their lives to making more money out of existing money, and you start to realize that these rich fucks at the top can basically say fuck all to investing in companies that create actual value, they just need lower level investors to believe that paradigm still exists.

They don't rely on your pennies to stay wealthy, they've created the ultimate dream of capitalism, where money infinitely generates more money regardless of what's happening in reality.

[–] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 7 points 6 months ago (4 children)

You are encouraging random internet people to do this.

Most of them don’t have enough sense to pull off gambling on a scale like you are talking about, my self included

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 9 points 6 months ago

Ok so put it on black?

[–] lung@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Hey man, the Internet has information, if you're not able to use it, that's not the information's fault

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ralphio@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Every trade has two sides. Someone has to sell you the options contract. No one is out there selling "free money" contracts. Why wouldn't they just give you the money and skip the song and dance?

To everyone else: please don't trade options if you don't understand them, there is no quicker way to drain your savings.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago

Use us as cheap labor to produce products intended to be sold overseas, just like China has been doing for the past 40 years or so.
Do you really think the people that made your iPhone will ever be able to afford an iPhone?

[–] morphballganon@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago

You're thinking about it like it's some abstract future event. It's not. It's a very real thing, not limited to the future. There are people who are broke right now, and people have been going broke for a very long time.

There isn't a point in time where everyone goes broke. People go broke at a rate. If you wait until everyone is broke you'll be waiting forever.

The thing that's wrong with the current financial reality is that the rate at which people go broke has increased. This means more homeless people on the streets than there were, say, 25 years ago.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 14 points 6 months ago

It's like Monopoly, they just keep going until there's only one player left and nobody is on speaking terms.

[–] Blizzard@lemmy.zip 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

In The Outer Worlds video game it's the reality - there's a few megacorporations and people are basically their property.

[–] MECHAGIC@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

We work to earn the right to work

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Some suspect that production will start to shift to worker owned enterprises and user owned services. These don't work for profit like capitalistic enterprises and can provide cheaper goods and services, something desperately needed when money is tight.

Another trend is distributed production. Capitalism works with the central production and distribution. However solar and wind often generate local and go against that model. Likely more forms of local production and distribution of food and goods are going to happen.

[–] zout@fedia.io 9 points 6 months ago

They will go bankrupt, but the shareholders will already have cashed out and moved to the companies of the next country.

[–] RidcullyTheBrown@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

If it happens gradually, then some will go out of business while others will modify the ordering to appeal to those with money. If it happens suddenly that people don’t have money to spend, then governments will try to bail them out with public money, thus accelerating the public’s descent into poverty and then some will go out of business while others will modify the offering, etc.

But the thing is, people who have the financial power or political influence to prevent common people from going into poverty don’t stand to loose from this collapse. People with power and money increase their power and money both when thighs go well and when they go bad. Unfortunately more so when they go bad.

Unless, of course, the French Revolution happens.

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Unless, of course, the French Revolution happens.

Unfortunately I think the only sort of revolution any country in the "West" is likely to see in the near future is a fascist one. Things haven't been going too great for the past N+1 years, so morons are flocking to the extreme right in droves because they promise easy solutions to complex problems – namely murderizing the fuck out of anyone who's not like them

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

More exploitation probably.

[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Oh, i see you have stumped onto one of the main inconsistencies of capitalism

[–] OwlPaste@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Trickle down shitononics will be taught to get your daily bread and water rations

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Alimentar@lemm.ee 6 points 6 months ago

The whole model they operate on is unsustainable. Either Blackrock and vanguard keep them afloat. Or they'll take on personal loans, issue out corporate debt. Or find ways to downscale, either job losses shrinkflation. Or raise prices. These are all desperate measures and are signs of an unsustainable company.

Losing the middle class (if that's their target market) is a company's biggest downfall.

And I feel that the little people will start to lose hope cause it feels like it doesn't matter... But it's similar to someone on credit card debt. You can only do it so long before it starts to catch up.

[–] merthyr1831@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

something really funny

[–] Damage@slrpnk.net 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

We'll circle back to feudalism

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

We never left it. Capitalism is just thinly veiled feudalism.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] splonglo@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I imagine they'd go under if they rely on the general public as their customer base. Companies that cater to the wealthy would probably grow. Companies are created and go bankrupt all the time, individuals in the owner class will win or lose but that won't affect the broad distribution of power. If it gets really bad feudalism might come back.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›