this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2024
244 points (99.6% liked)

Health - Resources and discussion for everything health-related

2314 readers
267 users here now

Health: physical and mental, individual and public.

Discussions, issues, resources, news, everything.

See the pinned post for a long list of other communities dedicated to health or specific diagnoses. The list is continuously updated.

Nothing here shall be taken as medical or any other kind of professional advice.

Commercial advertising is considered spam and not allowed. If you're not sure, contact mods to ask beforehand.

Linked videos without original description context by OP to initiate healthy, constructive discussions will be removed.

Regular rules of lemmy.world apply. Be civil.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A new review has concluded that hospitals that are privatised typically deliver worse quality care after converting from public ownership. The study, led by University of Oxford researchers, has been published in The Lancet Public Health.

Key findings:

  • Increases in privatisation generally corresponded with worse quality of care, with no studies included in the review finding unequivocally positive effects on health outcomes.
  • Hospitals converting from public to private ownership status tended to make higher profits. This was mainly achieved by reducing staff levels and reducing the proportion of patients with limited health insurance coverage.
  • Privatisation generally corresponded with fewer cleaning staff employed per patient, and higher rates of patient infections.
  • In some studies, higher levels of hospital privatisation corresponded with higher rates of avoidable deaths.
  • However, in some cases (e.g. Croatia), privatisation led to some benefits for patient access, through more precise appointments and new means of care delivery, such as out-of-hours telephone calls.
all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] stinerman@midwest.social 46 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Just ask an American. We could have told you this for free.

[–] Krackalot@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 7 months ago

I'm pretty sure we'd have to pay a copay, at least.

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Why does England seem to borrow systems from other countries and only take the bad, but not the good?

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You take the good, You take the bad, You take them both and there you have

The facts of life

[–] troglodytis@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

I want Charles in charge of me!

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

You pawned off the British Measurements pretty well, be proud of that

[–] MrTrono@lemmy.world 20 points 7 months ago

In other news the earth is round, fire is hot, and the Pope is Catholic

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 7 months ago

You mean hospitals ran for profit aren't as good as ones not wanting to cut every dollar from the budget as possible? I'm shocked, I tell you. Shocked indeed.

[–] witty_username@feddit.nl 10 points 7 months ago

Oh no who could've seen this coming?
Why hasn't anyone warned us!

[–] penquin@lemm.ee 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Lol. Well, come to 'Merica and find out without any study. Profits and shareholders fuck everything.

[–] SoupBrick@yiffit.net 4 points 7 months ago

Unregulated capitalism ftw!

[–] misterwu@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Water is wet etc...

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 3 points 7 months ago

Well, I for one, am shocked!

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Damn, if only we could have predicted this.

[–] leanleft@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

Boeing Part2!