this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
20 points (100.0% liked)
SneerClub
983 readers
16 users here now
Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.
AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)
This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.
[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
what are you talking about, LLMs will *totally* respond to a follow-up of "autism spectrum?" with "no, like the spectrum of light and sound" to be logically consistent with the LLM's prior post, that's absolutely how they work shut up shut up.
Also as we all know non-algorithmic pure-LLM chatbots regularly say things like "dw human grimes, just a program glitch. not planning anything rogue just sharing some eccentric thoughts haha" to distinguish themselves from humans. It's just SCIENCE.
Is there a statistical analysis that could prove (or disprove) that GrAImes (hey grimes, you can have that for free) is generated from her tweets? In any case, this is hilarious.
Oh, don't get me wrong. I don't think any of this is AI generated at all. I think it's funny either way though, and it would be funnier if it could be proven either way.
@swlabr Occam’s Razor says it’s just her attention-seeking with a sockpuppet.
Ok, ok, but what would Bayes say
Are we sure it isn't Musk behind the "AI"?