this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
20 points (100.0% liked)

SneerClub

989 readers
1 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] self@awful.systems 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

the exact same schtick as an annoying edgy IRC kid setting up a fake chatbot under an alt account to send insults and threats to the channels they frequent, under the extremely flimsy excuse that they’re not doing it, their alt account pretending to be a bot is

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 12 points 1 year ago

figures 1-4: grimes fails a Turing test against herself

[–] gnomicutterance@hachyderm.io 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

what are you talking about, LLMs will *totally* respond to a follow-up of "autism spectrum?" with "no, like the spectrum of light and sound" to be logically consistent with the LLM's prior post, that's absolutely how they work shut up shut up.

Also as we all know non-algorithmic pure-LLM chatbots regularly say things like "dw human grimes, just a program glitch. not planning anything rogue just sharing some eccentric thoughts haha" to distinguish themselves from humans. It's just SCIENCE.

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Is there a statistical analysis that could prove (or disprove) that GrAImes (hey grimes, you can have that for free) is generated from her tweets? In any case, this is hilarious.

[–] acb@mastodon.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@swlabr Occam’s Razor says it’s just her attention-seeking with a sockpuppet.

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 5 points 1 year ago

Ok, ok, but what would Bayes say

[–] jonhendry@awful.systems 3 points 1 year ago

Are we sure it isn't Musk behind the "AI"?

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 5 points 1 year ago

Re: the idea that everyone on the internet is a 14-year-old nerdy kid with nothing better to do, this is prime evidence for that

[–] fasterandworse@awful.systems 8 points 1 year ago

being woke is a cult and it's bad for art

is the best opening line to the most mid creativity on twitter for the day

[–] bitofhope@awful.systems 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

From what I've previously come to understand, Grimes genuinely does believe LLMs are superhumanly intelligent and rather sinister precursors to an apocalyptic AGI.

Despite this, the output of this GPT is apparently not ominous enough so she needs to write spooky edgelord shit in guise of the bot for attention.

I'm sure she would find some way to cope with the cognitive dissonance if this seeming contradiction was pointed out to her.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 8 points 1 year ago

She also believed that Elon Musk was a visionary technological genius, so make of that what you will.

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 5 points 1 year ago

artist's impression, ay mate wot if it woz true

[–] jonhendry@awful.systems 3 points 1 year ago

Someone please set up a “GrimesHouseboatAI” account with appropriate tweets, sort of Marvin the Android if he were stuck in a Minneapolis impound yard for 15 years, and also dumb.