this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2024
523 points (98.0% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6660 readers
401 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hello_there@fedia.io 56 points 8 months ago

North Korea like: if I can't have a space program nobody else can either

[–] Zron@lemmy.world 54 points 8 months ago (17 children)

This is false advertising.

Starlink was the first company and product designed to intentionally increase space junk.

Although not needing to provide and internet connection does mean FragSat is a cheaper and more superior product.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 21 points 8 months ago (5 children)

Starlink to date has not had any collisions, and it saved me from Comcast.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] V0lD@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

Pretty sure the joke is aimed at cubesats

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] anonymous111@lemmy.world 38 points 8 months ago

"Just another way we're bringing space down to earth"

^ Fantastic tag line

[–] EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works 38 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Just spit balling here but is there any reason we couldn't also make the radioactive?

[–] casual_turtle_stew_enjoyer@sh.itjust.works 21 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Russian-American de-escalation line transcript from Dec 14th 2024:

Saltzman: Dmitry, care to enlighten me as to why exactly Roscosmos felt the need to launch a Soyuz with nothing but depleted uranium marbles on board?

Rogozin: Scy-eence

Saltzman: OK, and why the second one?

Rogozin: Ree-plecibility

Saltzman: ...

Rogozin: Vhat? I dought you like spacebolls

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 35 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Honestly you could do a ton of damage if you were to just yeet a metric ton or so of sand and gravel into LEO and released it in an exciting fashion

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 15 points 8 months ago

Make sure it's in a retrograde orbit for maximum fuckery

[–] Skates@feddit.nl 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Of course you could, but good luck letting Leo agree to that, he was even squeamish about the anal sex.

[–] Agility0971@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

sand accelerated on a glitter bomb like spinner so you cover all angles

[–] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 30 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Imagine a starship load of glitter. The horror!

[–] Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca 14 points 8 months ago

That sounds like a good way to find a spaceship full of dead astronauts with very glittery lungs.

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Or when the sun hits the glitter mass just right: the beauty?

[–] Gork@lemm.ee 22 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Kessler Syndrome is Bestler Syndrome.

Except for the Space Force, that is.

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

To be fair, something like this bud scaled up would be the only realistic way to try and fight off a hypothetical extraterrestrial invasion. Once I saw it suggested we could mass-deploy Thunder Wells to fill an orbital window with a cloud of giant steel shrapnel.

A Thunder Well is literally a bore hole with a nuke in it, and a huge steel plate on top. It was done originally as and experiment and they never did find that fucking plate; it might have been vaporized, but that's nothing a little redesign couldn't fix.

Wikipedia article

[–] chuck@lemmy.ca 17 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Simpsons did it already...

But really look at project Westford created a bit of stink

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_West_Ford

[–] LesserAbe@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Thanks for the link, I hadn't heard about that before.

[–] nuke@sh.itjust.works 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] Magnetar@feddit.de 5 points 8 months ago

HIMARS chonky uncle

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Steel balls touching each other would cold weld themselves into a clump if all touching like that. They're going to need a couple design changes.

[–] Zron@lemmy.world 31 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Not if they’re made on earth and exposed to the atmosphere.

The layer of iron oxide on the outside will prevent cold welding.

Or just coat them all in grease.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 8 months ago

All the vibration from them rubbing against each other as they achieve orbit will rub off the Oxide layer. A light oil would probably do just fine.

[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 21 points 8 months ago

It's not gay if steel balls don't touch.

[–] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Cold welding is crazy...

[–] perviouslyiner@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

Forbidden ball pit

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Hey y'all got any more of them dark ages?

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 months ago

That logo of a cinder block on the moon is incredible.

load more comments
view more: next ›